Ive been playing this game for a couple of days and it seems to be pretty cool. Granted its nothing to marvel at visually, but it gets the job done. What are your opinions of this game? Is it worth it to buy the Battlefunds to bump up your guys?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ive been playing this game for a couple of days and it seems to be pretty cool. Granted its nothing to marvel at visually, but it gets the job done. What are your opinions of this game? Is it worth it to buy the Battlefunds to bump up your guys?
The gameplay is pretty good. Weapons shot and hit nicely, also handle well. Maps are good. Vehicle combat is fun, and visuals are meh. What you expect for F2P tho
Papadrach
It's awful. Hit detection is incredibly bad. Everything about the game is bland, and doesn't have any of the fun i felt in other battlefield games.tehsystemwariorWhat's the difference between this and one of the paid ones?
The shooting is vastly improved in F2P. In battlefield 2 the guns are absolutely wack for lack of a better word. No one even uses them anymore. They just run around with rocket launchers instead. I think that's what they do in real combat too though right?I already own BF2.
Drazule
[QUOTE="Papadrach"]The gameplay is pretty good. Weapons shot and hit nicely, also handle well. Maps are good. Vehicle combat is fun, and visuals are meh. What you expect for F2P tho
FelipeInside
It's awful. Hit detection is incredibly bad. Everything about the game is bland, and doesn't have any of the fun i felt in other battlefield games.tehsystemwariorWhat's the difference between this and one of the paid ones? It lacks any polish, feels boring, looks dull and plays dull. Doesnt have the smoothness, graphics or gameplay of the newer shooters or even BF2 imo. And you are limited to only to classes and can't switch mid game. And it being a "free to play game" is a bad excuse. The idea behind it is to make money, it should be just as good as any other, I havent played it since launch, but the biggest turn-off for me was the lag, and no dedicated server browser. The lag may have been fixed if more people play, but i have no doubt it still bad.
Its a great little game. You can play without paying anything, the graphics are really nice for a browser game, the gameplay is smooth, the matchmaking is pretty much instant, it has the battlefield feel, the vechicles are great and most importantly (although it can be seen as a bad thing by some) its alot easier to shoot someone than in BF2. I love being the medic as much as I did in the original BF2. Still in the long run it may be a bit too easy. In BF2 I am an avarage player I think, in BFP4F Im pretty much always on top.
i dont think this game will do well because i believe most people will just play without spending real life money. if you dont spend real life money, you're bound to 2 character slots. which means you can only play as 2 classes. and there may be a possibility that you play a game where your entire team will be composed of all medics. and you cant switch classes until the match ends.
i dont think this game will do well because i believe most people will just play without spending real life money. if you dont spend real life money, you're bound to 2 character slots. which means you can only play as 2 classes. and there may be a possibility that you play a game where your entire team will be composed of all medics. and you cant switch classes until the match ends.
boybrushdred
Ive played for a few hours and I have to say that the problem with one class teams is a bit overblown. The matches I have played was quite balanced. Quite frankly there were less snipers than in a typical BF2 match. As for the money issue I read somewhere that F2P game makers expect only 10% of the players to actually spend money and apprently that is more than enough to justify the game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment