Battlefield copying Call of Duty...

I wonder what the CoD haters will say about this...

It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.LoserMike

[QUOTE="LoserMike"]It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.FelipeInside

Battlefield 3 is the 8th "main" iteration from the start of the franchise in 2004 (BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF2, BF 2142, BF Modern Combat, BF Bad Company, BF Bad Company 2) so pretty much they sold 8 games in 8 years, is a 1 game x year in the franchise, and the news about arlterning MoH and BF doesn't surprise anymore.

But be honest: each new game did try to implement new concepts and enhance both the visuals and gameplay, whereas COD is in stale since COD 4 MW...

[QUOTE="LoserMike"]It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.FelipeInside

EA publishing...

EA pushes out new sports games ever year instead of updating them with a patch or some kind of DLC.

Sorry but EA had this model done before Activision.

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="LoserMike"]It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.Ondoval

Battlefield 3 is the 8th "main" iteration from the start of the franchise in 2004 (BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF2, BF 2142, BF Modern Combat, BF Bad Company, BF Bad Company 2) so pretty much they sold 8 games in 8 years, is a 1 game x year in the franchise, and the news about arlterning MoH and BF doesn't surprise anymore.

But be honest: each new game did try to implement new concepts and enhance both the visuals and gameplay, whereas COD is in stale since COD 4 MW...

It started in 2002 fyi. 9 years. But I do agree. At least you can tell Battlefield games apart from each other because they all try to do something different.

wasnt battleifeld 1942 out BEFORE cod1

wasnt battleifeld 1942 out BEFORE cod1

ionusX

I hope this works in the advantage of both CoD and BF. With yearly games coming out they may actually step up their game and both improve from it.

NO WAY!!! being a bf fan since bf2 i loved cod4 played it for 3years so ccomparing cod to bf is not right cod is more fast paced and bf is more on realistic then just for fun

NO WAY!!! being a bf fan since bf2 i loved cod4 played it for 3years so ccomparing cod to bf is not right cod is more fast paced and bf is more on realistic then just for fun

ZICO11

[QUOTE="LoserMike"]It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.FelipeInside

Yeah, because those are two totally identical series :roll:

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="LoserMike"]It's every other year, rather than every year like CoD. So unlike Activision, EA isn't dumping Battlefield on a secondary team like what Activision did to Infinity Ward. DICE will still be in control of the Battlefield series.Phoenix534

Yeah, because those are two totally identical series :roll:

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Every other year Battlefield, every other year Medal of Honor, so every year.... :-)FelipeInside

Yeah, because those are two totally identical series :roll:

But DICE doesn't make Medal of Honor. The only reason they did the MP in the last one was because Danger Close was still getting organized during the development.

Guys both EA and Activision couldn't care less about your little fanboyism. They are going to make money buy putting out cod and bf/mh yearly and you are going to give them your money and like it...frankopan

A BF game every two years. How is that copying CoD?....

BF and MoH are made by two different developers. Two years of development time for each game. While CoD is only a year. There's no copying.

I'll GLADLY welcome a BF game every two years.

I don't care, really. It is still better than Call Of Duty in my opinion and will definitely buy the third one. I don't hate Call Of Duty, but it looks too generic to me. I much prefer the arcade/sim feeling of the DiCE franchise, and their emphasis on teamwork.

A BF game every two years. How is that copying CoD?....

BF and MoH are made by two different developers. Two years of development time for each game. While CoD is only a year. There's no copying.

I'll GLADLY welcome a BF game every two years.

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

A BF game every two years. How is that copying CoD?....

BF and MoH are made by two different developers. Two years of development time for each game. While CoD is only a year. There's no copying.

I'll GLADLY welcome a BF game every two years.

kris9031998

Right. BUT, A CoD game comes out every year nevertheless. While with this BF and MoH which are diferent games will alternate. So this is still better.

Didnt we already came to a concensus that Activision is pure evil and EA is less so with some good faith towards pc.

I wonder what the CoD haters will say about this...

FelipeInside