age of kings- maybe not as good as people say

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for monkeytoes61
monkeytoes61

8399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#1 monkeytoes61
Member since 2005 • 8399 Posts
I just got both age of empires 1 and 2 of an ebay auction. I wanted AEO 2 and AOE1 was just a bonus. Ironicaly, AEO1 is way better than AEO2. It has more of the feeling of building an empire than AEO2 did. Plus combat and campaigns were way better. Who agrees?
Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
IMHO AOE2 was much better than AOE1.
Avatar image for Mofright
Mofright

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Mofright
Member since 2007 • 114 Posts
Voting for 2. One's not a bad game, but 2 just looks better and gives you commands over your army. Sucks you got both of them so late seeing as microsoft shut the zone down last summer. You use to be able to match with other age players on there, which just leaves gamespy and it's spyware-whore self.
Avatar image for borris_1
borris_1

7181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 borris_1
Member since 2003 • 7181 Posts
The larger numbers of building, structures and factions (true?) makes AOE2 better, in my opinion. But then, I haven't played either in many years.
Avatar image for venomblack
venomblack

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 venomblack
Member since 2007 • 212 Posts
Voting for 2. One's not a bad game, but 2 just looks better and gives you commands over your army. Sucks you got both of them so late seeing as microsoft shut the zone down last summer. You use to be able to match with other age players on there, which just leaves gamespy and it's spyware-whore self.Mofright
agreed about gamespy. I hate that piece of trash.