XXXXXX

speedysam123

Follow

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 speedysam123

Member since 2012 • 124 Posts

Whats a better multiplayer game for multiplayer, Battlefield 2 or Battlefield bad company 2? I understand Battlefield 3 is probably better but my computer will not handle it.

12 years ago

skrat_01

Follow

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 skrat_01

Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

They're different. BF2 is more tactical and has a strategic layer. It's also a lot slower, combat is generally over longer distances, harder - and it's not quite as tight as BC2 (being years later). It also has far more scope and demands more cooperation. BC2 is a balance between COD run and gun and the Battlefield formula. Smaller maps, fraction of the player count, less vehicles. However it's a more intimate action focused game, that loses the strategic layer and big team coordination in favour of tight tactical teamwork. They're both great for their own reasons, however BF2 for its time was phenomenal, and still needs a proper successor (BF2142 was amazing too). BC2 probably holds up better because of this age difference, but ultimately it boils down to what kind of gameplay you want. Player count wise, I have NFI. Anyhoo, if your comp can't run BF3 then I'd be careful of BC2 - both games share the same engine.

12 years ago

Iantheone

Follow

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Iantheone

Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

BF2>BC2>BF3 imo. Not that any of them are bad, they are still some of the best MP FPS' you can get

12 years ago

ChubbyGuy40

Follow

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ChubbyGuy40

Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I'd say Battlefield 2. Surprised that people still play.

12 years ago

ionusX

Follow

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 ionusX

Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

I'd say Battlefield 2. Surprised that people still play.
ChubbyGuy40

as a person who owns both bf2 complete and bf2142 complete i prefer 2142 over 2 dat titan mode

12 years ago

nutcrackr

Follow

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#6 nutcrackr

Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

BF2 is a lot harder to get into, you will get destroyed early. Not to say that BC2 is an easy game to learn but the map structure and other elements make it easier for newer players to get some kills and action. BC2 requires a fairly beefy PC anyway.

12 years ago

Zebracal

Follow

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Zebracal

Member since 2013 • 56 Posts

If your pc can handle it then go with Bad Company 2. If not then you can choose Battlefield 2

12 years ago

Swiftstrike5

Follow

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#8 Swiftstrike5

Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts

I don't think BC2 will be much easier to run than BF3; they're both console games, so they both run on nearly decade old hardware.

12 years ago

dreamerdonkey

Follow

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 dreamerdonkey

Member since 2012 • 82 Posts

Battlefield 2 is much better than any other of game of this series. I don't know why but I still number of people who are playing Battlefield 2 is way more greater than Battlefied 3 or Battlefield 2 BC. May be old is gold is still apply able word for Battlefield 2. :D

12 years ago

nutcrackr

Follow

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#10 nutcrackr

Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

Battlefield 2 is much better than any other of game of this series. I don't know why but I still number of people who are playing Battlefield 2 is way more greater than Battlefied 3 or Battlefield 2 BC. May be old is gold is still apply able word for Battlefield 2. :D
dreamerdonkey

BF3 currently has around 10x more players than BF2...

12 years ago