A good point about the 7970's

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for powerman91
powerman91

692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 powerman91
Member since 2008 • 692 Posts

Ok so heres what Im thinking about the 7970's

So far I think anybody would rationally agree that the reference 680 is slightly better then the reference 7970. But one thing that I have noticed is that when both cards are ran at a higher and higher reolutions the 7970's performance seems to get better and better. Sooo if you were trying to make a more future proof system wouldnt you want to get the 7970?

I mean a year or so down the road say that 1600 resolution monitors were the norm and they were considerably cheaper then they are now. So say you could run 7970's in crossfire at 1600 resolution and you would probably get better performance then the 680's. What do you guys think? Im not being an AMD fanboy or anything I just found those results interesting is all.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

According to this, the GTX 680 outperforms the 7970 at 2560x1600 anyways, so that probably won't be an issue. As far as Crossfire vs SLI, that all depends on the scaling of the cards and the driver updates.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_680/27.html

Avatar image for powerman91
powerman91

692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 powerman91
Member since 2008 • 692 Posts

Yeah its still ahead of it by a bit. But you can see what I was saying though that the higher the resolutiuon the closer the two get in performance. :)

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#4 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Yeah its still ahead of it by a bit. But you can see what I was saying though that the higher the resolutiuon the closer the two get in performance. :)

powerman91

Yeah, they do get closer.. but the GTX 680 is still ahead. I would say that makes it the better choice for that resolution, unless you only play specific games that happen to run better on the 7900 series.

Avatar image for powerman91
powerman91

692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 powerman91
Member since 2008 • 692 Posts

[QUOTE="powerman91"]

Yeah its still ahead of it by a bit. But you can see what I was saying though that the higher the resolutiuon the closer the two get in performance. :)

hartsickdiscipl

Yeah, they do get closer.. but the GTX 680 is still ahead. I would say that makes it the better choice for that resolution, unless you only play specific games that happen to run better on the 7900 series.

Yeah there's no denying that its still ahead. Maybe if they make the graphics cards able to perform on resolutions above 1600 then the 7970 will be better. lol
Avatar image for Obiwan_1O
Obiwan_1O

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Obiwan_1O
Member since 2003 • 286 Posts

i love how no one takes into account that the 680 auto overclocks... if you OC the 7970 which i put mine in CCC up to 1125MHz 1575MHz without breaking a sweat with never a hickup or error, its prb just as fast or faster.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

i love how no one takes into account that the 680 auto overclocks... if you OC the 7970 which i put mine in CCC up to 1125MHz 1575MHz without breaking a sweat with never a hickup or error, its prb just as fast or faster.

Obiwan_1O

They do take that into account.