AMD Phenom 9750 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600; which is better?

yeah, intel is that way to go right now.cole_793

as it has been for the last 3-4 years >_>

yeah, intel is that way to go right now.cole_793

and... *looks at ur avatar...*

D: why cant i have that?

[QUOTE="cole_793"]yeah, intel is that way to go right now.GTR2addict

as it has been for the last 3-4 years >_>

More like 1-2 years. Time passes by quicker, the single core AMD's owned.

nevar!cole_793

NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

q6600 faster,overclocks better but sucks more power thus releases more heat but definitely q6600 is the way to goGames_pro

It does not suck more power than the AMD.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3272

nevar!cole_793

:lol:

Who is that chic, btw? She's pretty cute if you don't mind me saying so. ^_^

[QUOTE="cole_793"]nevar!Wesker776

:lol:

Who is that chic, btw? She's pretty cute if you don't mind me saying so. ^_^

thats what EVERYONE on this gotdamn forum wants to know... and ure not the only one to say so >_>

He doesn't know, there should be a sticky :lol: Q6600 unless you're a fanboy................X360PS3AMD05

Watch out, the fanboys can flame you for that :P

but I agree, I can't find a reason to justify a phenom rigth now.

Q6600

However, AMD's Athlon 64X2 6400+ can preform surprisingly well in gaming, so it may be something to look into.

Q6600

However, AMD's Athlon 64X2 6400+ can preform surprisingly well in gaming, so it may be something to look into.

charrr1234

the 6400+ isn't a bad cpu, but if you take a cheapo c2d an have a little OC it's faster than the 6400+ (and it's also less than the $159.99 they take for the 6400+ on newegg)

i got a phenom and was really mad at myself. i should of gotten a 6400. they go on sale all the time on neweggnagol726

That's why I'm getting one for my new rig.

[QUOTE="Wesker776"]

[QUOTE="cole_793"]nevar!GTR2addict

:lol:

Who is that chic, btw? She's pretty cute if you don't mind me saying so. ^_^

thats what EVERYONE on this gotdamn forum wants to know... and ure not the only one to say so >_>

Well if she's his girlfriend, then he has every right to keep it from us. But if he found her on a...google image search, then I think it's in his best interest to tell us. :lol:

If that's the member posting her own pic, then I think it's time for the universe to implode. :lol:

Q6600

However, AMD's Athlon 64X2 6400+ can preform surprisingly well in gaming, so it may be something to look into.

charrr1234

I haven't bothered checking in a long while, but I'd rather recommend people to go for the E8200 or E7200 over the 6400+.

The 6400+ is pretty much running at full capacity where as the Intel Core 2's have quite a lot of headroom for overclocking.

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"][QUOTE="Wesker776"]

[QUOTE="cole_793"]nevar!Wesker776

:lol:

Who is that chic, btw? She's pretty cute if you don't mind me saying so. ^_^

thats what EVERYONE on this gotdamn forum wants to know... and ure not the only one to say so >_>

Well if she's his girlfriend, then he has every right to keep it from us. But if he found her on a...google image search, then I think it's in his best interest to tell us. :lol:

If that's the member posting her own pic, then I think it's time for the universe to implode. :lol:

Q6600

However, AMD's Athlon 64X2 6400+ can preform surprisingly well in gaming, so it may be something to look into.

charrr1234

I haven't bothered checking in a long while, but I'd rather recommend people to go for the E8200 or E7200 over the 6400+.

The 6400+ is pretty much running at full capacity where as the Intel Core 2's have quite a lot of headroom for overclocking.

his gf? no ****ing way man... and it cant be him, hes a GUY, but thte google link wold so friggin awesome

2nd option, and the E8200 is NOT better than the Q6600, the E8400 is, and thats only in a few casesGTR2addict

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]2nd option, and the E8200 is NOT better than the Q6600, the E8400 is, and thats only in a few casesHitman_887

oh yh? Q6600 at 3 ghz vs E8200 at 3 ghz = Q6600 wins

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3272

[QUOTE="cole_793"]nevar!Wesker776

:lol:

Who is that chic, btw? She's pretty cute if you don't mind me saying so. ^_^

wesker, dont forget, that is with a stock Q6600... a Q6600 at like... 3.4 wold PWN them all, xcept for a 3.4 ghz 9300 :P

oh yh? Q6600 at 3 ghz vs E8200 at 3 ghz = Q6600 wins

GTR2addict

wesker, dont forget, that is with a stock Q6600... a Q6600 at like... 3.4 wold PWN them all, xcept for a 3.4 ghz 9300 :P

GTR2addict

Q6600 is faster clock for clock than the Q9300 "genious".

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]

oh yh? Q6600 at 3 ghz vs E8200 at 3 ghz = Q6600 wins

Hitman_887

wesker, dont forget, that is with a stock Q6600... a Q6600 at like... 3.4 wold PWN them all, xcept for a 3.4 ghz 9300 :P

GTR2addict

Q6600 is faster clock for clock than the Q9300 "genious".

yeah it will, except for single threaded apps, there the 8200 wins, and the Q6600 (mine) is at 3 ghz cuz i want it to, but i can take it to 3.6 if i want to...

how can a Q6600 be faster clock for clock than the 9300 if the 8200 is faster than the Q6600 clock for clock? :? im confused now, u say that the E8200 is better c for c, but the 9300 isnt? thats bull**** mate, GTFO

how can i be clueless after 3 years of workin with computers?

oh yes, this is the guy that is in lvl 5 with 132 posts, vs the guy in lvl 20 with >1500 posts (over 1000 of those were made in pc hardware) i kno what im talkin bout here

yeah it will, except for single threaded apps, there the 8200 wins, and the Q6600 (mine) is at 3 ghz cuz i want it to, but i can take it to 3.6 if i want to...

how can a Q6600 be faster clock for clock than the 9300 if the 8200 is faster than the Q6600 clock for clock? :? im confused now, u say that the E8200 is better c for c, but the 9300 isnt? thats bull**** mate, GTFO

how can i be clueless after 3 years of workin with computers?

oh yes, this is the guy that is in lvl 5 with 132 posts, vs the guy in lvl 20 with >1500 posts (over 1000 of those were made in pc hardware) i kno what im talkin bout here

GTR2addict

The E8200 has 6MB per 2 cores cache,the Q6600 has 4MB per 2 cores cache,the Q9300 has 3MB per 2 cores cache.

No you didnt know what you were saying.

And you can take your Q6600 to 3.6Ghz?Do you have a budget rig?What are you waiting for?

i have a 1800$ rig, the cooler is a freezer 7 pro, it keeps (at 3.6 ghz ) the cpu at 38 idle and ~50 on loadGTR2addict

And ya your Q6600 is 100% stable at 3.6?I can bet it isnt with that cooler regardless of the motherboard.

Can we cut the net fights? I thought the thread was perfectly fine when we talking about that chic. :P

A Q6600 is faster than an E8400 in multithreaded apps, even at stock speeds. But the E8400 is faster in applications that do not use more than 2 cores.

Also, let me put it this way; Penryn is faster then Conroe, clock for clock.

Can we cut the net fights? I thought the thread was perfectly fine when we talking about that chic. :P

A Q6600 is faster than an E8400 in multithreaded apps, even at stock speeds. But the E8400 is faster in applications that do not use more than 2 cores.

Also, let me put it this way; Penryn is faster then Conroe, clock for clock.

Wesker776

there ya go, thread done

and the mobo is a GA-EP35-DS3R

Can we cut the net fights? I thought the thread was perfectly fine when we talking about that chic. :P

A Q6600 is faster than an E8400 in multithreaded apps, even at stock speeds. But the E8400 is faster in applications that do not use more than 2 cores.

Also, let me put it this way; Penryn is faster then Conroe, clock for clock.

Wesker776