This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Schumi7WDC
Schumi7WDC

1689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Schumi7WDC
Member since 2004 • 1689 Posts

I just got a couple year old Sony SACD/DVD changer from a friend that never even opened it, I plan on using it as a component in my home theater system primarily as a CD changer since I went with a higher end audio system and not a home theater in a box unit with a changer included.  I'm still kind of learning about all this stuff though, and I noticed the changer has a 6 cable 5.1 audio connection system, it also has a digital optical toslink connection.  \\

 Which one is better quality?   My home theater is a 7.1 surround system, and I know 6.1 and 7.1 have become more prevelant since this model changer was released, but does Toslink support 6.1 and 7.1 surround? I'm using HDMI with my newer equipment, and I kind of missed the couple years where 5.1, 6.1 and 7.1 started coming into dominance.  I just want to optimise this older component for what I can, so any help would be appreciated.  Thanks.

Avatar image for Kodai_kun
Kodai_kun

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kodai_kun
Member since 2005 • 1413 Posts
If you're just playing standard CDs, Toslink is probably your best bet You will only get the full benefit of SACD from the analog connections though, for copy protection reasons it will only pass the full hires signal through those
Avatar image for Schumi7WDC
Schumi7WDC

1689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Schumi7WDC
Member since 2004 • 1689 Posts
Thanks thats very helpful
Avatar image for mike7677
mike7677

2426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mike7677
Member since 2006 • 2426 Posts
When at all possible, always go for the single cable. Less likely it would get screwed up. Also, does that thing have digital coaxial? Choose that over Toslink(digital optical). Better bass response. Offtopic: Outc4st, I just love your kitten sig. :)
Avatar image for BlacKJaCK2290
BlacKJaCK2290

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 BlacKJaCK2290
Member since 2005 • 1775 Posts
[QUOTE="mike7677"]When at all possible, always go for the single cable. Less likely it would get screwed up. Also, does that thing have digital coaxial? Choose that over Toslink(digital optical). Better bass response. Offtopic: Outc4st, I just love your kitten sig. :)

Sure its less possible to get screwed up. But using the Multi Channel Outputs allows you to get the full resolution audio from those SACDS.
Avatar image for Kodai_kun
Kodai_kun

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kodai_kun
Member since 2005 • 1413 Posts

Also, does that thing have digital coaxial? Choose that over Toslink(digital optical). Better bass response

Toslink and digital coax are identical in every way once the data gets to the reciever. Neither one willl result in a better or worse signal. It's just a digital bitstream
Avatar image for BadAndy642
BadAndy642

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BadAndy642
Member since 2006 • 1069 Posts

Also, does that thing have digital coaxial? Choose that over Toslink(digital optical). Better bass responseKodai_kun

Toslink and digital coax are identical in every way once the data gets to the reciever. Neither one willl result in a better or worse signal. It's just a digital bitstream

Toslink goes through an extra conversion though.  It has to go from bit stream to a light pulse, then back to bit stream.  The advantage to it is that it is not susceptible to interference, while digital coax is.  But coax is a direct link without the the extra conversion.  So I always say that if your connection requires 2 meters or less use coax, but if you need more than 2 meters use toslink.

But for the guy's SACD player you have to use the 6 channel analog.

Avatar image for Kodai_kun
Kodai_kun

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Kodai_kun
Member since 2005 • 1413 Posts

Toslink goes through an extra conversion though. It has to go from bit stream to a light pulse, then back to bit stream. The advantage to it is that it is not susceptible to interference, while digital coax is. But coax is a direct link without the the extra conversion. So I always say that if your connection requires 2 meters or less use coax, but if you need more than 2 meters use toslink.

There is no conversion, light on=1, light off=0(or vice-versa) it's just a different representation of the same file.