After having recently doing some homework on televisions, I kinda noticed that all four of those t.v.s are filled with a bunch of "eye grabbing" buzzwords. Stuff like 600Hz (where the human eye can't tell past 240Hz), "blazing fast response times of 6 ms" (fast, but I've seen them much lower), "dynamic" contrast ratios of certain high numbers (where it's the static or native that matter most). I'm sure they are nice t.v.s, but there are probably a few better ones if you don't mind spending another $100 or so. I've seen some really nice ones right at the $800 mark, but after tax, it'd go up a bit. Of the ones listed above however, I'm kinda leaning towards one of the plasmas. I'd look around a bit more if I were you and stay away from those t.v.s with a lot of "buzzwords" if at all possible.
joseph_mach
No, I totally agree with your point regarding "buzz words" but that's definitely not what spurred my interest in the above televisions. I just like the size of those televisions and their prices. But I'm really having trouble deciding between plasma and LCD.
I definitely have played on my parents' plasma and the picture was amazing and vivid. Actually, playing on that plasma was probably the best picture of any television I've ever played on. However, the interface of Hitman left a ghosting or a burn-in in the television, which totally freaked me out (and them; the plasma was like $10,000 or something ridiculous). I don't know I've always had it engrained in my mind that plasmas aren't ideal for gaming. The way they should be "broken in" for the first 100 hours, always have that tendency for burn-in, will only last so many years because of the gas inside gradually fading, and most being only 720 is definitely a turn off.
Log in to comment