AMD athlon 6400 x2 black edition 3.0 ghz-still good?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for desmith1231
desmith1231

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 desmith1231
Member since 2002 • 512 Posts

It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?

Thanks

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#2 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

It's been performing so well for me. desmith1231

Then why do you feel in need for an upgrade? ;) You can start concerning and worry when you're not happy with the performance you got, untill then...

Avatar image for duderino_23
duderino_23

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 duderino_23
Member since 2008 • 337 Posts

I have the same chip which i use mostly for gaming and am seriously thinking about upgrading to a

AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4GHz

Just because they are so cheap, but i may wait for the next big chip to be released which would see them drop in price even further. But there really is no need to upgrade yet.

Avatar image for fatcat13sep
fatcat13sep

1129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 fatcat13sep
Member since 2007 • 1129 Posts

i would wait for the hexa cores

Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts

As long as you are happy then you don't need to upgrade. CPUs tend to hold out longer, and with that card I'd say you are still in a good spot.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

Keep it. Athlon X2's are really something. Unless you play big RTS games with lots of AI or games like crysis it shouldn't bottleneck your gpu too much.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#7 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

Keep it. Athlon X2's are really something. Unless you play big RTS games with lots of AI or games like crysis it shouldn't bottleneck your gpu too much.

shakmaster13
Well, the athlon x2 isn't that great, it's slower than most other cpu's but at 3Ghz it'll be fine when paired up to a 8800gt.
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="shakmaster13"]

Keep it. Athlon X2's are really something. Unless you play big RTS games with lots of AI or games like crysis it shouldn't bottleneck your gpu too much.

swehunt

Well, the athlon x2 isn't that great, it's slower than most other cpu's but at 3Ghz it'll be fine when paired up to a 8800gt.

Anything that came out after and including the Athlon X2 6000+ will still play games fine for the most part. I would rather have a C2D, but the top Athlon X2's still perform well.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts
[QUOTE="desmith1231"]

It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?

Thanks

Quick question, arn't the black editions like the intel extreme version of processors? You spend the extra money for the unlocked multiplier. Doesn't that mean you intended OC it?
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts
[QUOTE="Bigsteve3570"][QUOTE="desmith1231"]

It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?

Thanks

Quick question, arn't the black editions like the intel extreme version of processors? You spend the extra money for the unlocked multiplier. Doesn't that mean you intended OC it?

Ah, yes but the old Athlons werent that great OC'ers, a few 100Mhz at most, and likely they does run hot so BE or not wont change that much on a 3Ghz Athlon 1 CPU. Most intel Extreme can and will OC rather high clocks. (not the old P4 extreme because they were alredy quite high clocked at stock.) The Athlon 2 or Phenom 2 BE versions are a whole diffrent thing, they will for most part OC quite well, but this is a Athlon 6400+ noth the new version.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
quad cores are more noisy, so dont upgrade just hold on to your current one till you have a problem.
Avatar image for neatfeatguy
neatfeatguy

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#12 neatfeatguy
Member since 2005 • 4415 Posts

[QUOTE="Bigsteve3570"][QUOTE="desmith1231"]

It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?

Thanks

swehunt

Quick question, arn't the black editions like the intel extreme version of processors? You spend the extra money for the unlocked multiplier. Doesn't that mean you intended OC it?

Ah, yes but the old Athlons werent that great OC'ers, a few 100Mhz at most, and likely they does run hot so BE or not wont change that much on a 3Ghz Athlon 1 CPU. Most intel Extreme can and will OC rather high clocks. (not the old P4 extreme because they were alredy quite high clocked at stock.) The Athlon 2 or Phenom 2 BE versions are a whole diffrent thing, they will for most part OC quite well, but this is a Athlon 6400+ noth the new version.

I've had pretty good experiences overclocking on a couple of AMD 64 X2 processors. I had a 3800+ (Manchester) that I took from 2.0 to roughly 2.8GHz - I had water cooling on this setup which most likely helped me push it so hard.

The other one was the 5600+ (Windsor). Stock speed was 2.8GHz, I was able to take it to 3.15 on air. One of the two cores wouldn't stabilize over 3.15, no matter what I tweaked. The other core would run stable enough at 3.3 to allow me to boot the computer and do most tasks if I wanted to, but with the other core running with so many faults at that speed I couldn't do anything demanding - like gaming.

I don't see why you shouldn't be able to do something similar with a BE.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#13 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

[QUOTE="swehunt"][QUOTE="Bigsteve3570"] Quick question, arn't the black editions like the intel extreme version of processors? You spend the extra money for the unlocked multiplier. Doesn't that mean you intended OC it?neatfeatguy

Ah, yes but the old Athlons werent that great OC'ers, a few 100Mhz at most, and likely they does run hot so BE or not wont change that much on a 3Ghz Athlon 1 CPU. Most intel Extreme can and will OC rather high clocks. (not the old P4 extreme because they were alredy quite high clocked at stock.) The Athlon 2 or Phenom 2 BE versions are a whole diffrent thing, they will for most part OC quite well, but this is a Athlon 6400+ noth the new version.

I've had pretty good experiences overclocking on a couple of AMD 64 X2 processors. I had a 3800+ (Manchester) that I took from 2.0 to roughly 2.8GHz - I had water cooling on this setup which most likely helped me push it so hard.

The other one was the 5600+ (Windsor). Stock speed was 2.8GHz, I was able to take it to 3.15 on air. One of the two cores wouldn't stabilize over 3.15, no matter what I tweaked. The other core would run stable enough at 3.3 to allow me to boot the computer and do most tasks if I wanted to, but with the other core running with so many faults at that speed I couldn't do anything demanding - like gaming.

I don't see why you shouldn't be able to do something similar with a BE.

I think you somewhat fail to see my point. As i alredy mentioned that he's alredy at 3Ghz, in the best case scenario he'll be lucky to get to 3,3-3,5Ghz running very hot and high vcore, this is just my thinking, perhaps he is sitting on a goldmine an have tested out many many chips to find one able to do 3,5ghz, but unlikely. I dont say they don't OC, but getting them to a speed where they could be considerated good is near impossible that would be 4Ghz chip, this seems to be an hopeless task for most Athlon1 CPU's. My main point is that he'll start oc'ing from 3Ghz, and trying to improve that wouldn't be a bad idea, but getting a few 100Mhz isn't makeing a whole lot of diffrence. The arichetcure itself isn't that high clock friendly, BE or not.
Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

As long as you are happy then you don't need to upgrade. CPUs tend to hold out longer, and with that card I'd say you are still in a good spot.

Sparticus247
I definitely agree :)
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
quad cores are more noisy, so dont upgrade just hold on to your current one till you have a problem.dakan45
What?
Avatar image for ravenguard90
ravenguard90

3064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ravenguard90
Member since 2005 • 3064 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]quad cores are more noisy, so dont upgrade just hold on to your current one till you have a problem.04dcarraher
What?

Lol, exactly my thoughts. Processors don't make any noise... :P

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Just upgrade when you need to, there's little point upgrading just because you can
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="dakan45"]quad cores are more noisy, so dont upgrade just hold on to your current one till you have a problem.ravenguard90

What?

Lol, exactly my thoughts. Processors don't make any noise... :P

Quad cores require more cooling, therefore the fans are more noisy.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="ravenguard90"]

What?04dcarraher

Lol, exactly my thoughts. Processors don't make any noise... :P

Quad cores require more cooling, therefore the fans are more noisy.

Actually they dont. AMD has used the same standard in cooling for their 125-140w cpu coolers to their 95w or under cpu's since the Athlon X2's. Each generation of cpu's get smaller and produce less heat then the previous cpu because they use less energy.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="ravenguard90"]

Lol, exactly my thoughts. Processors don't make any noise... :P

04dcarraher

Quad cores require more cooling, therefore the fans are more noisy.

Actually they dont. AMD has used the same standard in cooling for their 125-140w cpu coolers to their 95w or under cpu's since the Athlon X2's. Each generation of cpu's get smaller and produce less heat then the previous cpu because they use less energy.

Really? Then why the hell my 5200+ 2.6ghz dual core is far less noisy than my 995 pehom ii 3.2 quadcore? Both using stock coolers and the 955 cooler is better than the athlon x2 5200+ Clearly either the phenom or the quadcores need more cooling. I dont know which one. But sure as hell the temps of the new cpus are higher and the max temp is lower.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

Well there is such a thing as a out of sync fan which will make more noise. The change in fan brands that AMD uses may have happened too. Fan speeds depend on cpu temps also. Every Phenom 2 that Ive seen runs cooler then my X2 6000 did with its stock cooler. If the cpu heatsink isnt seated right or there too much or not enough thermal compound will cause the cpu to heat up more which in turns make the cpu fan spin faster to try to cool the cpu. Theres a couple of ways to control your cpu rpm speeds. one this through the bios setting the fan controller to be on a silent mode . Or just get a fan controller and hook up your cpu fan to it and control it manually.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Well there is such a thing as a out of sync fan which will make more noise. The change in fan brands that AMD uses may have happened too. Fan speeds depend on cpu temps also. Every Phenom 2 that Ive seen runs cooler then my X2 6000 did with its stock cooler. If the cpu heatsink isnt seated right or there too much or not enough thermal compound will cause the cpu to heat up more which in turns make the cpu fan spin faster to try to cool the cpu. Theres a couple of ways to control your cpu rpm speeds. one this through the bios setting the fan controller to be on a silent mode . Or just get a fan controller and hook up your cpu fan to it and control it manually.

04dcarraher
Yeah but controlling it manually does not cool the cpu better. Its so noisy that i use cool and quite to reduce speed and energy usage in order to make the cpu less noisy.
Avatar image for Luminouslight
Luminouslight

6397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Luminouslight
Member since 2007 • 6397 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Quad cores require more cooling, therefore the fans are more noisy.dakan45

Actually they dont. AMD has used the same standard in cooling for their 125-140w cpu coolers to their 95w or under cpu's since the Athlon X2's. Each generation of cpu's get smaller and produce less heat then the previous cpu because they use less energy.

Really? Then why the hell my 5200+ 2.6ghz dual core is far less noisy than my 995 pehom ii 3.2 quadcore? Both using stock coolers and the 955 cooler is better than the athlon x2 5200+ Clearly either the phenom or the quadcores need more cooling. I dont know which one. But sure as hell the temps of the new cpus are higher and the max temp is lower.

Just get an aftermarket cooler? They are only maybe $30 at most (my Mugen-2 was $32 FS on Newegg). And my Tj max on my i7 920 is 100C, and I don't see how that is lower than my old Athlon 64 4000+ which had a Tj max of 60C.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#24 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Actually they dont. AMD has used the same standard in cooling for their 125-140w cpu coolers to their 95w or under cpu's since the Athlon X2's. Each generation of cpu's get smaller and produce less heat then the previous cpu because they use less energy.Luminouslight

Really? Then why the hell my 5200+ 2.6ghz dual core is far less noisy than my 995 pehom ii 3.2 quadcore? Both using stock coolers and the 955 cooler is better than the athlon x2 5200+ Clearly either the phenom or the quadcores need more cooling. I dont know which one. But sure as hell the temps of the new cpus are higher and the max temp is lower.

Just get an aftermarket cooler? They are only maybe $30 at most (my Mugen-2 was $32 FS on Newegg). And my Tj max on my i7 920 is 100C, and I don't see how that is lower than my old Athlon 64 4000+ which had a Tj max of 60C.

Thats why i got an aftermaker cooler and a good paste. But seriously, i cant believe taht the stock cooler is so uneffective. As for temps? Yes i am aware than intel>amd when it comes to quality and durable or oveclocking capabilities. My old athlon max was 70c and it run at 34-45c but my phenom ii runs at 40-55c and max is 62c!! Painfull as hell is it not?
Avatar image for DieselCat18
DieselCat18

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 DieselCat18
Member since 2002 • 3008 Posts

It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?

Thanks

desmith1231

Nice monitor btw....:).... I have the 23"

I would say leave it be and do something only when you start see major performance issues or if a part breaks down on you. If your wanting to upgrade just for the sake of doing it, them that's up to you, deciding if you want to spend the money on new parts when you have a system that still runs very well. There are a few more games that have been coming out that are being optimized for quad cores, but most are still made to utilize duel core cpu's...I would say there is still plenty of life in your AMD....Hell, I have a Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 939 running on my other PC and that thing is still a little beasty....;)

*+

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="Luminouslight"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Really? Then why the hell my 5200+ 2.6ghz dual core is far less noisy than my 995 pehom ii 3.2 quadcore? Both using stock coolers and the 955 cooler is better than the athlon x2 5200+ Clearly either the phenom or the quadcores need more cooling. I dont know which one. But sure as hell the temps of the new cpus are higher and the max temp is lower.

dakan45

Just get an aftermarket cooler? They are only maybe $30 at most (my Mugen-2 was $32 FS on Newegg). And my Tj max on my i7 920 is 100C, and I don't see how that is lower than my old Athlon 64 4000+ which had a Tj max of 60C.

Thats why i got an aftermaker cooler and a good paste. But seriously, i cant believe taht the stock cooler is so uneffective. As for temps? Yes i am aware than intel>amd when it comes to quality and durable or oveclocking capabilities. My old athlon max was 70c and it run at 34-45c but my phenom ii runs at 40-55c and max is 62c!! Painfull as hell is it not?

What case are you using?

Avatar image for KLONE360
KLONE360

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 KLONE360
Member since 2007 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Luminouslight"]Just get an aftermarket cooler? They are only maybe $30 at most (my Mugen-2 was $32 FS on Newegg). And my Tj max on my i7 920 is 100C, and I don't see how that is lower than my old Athlon 64 4000+ which had a Tj max of 60C.04dcarraher

Thats why i got an aftermaker cooler and a good paste. But seriously, i cant believe taht the stock cooler is so uneffective. As for temps? Yes i am aware than intel>amd when it comes to quality and durable or oveclocking capabilities. My old athlon max was 70c and it run at 34-45c but my phenom ii runs at 40-55c and max is 62c!! Painfull as hell is it not?

What case are you using?

Aluminum box with no holes in it that he found in his basement.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="shakmaster13"]

Keep it. Athlon X2's are really something. Unless you play big RTS games with lots of AI or games like crysis it shouldn't bottleneck your gpu too much.

swehunt

Well, the athlon x2 isn't that great, it's slower than most other cpu's but at 3Ghz it'll be fine when paired up to a 8800gt.

You know what is pretty impressive about the Athlon 64 X2? The chip is going to be 5 years old in May, and they still run most games very well as long as you you have them clocked at 2.5-2.6ghz or higher. Pretty good investment for alot of people.

Avatar image for DieselCat18
DieselCat18

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 DieselCat18
Member since 2002 • 3008 Posts

[QUOTE="swehunt"][QUOTE="shakmaster13"]

Keep it. Athlon X2's are really something. Unless you play big RTS games with lots of AI or games like crysis it shouldn't bottleneck your gpu too much.

hartsickdiscipl

Well, the athlon x2 isn't that great, it's slower than most other cpu's but at 3Ghz it'll be fine when paired up to a 8800gt.

You know what is pretty impressive about the Athlon 64 X2? The chip is going to be 5 years old in May, and they still run most games very well as long as you you have them clocked at 2.5-2.6ghz or higher. Pretty good investment for alot of people.

Agreed...you are absolutely correct Sir !..............

*+

Avatar image for desmith1231
desmith1231

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 desmith1231
Member since 2002 • 512 Posts

Thanks for all the informative responses! I will hold on to this untill I really feel that an upgrade is absolutley necessary!

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#31 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

Thanks for all the informative responses! I will hold on to this untill I really feel that an upgrade is absolutley necessary!

desmith1231

Good, when it's necessary im sure you won't have regrets about waiting for the next price/performance witch should be alot better than today.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#32 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

I have the same chip which i use mostly for gaming and am seriously thinking about upgrading to a

AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4GHz

Just because they are so cheap, but i may wait for the next big chip to be released which would see them drop in price even further. But there really is no need to upgrade yet.

duderino_23

i know i saw a significant increase in just about all my games, when i upgraded from a 6000+ to a phenom II 940 (same pc) and up to almost 2 times the performance increase on some games.

and a good phenom II quad or any good quad will last you a few more years easily.

honestly i wouldnt get a hexacore when they first come out, id wait for the 2nd or 3rd generation of it. (plenty of obvious reasons, games wont utilize it then at much if at all, plus it gives them time to make it right, or to improve the quality, for instance phenom vs phenom II