This topic is locked from further discussion.
I have both and I definately say The Witcher. The story is filled with a lot of decisions in the game that you have to make that alter most of the story, it carries a pretty mature setting and the combat is pretty fun and tactical.
You can't go wrong. Especially with the enhanced edition coming soon.
The Witcher.
Assassin's Creed is just a repetitive bore-fest IMO. Got it for Christmas (on 360) and havent even finished it yet; it sits on my shelf collecting dust.
[QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...Nibroc420
I think you are getting AC and the witcher mixed up, friend
I would say Assassin's Creed. A lot of people put it down and ignore its good points. I'll admit that it can get somewhat repetitive, but when you eventually master the controls it doesn't take that long to get through all the investigations. Other than that, the combat and the free-running aspects make it play unlike anything else. If you have patience you should enjoy it.
If you got The Witcher now and completed it, you might not be in the mood to play it all over again in a months time, when the updates arrive.
To the Thread Kreator: It's a tough choice methinks. The Witcher probably isn't as repetitive as Assassin's Creed. I haven't finished Assassin's Creed yet but so far, the story is much more interesting than that of The Witcher's. I think people really overrate the impact that choices have in The Witcher's story. I was expecting a whole lot more. Combat in The Witcher is unlike anything else before, though it's not as fluid as Assassin's Creed obviously, but it's still good & somewhat strategic.
If you absolutely must have one now, then I'd say go for Assassin's Creed & wait for that special version of The Witcher. There's also a Witcher demo out there in case you didn't know. Check it out when you get the chance. Good luck 8)
Can't comment on the PC version of AC, but from the 360 version I'd say you're better off going with The Witcher if you like RPGs. AC is really fun at first, and the "platforming" is really fun at the start, but once you hit the midway point, you'll probably start to get really bored with it. The Witcher is long and has a lot to do, but you may get bored with the combat if you're not playing on the hardest setting.
Hard to really compare them, but The Witcher was a suprise hit for me last year and AC was one of my biggest disappointments, so I may be a little biased. Even without the content patch for The Witcher was a better game that AC in my opinion, but I'd say you should at least download the demo for The Witcher, supposedly contains the prologue and the first chapter, so it should give you a really good feel of the game.
Can't comment on the PC version of AC, but from the 360 version I'd say you're better off going with The Witcher if you like RPGs. AC is really fun at first, and the "platforming" is really fun at the start, but once you hit the midway point, you'll probably start to get really bored with it. The Witcher is long and has a lot to do, but you may get bored with the combat if you're not playing on the hardest setting.
Hard to really compare them, but The Witcher was a suprise hit for me last year and AC was one of my biggest disappointments, so I may be a little biased. Even without the content patch The Witcher was a better game that AC in my opinion, but I'd say you should at least download the demo for The Witcher, supposedly contains the prologue and the first chapter, so it should give you a really good feel of the game.
[QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...Nibroc420
...I am starting to find AC's combat rather easy... as after I assassinate the main enemy I don't even bother running anymore and instead just kill all 20 or so enemies gathering around me.Rottenberry
Agreed. Also, you get a ton of health after only a few assassinations & combat gets easier with the unlockable moves. I would have liked it if they didn't give as many DNA Augmentations/health upgrades after every assassination.
On another note, does anyone know if it's possible to get a stealth kill on a main target instead of having to battle the target & 50 soldiers? I think I came pretty close to getting that Mad Doctor, but this dumbass crazy guy kept pushing me which made the guards suspicious of me even though I wasn't doing anything suspicious.
[QUOTE="A1B2C3CAL"]AC does look interesting!Qixote
and that is really all that is positive that can be said about it.
AC is good on paper but the combat...just...ruins it.
Plus the plot isnt nearly as good as I was hoping it to be. They pretty much jacked the whole concept of genetic memory from Frank Herbert....next thing you know AC2 will have the dude "awakened".
The Witcher is awesome, plain and simple. Enhanced Version? Dunno if its worth waiting for
I just did all of the investigations in the second memory block in AC and I can easily say that it's very, very repetitive. Especially with saving citizens. There's no different way to approach the investigations in the game and its freeroam which makes it even worse. The combat isn't something to wow about too. That also got repetitive and the lackluster AI doesn't help.
The game does have good parts though. I like the NPC reactions to your actions, I know that you learn new moves for the combat so I can't wait for that (hopefully the combat gets better), the story has interest, the game looks pretty stunning, and the acrobatics in the game are superb. But I was expecting a lot more. I was expecting some decent variety.
Again I just finished all of the investigations/side-quests on the second memory block only so my opinion will probably change once I play some more.
I just did all of the investigations in the second memory block in AC and I can easily say that it's very, very repetitive. Especially with saving citizens. There's no different way to approach the investigations in the game and that's pretty bad for a game that has free-roaming abliity. The combat isn't something to wow about too. That also got repetitive and the lackluster AI doesn't help.
The game does have good parts though. I like the NPC reactions to your actions, I know that you learn new moves for the combat so I can't wait for that (hopefully the combat gets better), the story has interest, the game looks pretty stunning, and the acrobatics in the game are superb. But I was expecting a lot more. I was expecting some decent variety.
Again I just finished all of the investigations/side-quests on the second memory block only so my opinion will probably change once I play some more.
Plus the plot isnt nearly as good as I was hoping it to be. They pretty much jacked the whole concept of genetic memory from Frank Herbert....next thing you know AC2 will have the dude "awakened".
mrbojangles25
You say that they were influenced by Herbert as it it were a bad thing.
[QUOTE="Rottenberry"]
...I am starting to find AC's combat rather easy... as after I assassinate the main enemy I don't even bother running anymore and instead just kill all 20 or so enemies gathering around me.Herrick
Agreed. Also, you get a ton of health after only a few assassinations & combat gets easier with the unlockable moves. I would have liked it if they didn't give as many DNA Augmentations/health upgrades after every assassination.
On another note, does anyone know if it's possible to get a stealth kill on a main target instead of having to battle the target & 50 soldiers? I think I came pretty close to getting that Mad Doctor, but this dumbass crazy guy kept pushing me which made the guards suspicious of me even though I wasn't doing anything suspicious.
You can kill every target in the game stealthily, if you take the right steps.
[QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...Nibroc420
the Witcher isnt a combat-centric game. Yes, it does have a lot of combat, but the bulk of the game consists of really good RPG stuff like dialogue, story, and characters.
The combat isnt great, but its good, and its certainly better than your typical dice-roll RPG stuff if you tend to favor more real-time combat mechanisms.
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...mrbojangles25
the Witcher isnt a combat-centric game. Yes, it does have a lot of combat, but the bulk of the game consists of really good RPG stuff like dialogue, story, and characters.
The combat isnt great, but its good, and its certainly better than your typical dice-roll RPG stuff if you tend to favor more real-time combat mechanisms.
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...mrbojangles25
the Witcher isnt a combat-centric game. Yes, it does have a lot of combat, but the bulk of the game consists of really good RPG stuff like dialogue, story, and characters.
The combat isnt great, but its good, and its certainly better than your typical dice-roll RPG stuff if you tend to favor more real-time combat mechanisms.
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]and a very good combat system that u wont get bored of...Rottenberry
the Witcher isnt a combat-centric game. Yes, it does have a lot of combat, but the bulk of the game consists of really good RPG stuff like dialogue, story, and characters.
The combat isnt great, but its good, and its certainly better than your typical dice-roll RPG stuff if you tend to favor more real-time combat mechanisms.
I felt that Mask of the Betrayer had much better dialogue and story than The Witcher and while the choices might not have been as strong the actual quest design was much better. I feel that the game in general is way underrated while The Witcher is slightly overrated. The main flaws of MotB are engine specific, I would enjoy it much more if it ran on the Infinity Engine or the ToEE engine. It also has something called the spirit meter, which isn't a huge problem unless your IQ is in the double digits and you are used to rest spam or the annoying Aurora habit of it having to play the game for you.
it seems they're very different games. one's a true rpg. the other's more of a sandbox game, like gta3. if you enjoy rpgs, then go with the witcher. if you enjoy gta3-type games, then go with assassin's creed.
or better yet, just get both. your hard-earned money will be well spent either way, i'd imagine.
I seriously think Mask of the Betrayer was the best Role Playing experience I've had in a long while.Rottenberry
Aye, too bad for me as I tried replaying it and it crashes on my new computer when I try to leave the burrow.
BTW Have you played Mass Effect?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation/2831-Zero-Punctuation-The-Witcher
There ya' go.Rottenberry
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation/4742-Zero-Punctuation-Condemned-2-Bloodshot
hehe, he didn't pass the first level of The Witcher here and makes a funny comment about it too.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment