battleifeld 3 adjusted beta requirements and up they go!

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

the ebta requirements have been adjsuted for battlefield 3

here they are:

miimum:

vista 32-bit

core 2 duo 2.4ghz/ athlon x2 2.7ghz

2gb ram

hd 3870 or better/nvidia 8800gt or better

recommended:

windows 7 64-bit

4gb ram

any quad core cpu (intel or amd)

gtx 560 (no ti)/ hd 6950 (1gb)

game-debate adjusted system requirements (based on game-debates assesment of a playing of the game, what you would need for medium or high (varying on reso.))

win7 64-bit

4gb ram

any core 2 quad 2.1ghz or better/ amd phenom I x4 9650 or better

amd hd 3870 / nvidia 9800gtx+

as you can see dx9 has been done away with, and so has support for the hd 2000 series.

http://www.game-debate.com/news/?news=1002&game=Battlefield%203&title=Battlefield%203%20System%20Requirements%20-%20Beta

Avatar image for CUDGEdave
CUDGEdave

2597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 CUDGEdave
Member since 2010 • 2597 Posts

Excellent,I should have no trouble running that on my little beast!:D

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
Shame its just operation metro again like the Alpha. Hopefully the destruction and squad spawning will be working correctly this time.
Avatar image for brandojones
brandojones

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 brandojones
Member since 2005 • 3103 Posts

Medium/high maybe...? I'll be playing on the 29th if the servers aren't totally overloaded which I'm expecting...

Resolution: 1920x1080

CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 720 2.8GHz (4 core)

GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked 896MB

Memory: G.Skill 4GB 1066

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
Looks like it requires 2 gtx 580s for ultra. Might be time for me to upgrade. Gtx 580s going cheap on ebay right now.
Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
Got a Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.7ghz with a 5850, hopefully I can run this at decent resolution.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#7 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Looks like it requires 2 gtx 580s for ultra. Might be time for me to upgrade. Gtx 580s going cheap on ebay right now.i5750at4Ghz
Do you have a PSU capable of that now?

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
I am barely above the requirements. :(
Avatar image for Technomancer82
Technomancer82

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Technomancer82
Member since 2011 • 215 Posts
Excellent, can't wait to play this!
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Looks like it requires 2 gtx 580s for ultra. Might be time for me to upgrade. Gtx 580s going cheap on ebay right now.mitu123

Do you have a PSU capable of that now?

Yup. Been planing on the upgrade for a year now, but there was nothing to force my hand.
Avatar image for klusps
klusps

10386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#11 klusps
Member since 2005 • 10386 Posts

Nice just meet the recommended requirements.

Avatar image for caseystryker
caseystryker

5421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 caseystryker
Member since 2005 • 5421 Posts
It will be interesting to see how well ill be able run it.
Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
Excellent I should run the open beta just fine on high settings. =D
Avatar image for murekkep
murekkep

761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#14 murekkep
Member since 2005 • 761 Posts
Would a 560Ti enough for it?
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

My GPU is just under the reccomended, but I plan on upgrading to the best single GPU card next gen so no worries.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#16 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

I figure the game (final release) it will change again.

I figure the game will have close to the same requirements as BFBC2, except with the GPU, the GPU will be taxed a little more, but honestly not a whole lot more. I have a Phenom II 945, 4 gigs of DDR2 ram, and a GTX570, I expect to be able to Max it at 1080p, or atleast run it on High at great framerate... If not, I may just pass on it. Until I get a better rig. (and no I won't be missing out, tons of other games, and if BF3 is that good, it will still have a large community when I go to get it)

Avatar image for CDudu
CDudu

694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 CDudu
Member since 2007 • 694 Posts

Why a 6950 (1Gb) is the same as 560?

6950 is even better than a 560 Ti...

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#18 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I hit the high. A GTX 470 is more powerful than the GTX 560. I think my i7 930 will eat this game alive.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#19 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Why a 6950 (1Gb) is the same as 560?

6950 is even better than a 560 Ti...

CDudu

EA works with Nvidia more. Their engine's are usually bit better optimized for Nvidia cards.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="CDudu"]

Why a 6950 (1Gb) is the same as 560?

6950 is even better than a 560 Ti...

i5750at4Ghz

Maybe you're thinking of the 6970 cause a 6950 isn't faster than a gtx 560.

I know that the GTX570 trades blows and even beats in several games the HD6970 (2gb).

I expect the GTX560 and the HD6950 would trade blows as well.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="CDudu"]

Why a 6950 (1Gb) is the same as 560?

6950 is even better than a 560 Ti...

Lach0121

Maybe you're thinking of the 6970 cause a 6950 isn't faster than a gtx 560.

I know that the GTX570 trades blows and even beats in several games the HD6970 (2gb).

I expect the GTX560 and the HD6950 would trade blows as well.

560 (no ti) is much closer the the 6870 than the 6950.

in fact it probably would be fair to compare it to the hd 5870

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#23 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Maybe you're thinking of the 6970 cause a 6950 isn't faster than a gtx 560.ionusX

I know that the GTX570 trades blows and even beats in several games the HD6970 (2gb).

I expect the GTX560 and the HD6950 would trade blows as well.

560 (no ti) is much closer the the 6870 than the 6950.

in fact it probably would be fair to compare it to the hd 5870

Sorry I was thinking of the GTX560 TI

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#25 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,Birdy09

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#26 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
lol i actually meet the minimum requirements
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,Lach0121

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

You're going to not play a game because you can't run it at max settings?
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#28 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,SF_KiLLaMaN

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

You're going to not play a game because you can't run it at max settings?

No I am going to WAIT on a game for A. I want to play it how I want.

B. because there are plenty of other great games, that I can play how I want.

Like I said in a previous post, I won't be missing out on anythign, if it is good, it will still have a large community when I go to play it.

It isn't that difficult of a concept to grasp.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

Lach0121

You're going to not play a game because you can't run it at max settings?

No I am going to WAIT, on a game for A. I want to play it how I want.

and B. because there are plenty of other great games, that I can play how I want.

It isn't that difficult of a concept to grasp.

Still. Waiting on a game because you can't get the best graphics doesn't make much sense. usually games are played to have fun, not stare at pretty graphics. If that was your deciding factor to wait on it then I don't think you really wanted the game right away in the first place.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
I am the reccomended specs.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#31 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] You're going to not play a game because you can't run it at max settings? SF_KiLLaMaN

No I am going to WAIT, on a game for A. I want to play it how I want.

and B. because there are plenty of other great games, that I can play how I want.

It isn't that difficult of a concept to grasp.

Still. Waiting on a game because you can't get the best graphics doesn't make much sense. usually games are played to have fun, not stare at pretty graphics. If that was your deciding factor to wait on it then I don't think you really wanted the game right away in the first place.

Well It isn't at the top of my list...

If you really must know why I choose to do this, to ease your mind..

I am actually getting tired of Military FPS lately, and wouldn't mind a break. Over satuation lately.

I am looking more towards Rage, SWTOR, Diablo III, and Batman for games that are coming out.

I have plenty of games already that I haven't finished, that I should.

I wasn't planning on getting it right away period. If the performance is like stated above, then that is extra icing on the cake.

Now I must say, if there is anymore "still" it is on you.

Avatar image for sailor232
sailor232

6880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 sailor232
Member since 2003 • 6880 Posts

Im far and above those requirements so far, no problems for me. Still cant wait for the final game requirements.

Avatar image for BONK-
BONK-

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 BONK-
Member since 2011 • 58 Posts
Nice i have the acer predator so i should have no problems playing it on max :)
Avatar image for cabose38
cabose38

1162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 cabose38
Member since 2005 • 1162 Posts

New Meme/ Forum topic for the rest of the year:

But can it run BF3?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
Nice i have the acer predator so i should have no problems playing it on max :)BONK-
The most powerful Acer predator only has a single GTX 570, and a last generation i7. Which is frankly a huge rip off considering it costs $1900.
Avatar image for caseystryker
caseystryker

5421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 caseystryker
Member since 2005 • 5421 Posts

I'm still worried about how well my 5830 will be able to handle it.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

I'm still worried about how well my 5830 will be able to handle it.

caseystryker
Try having an 8800GTX :P
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

I have a 6870 and play at 1440x900. Does it matter much?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="caseystryker"]

I'm still worried about how well my 5830 will be able to handle it.

SF_KiLLaMaN
Try having an 8800GTX :P

you will probably be all right for medium.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="caseystryker"]

I'm still worried about how well my 5830 will be able to handle it.

ferret-gamer

Try having an 8800GTX :P

you will probably be all right for medium.

That's what I'm hoping. I'm going to try to get the money to upgrade to a Core 2 Quad sometime next month. It should run better then. Even with my old GPU.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#42 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Anyone knows how well 2 GTX 460s would do? I heard High.

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#43 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11623 Posts

I'm in trouble till I upgrade my CPU. Hurry you damn Bulldozers!

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I'm in trouble till I upgrade my CPU. Hurry you damn Bulldozers!

with_teeth26
They'll be in October at the earliest.
Avatar image for Endgame_basic
Endgame_basic

950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Endgame_basic
Member since 2002 • 950 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,Lach0121

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

I've never quite understood this frame of mind. If BF3 at med-high looks better than any game ever made than you'd pass on it because you can't run it on Ultra?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#46 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,Endgame_basic

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

I've never quite understood this frame of mind. If BF3 at med-high looks better than any game ever made than you'd pass on it because you can't run it on Ultra?

It's Ultra or nothing.:P

Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
ShoTTyMcNaDeS

2784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Member since 2011 • 2784 Posts

the ebta requirements have been adjsuted for battlefield 3

here they are:

miimum:

vista 32-bit

core 2 duo 2.4ghz/ athlon x2 2.7ghz

2gb ram

hd 3870 or better/nvidia 8800gt or better

recommended:

windows 7 64-bit

4gb ram

any quad core cpu (intel or amd)

gtx 560 (no ti)/ hd 6950 (1gb)

game-debate adjusted system requirements (based on game-debates assesment of a playing of the game, what you would need for medium or high (varying on reso.))

win7 64-bit

4gb ram

any core 2 quad 2.1ghz or better/ amd phenom I x4 9650 or better

amd hd 3870 / nvidia 9800gtx+

as you can see dx9 has been done away with, and so has support for the hd 2000 series.

http://www.game-debate.com/news/?news=1002&game=Battlefield%203&title=Battlefield%203%20System%20Requirements%20-%20Beta

ionusX

So as a newer PC gamer am I to assume that my Dell XPS will be able to handle this game pretty well? It has an i-7 2620 2.7 GHz processor, 6 GB RAM, Nvidia GT540M, DX 11 support, 1366 x 768 max resolution and Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#48 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Some of the denial is great, this wont be maxed on our current generation cards.... well, not with 1080p+ 60fps + ... nowhere near,Endgame_basic

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

I've never quite understood this frame of mind. If BF3 at med-high looks better than any game ever made than you'd pass on it because you can't run it on Ultra?

lol I elaborated earlier, you don't have to understand it, there are plenty of other games to hold me over, I don't quite understand why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp.... So I guess we both don't quite understand some things.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="Endgame_basic"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

Lach0121

I've never quite understood this frame of mind. If BF3 at med-high looks better than any game ever made than you'd pass on it because you can't run it on Ultra?

lol I elaborated earlier, you don't have to understand it, there are plenty of other games to hold me over, I don't quite understand why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp.... So I guess we both don't quite understand some things.

It's hard because your original post clearly doesn't explain what you actually meant. Your original post makes it sound like that is the only reason you're going to be waiting for the game. it's not that we can't grasp what you mean, it's that you didn't portray what you meant well enough. They must have skipped over the posts where you explained yourself.
Avatar image for Endgame_basic
Endgame_basic

950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Endgame_basic
Member since 2002 • 950 Posts

[QUOTE="Endgame_basic"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

IF This to be true, I may just pass it up for a while, and I do mean IF. If not, then who is in denial? lol (gtx 2 series seems to run BFBC2 just fine)

Lach0121

I've never quite understood this frame of mind. If BF3 at med-high looks better than any game ever made than you'd pass on it because you can't run it on Ultra?

lol I elaborated earlier, you don't have to understand it, there are plenty of other games to hold me over, I don't quite understand why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp.... So I guess we both don't quite understand some things.

You didn't elaborate on anything. You essentially just side-stepped the subject, like you're doing here.

Plenty of games to hold you over till you can play BF3 on Ultra right? lol