This is probably a 'noob' question, but what would be the benefits of running 2 hard-drives over 1? I'm debating on getting 2 500GB drives or 1 1TB drive.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Because there's no benefit of running two 500GB over a single 1TB drive unless you're using a RAID.There was no question about RAID, so why are you two addressing that?
fib112
Originally I had a 2nd HDD (the 500GB) as an easy upgrade to install programs/games on (my main HDD was an 160GB and getting crowded). Eventually I replaced the 160GB with 1TB, so the 500GB remained as a drive to back up files from my laptop such as music/documents.
But generally, A 1TB drive is fine, two drives aren't really necessary.
Actually the comments of RAID helped me out as I didnt know what it even was at the time. When I format my HDD will I have the option of what RAID setting to set it to? I decided to go with a SeaGate 1TB model, thanks for the help all. :)
Cry0Tek
you might; you might not. Many self/custom built computers will have RAID. most consumer pre-built computers (Dell, HP, etc) do not.
I still stick to the habit of having my OS on the main (SATA) hard drive while I keep a large permanent pagefile on the secondary hard drive (EIDE) only. Windows (from 3.1 to 7) always seemed to run smoother for me.
I also keep a lot of downloads/backups/virtualization stuff on the secondary drive just in case the main drive bites the dust.
With that setup, the rate of fragmentation on my main drive seems a lot slower.
If you only bought one drive than you can't set up a RAID. A RAID requires at least 2, 3, or 4 disks to operate, depending on the type of RAID.Actually the comments of RAID helped me out as I didnt know what it even was at the time. When I format my HDD will I have the option of what RAID setting to set it to? I decided to go with a SeaGate 1TB model, thanks for the help all. :)
Cry0Tek
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment