AMD Phenom X4 Quad Core or iNTEL i3 Sandy Bridge?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Excized
Excized

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Excized
Member since 2011 • 71 Posts
im using one of theese to play on a computer games like battlefield and minecraft which one is better overall?
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

They perform similarly with the i3 usually performing a little better.

I'd go for the i3 but would definitely consider looking at the 2500k.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

They perform similarly with the i3 usually performing a little better.

I'd go for the i3 but would definitely consider looking at the 2500k.

Tezcatlipoca666

id get the phenpom II x4 if your upgrading or doing a new build for under $790 800+ iis probabluy where id go i5 2500/2500k

Avatar image for istuffedsunny
istuffedsunny

6991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#4 istuffedsunny
Member since 2008 • 6991 Posts

Either one will play Minecraft lol But if you want to play more intensive games you're wasting your money by buying a dualcore in 2011. They're already coming out with hexacores.

Edit: So in case it's not obvious, I'm for AMD in this case

Avatar image for whitey_rolls
whitey_rolls

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 whitey_rolls
Member since 2006 • 2547 Posts

Purchasing a dual core isn't the best idea at this point. If you want to stay ascheap as possible go with AMD - if you want great performance get a Sandybridge I5 and if you plan on overclocking make sure it's a K series chip.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I concur with most of the other posters. You're better off getting a Phenom II X4 and AM3 motherboard on a budget build. Getting a dual-core (even a fast one like an i3) isn't a smart decision for future games/programs. The i3 architecture is better than the Phenom II's, but the 2 extra cores will be very handy. The X4 955 is currently the smartest buy at about $120 from newegg. It's 3.2ghz stock, which is more than enough for any game.. plus it has good overclocking headroom, which is made easy by it's unlocked multiplier.

If you're spending under about $800-$850 on the PC, go for the 955 and an AM3 mobo. If spending more, go for the i5 2500k and an LGA 1155 motherboard.

Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts

I concur with most of the other posters. You're better off getting a Phenom II X4 and AM3 motherboard on a budget build. Getting a dual-core (even a fast one like an i3) isn't a smart decision for future games/programs. The i3 architecture is better than the Phenom II's, but the 2 extra cores will be very handy. The X4 955 is currently the smartest buy at about $120 from newegg. It's 3.2ghz stock, which is more than enough for any game.. plus it has good overclocking headroom, which is made easy by it's unlocked multiplier.

If you're spending under about $800-$850 on the PC, go for the 955 and an AM3 mobo. If spending more, go for the i5 2500k and an LGA 1155 motherboard.

hartsickdiscipl

I vote for this. Go with a 955 if on a budget. The 955 is a min but still very good at the same time.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

get the i3 Sandy Bridge as it is dirt cheap and just pair it with a board that will allow you to oc a i5 2500k in the future if you so choose to upgrade your cpu ....

currently I am waiting and saving up money in order to buy an i5 2500k cuz there is nothing out there that can beat its performance/value .... awesome cpu !!!

AMD right now is dead in my books

DeViLzzz

Or you could buy an X4 955 BE now and an AM3+ motheboard that will allow you to upgrade to Bulldozer down the road. That way you get great performance and 4 cores now, then the option to upgrade to a CPU that should be on par with or better than Sandy Bridge later.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

Bulldozer delayed til July. Oh AMD just when I was considering buying a cpu from you again.

DeViLzzz

end of june.. incorrect

Avatar image for caseystryker
caseystryker

5421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 caseystryker
Member since 2005 • 5421 Posts

[QUOTE="DeViLzzz"]

get the i3 Sandy Bridge as it is dirt cheap and just pair it with a board that will allow you to oc a i5 2500k in the future if you so choose to upgrade your cpu ....

currently I am waiting and saving up money in order to buy an i5 2500k cuz there is nothing out there that can beat its performance/value .... awesome cpu !!!

AMD right now is dead in my books

hartsickdiscipl

Or you could buy an X4 955 BE now and an AM3+ motheboard that will allow you to upgrade to Bulldozer down the road. That way you get great performance and 4 cores now, then the option to upgrade to a CPU that should be on par with or better than Sandy Bridge later.

Exactly what I'm planning on doing. Bring on the dozer.
Avatar image for eBusiness
eBusiness

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 eBusiness
Member since 2009 • 405 Posts

In a year or so you are going to miss having those two extra cores.

An option that seems to be overlooked is an i5 2400 and a cheap H61 or H67 motherboard. The 2500K is certainly a great option for those who can affor it, but you pay a premium on both board and processor to unlock the famed overclocking.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

In a year or so you are going to miss having those two extra cores.

An option that seems to be overlooked is an i5 2400 and a cheap H61 or H67 motherboard. The 2500K is certainly a great option for those who can affor it, but you pay a premium on both board and processor to unlock the famed overclocking.

eBusiness
Yes the 2400 is a good CPU, but only for non-enhuiasts as it has no OC headroom whatsoever. I would wait untill there are more AM3+ boards to choose from, the selection is a little thin today, but waiting and buy a decent board at a cheap price who suppot a BullD later on seems like a good choise but we know nothing about the real performance they have. Depending on the build budjet a 2500k is a great buy today, but spending that much money to get high performance parts i would seriously consider waiting for bulldozer before making the buy.
Avatar image for fishing666
fishing666

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 fishing666
Member since 2004 • 2113 Posts
get sandy bridge because bulldozer obviously couldn't take the sandy bridge down
Avatar image for demonic_85
demonic_85

1395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#16 demonic_85
Member since 2009 • 1395 Posts

I would recommend reading this article: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/990fx-sli-am3,2953.html

It pits one of AMD's best quads against one of the new Sandy Bridge quads with other specs identical, same budget. It shows how far behind AMD is currently. Nothing wrong with an AMD quad but if your concern is best processor for the money so you can play future games, Sandy Bridge is the way to go.... or like others said you can wait until Bulldozer comes out to see how it performs.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#17 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

I would recommend reading this article: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/990fx-sli-am3,2953.html

It pits one of AMD's best quads against one of the new Sandy Bridge quads with other specs identical, same budget. It shows how far behind AMD is currently. Nothing wrong with an AMD quad but if your concern is best processor for the money so you can play future games, Sandy Bridge is the way to go.... or like others said you can wait until Bulldozer comes out to see how it performs.

demonic_85
Well thy target different markets. In the whole the AMD is a cheaper alternative as you can find AM3 boards for what you would pay for a decent meal with your spouse. ($40-50) For a decent (as in able to OC) intel p67 motherboard your looking at $200. As your getting the 955BE for $120 and a capable mothrboard fo ~$60 you'll pay less for the MB CPU combo than you would by getting the 2500k and have a CPU fully capable to do most things, the 955BE will for most reach past 4Ghz pitting it against much more expencive CPU's as the i7 930. SO even if the best case from a Intel perspective (witch is what you try to tell here) can equally be said about AMD. The 955BE is a great performer with a unlock'ed multiplier made with OC'ing in mind witch sells for pocket money and paired with a cheap motherboard it's a competitor Intel have nothing to pit against when it comes to value. Ofc. the much more expencive Intels live with the performance crown, but as in a whole with ALL cost's includ. AMD have some serious offerings with the Phenom 2 9x5 BE's from a price vs. performance aspect.
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#18 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

I may add that the topic was actually about the i3 (dualcore) vs. a phenom 2 x4, this a very simple choise, the ph2 ofc.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/20

The i3 2100 is perhaps a dual-core however its 2 cores outperform the Phenom II's 4 cores. It's a more powerful CPU. It also has hyperthreading btw which can help with some programs easily outperforming the Phenom II X4.

And NO, it doesn't cost $200 for a decent P67 motherboard. Even a $140-160 P67 board is enough for overclocking a 2500k to 4.5Ghz or more.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#20 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/20

The i3 2100 is perhaps a dual-core however its 2 cores outperform the Phenom II's 4 cores. It's a more powerful CPU. It also has hyperthreading btw which can help with some programs easily outperforming the Phenom II X4.

And NO, it doesn't cost $200 for a decent P67 motherboard. Even a $140-160 P67 board is enough for overclocking a 2500k to 4.5Ghz or more.

Tezcatlipoca666

$160+220 = $380 $120+60 = $180 380 - 180 = $200 So even if the 2500k IS (witch is obvious) a better CPU it does play in a different ****price wise, in a narrow bugjet $200 is much money.

But apples to apples the 2100 witch is the direct competitor to 955BE is often a less performer.

In dualthreaded performance it's less performing than the Phenom 2 940, actually it's more often behind the Athlon 2 645 x4, the Ph2 955BE is simply often faster and will alow the user to freely OC it via the unlocked multiplier, the 2100 wont OC a single bit.

So add the CPU + MB combo for a $120 i3 2100 and $160 for a motherboard capable of OC'ing the k series later on.

And on the other side you got the $120 955BE and a moterboard with AM3+ capable of upgrading to the BullDozer for $60.

So your ending up paying $100 more for the i3 combo and get's less performance and no OC, does it sound like a great idea?

The 955 today is really a great value.

Here are some benchmarks, remeber the ph2 940 is a 3Ghz CPU otherwise it's identical to the sigthly better performing 3.2Ghz ph2 955.

Even if the 2100 in some scenarios beat out the phenom2's bu a margin the 955BE seems like an obvious choise since you actually can get another 20% performance of it with the blink of an eye and buying a combo you can upgrade later on cost $100 LESS than the 2100.

The 2100 isn't a bad CPU or it's not that far behind either (well while the 955BE isn't OC'ed that is) but how smart of a moove is it paying more to get the same or less performance?

Avatar image for wolverine_97
wolverine_97

613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 wolverine_97
Member since 2007 • 613 Posts
get sandy bridge because bulldozer obviously couldn't take the sandy bridge downfishing666
Can I borrow your time machine please?
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16910 Posts

bulldozer delayed not suprising...get sandy bridge. thank god i didn't wait for billdozer...still this really isnt good for consumers

Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
If the choice is between the i3 and the phenom, I would go with the phenom. 4 cores, mine OCs to 4ghz, plays everything with out a problem.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

stuff

swehunt

For starters, those benchmarks aren't games which is the critical comparison here. TC asked about gaming performance.

Concerning upgrade paths... you can get an H67 motherboard for $85 or a P67 for $100. The H67 bundled with the i5-2500 or i7-2600 is a pretty good upgrade path. You don't NEED to overclock. The P67 for $100 can overclock though, if that's what you want.

Edit: in case you guys haven't yet deduced it based on my avatar and posts in other threads... I'm playing devils advocate :P

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="fishing666"]get sandy bridge because bulldozer obviously couldn't take the sandy bridge downwolverine_97
Can I borrow your time machine please?

indeed!

you also need to rememebr that bulldozer is a brand new architrecture not a jacked up am2+ cpu ahahah

this means that you could be in for a delightful suprise.. benchmarks thus far show the quad core's able to pace or outpace intels flagship in mutli tasking and they also appear to show up the 2500k in both overclocking thresholds & fluid benchmarks (3d mark, pcmark, sandra)

i recommend avoiding talking smack until you have benchmarks of some validity that say otherwise..

i got real benchies from semi-reliable sources.. you got your mouth

now begon for a jump you and your whole crew

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpZUHNvFubg

Avatar image for wolverine_97
wolverine_97

613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 wolverine_97
Member since 2007 • 613 Posts

[QUOTE="wolverine_97"][QUOTE="fishing666"]get sandy bridge because bulldozer obviously couldn't take the sandy bridge downionusX

Can I borrow your time machine please?

indeed!

you also need to rememebr that bulldozer is a brand new architrecture not a jacked up am2+ cpu ahahah

this means that you could be in for a delightful suprise.. benchmarks thus far show the quad core's able to pace or outpace intels flagship in mutli tasking and they also appear to show up the 2500k in both overclocking thresholds & fluid benchmarks (3d mark, pcmark, sandra)

i recommend avoiding talking smack until you have benchmarks of some validity that say otherwise..

i got real benchies from semi-reliable sources.. you got your mouth

now begon for a jump you and your whole crew

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpZUHNvFubg

lol, well put
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
Well if you want future proof you need a quad core. Games like gta4 just don't run well on duals and as dual become more mainstream more games are going to need quads to run at their best.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

get the i3 Sandy Bridge as it is dirt cheap and just pair it with a board that will allow you to oc a i5 2500k in the future if you so choose to upgrade your cpu ....

currently I am waiting and saving up money in order to buy an i5 2500k cuz there is nothing out there that can beat its performance/value .... awesome cpu !!!

AMD right now is dead in my books

DeViLzzz
the fact of the matter is a quad core phenom smokes any dual core i3/i5 when things like rendering is involved. Sometimes core count is far more important that speed and for most things you can't even tell the difference between the amd and intel architecture. There is really no game out there that a phenom 2 can't max out. While the i5 is a great cpu amd just owns the budget market, there is no reason to buy a dual core over a quad when the cost the same, even the quad core athlon 2 beats the i3 at many things and that is much cheaper than the phenom.
Avatar image for middle-earth88
middle-earth88

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 middle-earth88
Member since 2006 • 1262 Posts

Dualcore = fail. Games simply want quad cores.