Air Cooling Vs. Liquid Cooling. What's better?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IPwnNooBs666
IPwnNooBs666

1425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 IPwnNooBs666
Member since 2007 • 1425 Posts

I'm shopping around for a new computer and I'm thinking about getting a Digital Storm model but I'm at a loss of what cooling method I should go for. I hear Air Cooling is more reliable but then I also hear that Liquid Cooling is better for over clocking. Which one should I go for?

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Liquid helium cooling duh.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Freezer cooling. I run my PC out of my mini-fridge.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
peltier cooling (TEC)
Avatar image for w4rrior17
w4rrior17

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 w4rrior17
Member since 2010 • 943 Posts
Water cooling, if done right will allow a better OC. But it's more expensive for sure. A good air cooler will work just fine, water cooling is for the extreme overclocker.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I prefer the type of cooling that doesn't include a risk of water leaking inside my case.

Avatar image for damstr
damstr

8217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 damstr
Member since 2003 • 8217 Posts

As the first watercooled GS user I feel obligated to post. :P

Liquid cooling is definitely a more efficient way of displacing heat then air. Usually a liquid cooled setup runs quieter as well. With liquid cooling you can pump more voltage into the CPU/GPU which in return allows you to overclock further.

There's always the risk of water leaking inside your case but if it's done RIGHT then it will almost never leak. I took my old liquid cooled setup on at least 25+ cars rides of bumping around in my back seat going from school to home then to moving then back to school blah blah blah. Never once have I had a leak with that setup. Always make sure the barbs are always bigger then the ID of whatever tubing you get. My tubing is so tight on my barbs that I wouldn't feel uncomfortable running without clamps. Now the barbs on my CPU are smaller then I like and the tubes slid over it WAY to easily. I double clamped them and they still gave me trouble.

Also when you go to do an upgrade such as a video card (especially one that doesn't use the same block as your previous one) can be a real PITA. Have to drain your whole system then refill it back up again. Takes me like 10 mins but I've done it a couple times. :P

EDIT: Btw I had a LOT of water leak onto my old 8800GT when I was first testing my setup without my 5970. Card worked absolutely fine not one problem with it.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#8 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

As the first watercooled GS user I feel obligated to post. :P

Liquid cooling is definitely a more efficient way of displacing heat then air.

damstr

There's another problem to this.

Either way if your PC is cooled by radiators witch transfer the heat from your components to the radiator or if you have a heatsink directly to your components they both are cooled via Air.

The liquid cooling is only efficient if you have a good radiator (and often good fans) and a good pump and so on, water or not may not differ, it's alot more individual than that. To contradict water cooling, there are very many aircooled heatsinks to choose from and many are alot better than most cheap water cooling solution. If you're on a budjet, go Air, most cheap water cooling solutions are mostly cr*p.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Yes most water cooling stations suck, and no kit is the best, you have to buy parts individually. The best radiator is the thermochill one.
Avatar image for dbaron26
dbaron26

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dbaron26
Member since 2009 • 158 Posts

Going to overclock till the chip cries? Water

Stock speeds, slight oc? Air

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Water cooling can be a pain, having check the coolent level every 4-6 months. Then if a new socket comes out you have to wait for a company to make a water block and that can take awhile. Or even having water leaks, My father had WC system and the water block some how cracked and was leaking ended damaging the mobo and video card.Then you have to worry about the pump dying and when that happens no heat can be transfered, with a normal heatsink at least it wont flash fry unlike a WC if the pump dies . Ive seen peltier cooling in action and it works, the coolers you can get now do a good job as is with aircooling but as soon as they hit a certain temp and or the cpu stays at 100% for a time the peltier kicks in. And when it kicks on it will drop cpu temp to nearly room temp within a few seconds.
Avatar image for KhanhAgE
KhanhAgE

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 KhanhAgE
Member since 2004 • 1345 Posts
Do you actually plan on doing some serious OC'ing? If not, why even consider water cooling?
Avatar image for Too_tight_shoes
Too_tight_shoes

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Too_tight_shoes
Member since 2009 • 2486 Posts
Water cooling and luckily for us lazy gamers we have kits such as the Corsair H50, awesome thing but it doesn't offer much difference to extreme air coolers but still nice nonetheless.
Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

Do you actually plan on doing some serious OC'ing? If not, why even consider water cooling?KhanhAgE

I justify it for the low temps and low noise output. The OC'ing potential is an added side effect for me ;)

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
liquid is way more fun
Avatar image for NLahren
NLahren

1927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#16 NLahren
Member since 2009 • 1927 Posts

Going to overclock till the chip cries? Water

Stock speeds, slight oc? Air

dbaron26
what she/he said
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

I'm shopping around for a new computer and I'm thinking about getting a Digital Storm model but I'm at a loss of what cooling method I should go for. I hear Air Cooling is more reliable but then I also hear that Liquid Cooling is better for over clocking. Which one should I go for?

IPwnNooBs666
You listed the differences in your first post. If you want me to make the decision for you though, go with air.
Avatar image for KhanhAgE
KhanhAgE

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 KhanhAgE
Member since 2004 • 1345 Posts

[QUOTE="KhanhAgE"]Do you actually plan on doing some serious OC'ing? If not, why even consider water cooling?MaoTheChimp

I justify it for the low temps and low noise output. The OC'ing potential is an added side effect for me ;)

Low noise output is such a misconception with water cooling. Don't be surprise if you can clearly hear your water cooling unit working away.
Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

[QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

[QUOTE="KhanhAgE"]Do you actually plan on doing some serious OC'ing? If not, why even consider water cooling?KhanhAgE

I justify it for the low temps and low noise output. The OC'ing potential is an added side effect for me ;)

Low noise output is such a misconception with water cooling. Don't be surprise if you can clearly hear your water cooling unit working away.

It depends entirely on the pump. Some of the lower end Eheims, while having a relatively low flow rate, are pretty much inaudible. My old Laing D5 was also practically silent, and could only be heard if it wasn't mounted on rubber washers. Heck, even my modded Via Aqua 2300 is practically silent in comparison with my case fans (which are set to low with my fan controller), and yet it's able to output slightly over 100GPH in my loop.

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts
I went the cheap water cooling router and got a h50. My i5 750 hit 4 ghz no probs, never hits 70C even in prime.
Avatar image for GenericUser12
GenericUser12

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 GenericUser12
Member since 2009 • 313 Posts

Air cooling will suit your needs just fine, water cooling is an unnecessary risk. Leaks happen.

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

Air cooling will suit your needs just fine, water cooling is an unnecessary risk. Leaks happen.

GenericUser12
He never said what his needs were....
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
I advise getting at least a 3 stage cascade if you want to use a high end CPU.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
I advise getting at least a 3 stage cascade if you want to use a high end CPU.markop2003
I am sure he needs temperatures at about 163.1 kelvin.