Black Ops 2 multiplayer really is not a massive turd.

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

So I decided to pick this up "used" on console this afternoon. I have had my issues with the COD games but still found them to be pretty fun and of decent quality for the most part.

But Blaks Ops 2....wow. What a turd of a game. I'm not sure if it's because I have been playing so much BF3 on PC or what but I'm taking this game back to gamestop. I was not expecting amazing graphics with it being on console and all but to me it seems like everything from the maps to the art direction and animations have just gone to crap.

I don't know...maybe it's always been a turd and I'm just noticing it now because I have been away from it for a while.

Did a different team do this latest game or what?

EDIT: IT's not as bad as I thought.

Avatar image for Phelaidar
Phelaidar

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Phelaidar
Member since 2005 • 1533 Posts

So I decided to pick this up "used" on console this afternoon. I have had my issues with the COD games but still found them to be pretty fun and of decent quality for the most part.

But Blaks Ops 2....wow. What a turd of a game. I'm not sure if it's because I have been playing so much BF3 on PC or what but I'm taking this game back to gamestop. I was not expecting amazing graphics with it being on console and all but to me it seems like everything from the maps to the art direction and animations have just gone to crap.

I don't know...maybe it's always been a turd and I'm just noticing it now because I have been away from it for a while.

Did a different team do this latest game or what?

BSC14

I actually thought it looked better than the other CODs... so I think you're noticing that now because your standards got higher.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#3 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
imo bo2 looks good / great on PC. I was pleasantly surprised with how far they have pushed the old engines. Some of the character models are excellent and the future environments are very sharp. Runs extremely well too. I barely played a few hours of mp. I think I've just kinda been burnt on the series after MW3.
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#4 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

everyone should know activision rule on making a map

 

"It must 3 ways to get around the map nothing more nothing else."

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
Decent graphics, terribly unbalanced MP. Too many easy ways to get kills and using anything but SMGs is handicapping yourself.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

everyone should know activision rule on making a map

 

"It must 3 ways to get around the map nothing more nothing else."

k2theswiss

You must be new to FPSs, people hate CoD maps recently because you don't have maps with only a few paths, like every single FPS out there, even BF 3.

 

I don't know what BO2 you played, but the one I got was excellent.

 

 

Found it, imma just leave this here, straight from the haters.

[spoiler]

25Qhp.png

What they did with BO 2 was to tone down on the numerous paths, because whiners couldn't take it and they ended up with something between the insecurity of MW 3 and the security of your random shooter with 2 paths, 3 at most.

[/spoiler]

Avatar image for deactivated-5f768591970d3
deactivated-5f768591970d3

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-5f768591970d3
Member since 2004 • 1255 Posts

I really like BLOPS multiplayer. Ill admit Im a COD fan and I still think the original MW was the best. But BLOPS 2 is way better than BLOPS 1. And I prefer BLOPS to BF3 anyday. They really are just very different games, but I like fast paced run and gun.

 

On the SMGs. I refuse to use them for the most part. I have a 2.2 overall ratio using the first shotgun, a mix of assault rifles, light machine guns and the first sniper. So its not SMG or nothing, you just have to know how to play different ways. With the shotgun, the skill is in closing the distance to an opponent as well as possible and using corners to your advantage.

 

Anyways, I like the multi quite a bit. I have 70 hours in or so, I have not one minute in the single player game so I cant comment.

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

I really like BLOPS multiplayer. Ill admit Im a COD fan and I still think the original MW was the best. But BLOPS 2 is way better than BLOPS 1. And I prefer BLOPS to BF3 anyday. They really are just very different games, but I like fast paced run and gun.

 

On the SMGs. I refuse to use them for the most part. I have a 2.2 overall ratio using the first shotgun, a mix of assault rifles, light machine guns and the first sniper. So its not SMG or nothing, you just have to know how to play different ways. With the shotgun, the skill is in closing the distance to an opponent as well as possible and using corners to your advantage.

 

Anyways, I like the multi quite a bit. I have 70 hours in or so, I have not one minute in the single player game so I cant comment.

ankor77
But the point is that if you were to use SMGs it would be a lot easier for you. I had a high 1.something kdr IIRC. I played using nothing but the crossbow and pistols. Was fun for a while
Avatar image for deactivated-5f768591970d3
deactivated-5f768591970d3

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5f768591970d3
Member since 2004 • 1255 Posts

 

But the point is that if you were to use SMGs it would be a lot easier for you. I had a high 1.something kdr IIRC. I played using nothing but the crossbow and pistols. Was fun for a while

 

You are probably right, but it doesn't ruin the game for me. Every player complains when someone uses a weapon they dont use. I get so much grief for using shotty as my primary. Then if I snipe I am a camper.....Its domination, camping a point is kinda part of the game....

 

I don't begrudge anyone for using something the designers created. Target finders as well...Its in the game, go ahead and use em.

Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

BO2 is really cod 4 with a makeover. as is all COD games. moneymakers i call them. once youve played one youve played them all. 

Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]

everyone should know activision rule on making a map

"It must 3 ways to get around the map nothing more nothing else."

DanielDust

You must be new to FPSs, people hate CoD maps recently because you don't have maps with only a few paths, like every single FPS out there, even BF 3.

I don't know what BO2 you played, but the one I got was excellent.

Found it, imma just leave this here, straight from the haters.

[spoiler]

25Qhp.png

What they did with BO 2 was to tone down on the numerous paths, because whiners couldn't take it and they ended up with something between the insecurity of MW 3 and the security of your random shooter with 2 paths, 3 at most.

[/spoiler]

To each his own I guess. The BO2 I got looked terrible, all the weapons feel the same and the maps were crazy boring...this is just my opinion of course. IMO the quality is WAY below BF3....you can't can't compare.

Avatar image for Wolfetan
Wolfetan

7522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Wolfetan
Member since 2010 • 7522 Posts

The whole game is terrible. Played it at my friends and am glad I did not buy it, because I would've been extremely dissapointed spending $60 on a game my friends baby brother could've made.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts

I was a cod fan I loved cod4 WatW and MW2 but every cod since mw2 blows chunks. The lag in the recent cods is unbarable. The maps are horrible. It's almost as if the developers are trying to make the weapons as useless as possible. After 130 days of playtime with the cod series I'm done with it. I will never play another cod again it's junk.

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#14 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts

I thought it had some potential the first day or two, then after playing all maps and tooling around with all the weapons, I realized it was just another CQC cluster**** with SMG's ruling the day.  Blops 1 maps were bad enough.. I didn't think they'd manage to make em even smaller and more random.

I'm more a fan of MW1 and MW2 since the way the maps are designed, you have more control over the flow of battle instead of running around like a chicken with its head cut off and shooting whatever pops up.

But yeah.. Blops 2 is pretty bad. 

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Guess I totally disagree with most here. I wasn't going to get Blops 2 but my friends wanted me to come play with them. So far about 120hrs clocked on MP. Probably the best CoD after COD4 or even Modern Warfare 1. Does it do anything different? A few things here and there, but it's great fun with friends.
Avatar image for theshadowhunter
theshadowhunter

2956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 theshadowhunter
Member since 2004 • 2956 Posts

It's ok for a brainless FPS IMHO, but it gets boring after a while and the DLC packs will split the community...

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

 

ankor77

But the point is that if you were to use SMGs it would be a lot easier for you. I had a high 1.something kdr IIRC. I played using nothing but the crossbow and pistols. Was fun for a while

 

You are probably right, but it doesn't ruin the game for me. Every player complains when someone uses a weapon they dont use. I get so much grief for using shotty as my primary. Then if I snipe I am a camper.....Its domination, camping a point is kinda part of the game....

 

I don't begrudge anyone for using something the designers created. Target finders as well...Its in the game, go ahead and use em.

I dont really mind, but dont think you are goodjust cause you can get a good score with them
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Any idea when they're going to stop using an engine from 1999?

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

Bad maps. Small maps. SMG hipe fire fest (everything else is useless except maybe one or two assault rifles). Forced to prestige to unlock everything (perks, guns, equipment, etc)

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
I use M8A1 and SMG kiddies don't stand a chance.
Avatar image for ravenguard90
ravenguard90

3064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ravenguard90
Member since 2005 • 3064 Posts

I use M8A1 and SMG kiddies don't stand a chance. DevilMightCry

FAL with select fire here. Trying to get diamond SMG's atm, but whenever I get bored, I just switch to that gun and pwn for a few :P

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
I use M8A1 and SMG kiddies don't stand a chance. DevilMightCry
There are some exceptions, but I stopped playing 2 weeks after launch and all I remember is SMG + laser sight hip fire being a beast.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Any idea when they're going to stop using an engine from 1999?

kraken2109
I really don't mind cause each COD that comes out looks better than the last. It's also a risk for them to start with a new engine, since they have optimized this one for each game type. Still, I believe they are waiting for next-gen to move engines.
Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#24 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

Guess I totally disagree with most here. I wasn't going to get Blops 2 but my friends wanted me to come play with them. So far about 120hrs clocked on MP. Probably the best CoD after COD4 or even Modern Warfare 1. Does it do anything different? A few things here and there, but it's great fun with friends.FelipeInside

 

CoD4 is Modern Warfare 1

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Any idea when they're going to stop using an engine from 1999?

kraken2109
If you're trying to say something bad, don't do it by saying something good, in this case, calling BO 2 amazing for it being on such a dated engine.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Any idea when they're going to stop using an engine from 1999?

DanielDust
If you're trying to say something bad, don't do it by saying something good, in this case, calling BO 2 amazing for it being on such a dated engine.

this. i complained a lot 3-4 years ago for it being on that damn engine, but now i find it extremely impressive that the most popular series in the western world is on such an old engine.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Guess I totally disagree with most here. I wasn't going to get Blops 2 but my friends wanted me to come play with them. So far about 120hrs clocked on MP. Probably the best CoD after COD4 or even Modern Warfare 1. Does it do anything different? A few things here and there, but it's great fun with friends.Masenkoe

 

CoD4 is Modern Warfare 1

LOL, that's true, my bad. I get confused which came where after they stopped with the numbers....
Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts
It took a little bit for BLOPS2 to grow up me, now I find it a lot of fun to sit back and play. Playing with the rifles and SMGs is way too easy, I took a note from Zubin and made a Pistol only class and so far I've place 1st in every game using that class.
Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

[QUOTE="Masenkoe"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Guess I totally disagree with most here. I wasn't going to get Blops 2 but my friends wanted me to come play with them. So far about 120hrs clocked on MP. Probably the best CoD after COD4 or even Modern Warfare 1. Does it do anything different? A few things here and there, but it's great fun with friends.FelipeInside

CoD4 is Modern Warfare 1

LOL, that's true, my bad. I get confused which came where after they stopped with the numbers....

Ok so after reading all these opinions I decided to look it up on youtube and watch some videos in HD. It looked WAY better than the 360 version from what I could see and so after watching about an hour worth of youtube I decided to to buy it on PC.

Let me say this, I don't know if something was wrong with my copy of BO2 on xbox or what (I did get a few read disk errors also) but the PC version is MUCH better. I would not say it looks amazing but it looks a whole lot better than the 360 version and the added mouse vs controller made a massive difference.

That said there are a couple things that I don't like....no choke points on the maps is one thing. I find choke points a lot of fun personally. Also I can't really tell the difference between the guns....they all fee the same to me. And overall the game feels very old as far as game play goes.

It's not the turd I thought it was but it's just more casual than BF3 which I have been playing a lot lately.

EDIT: Oh and the animations have gotten worse...imo anyway.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Masenkoe"]

 

CoD4 is Modern Warfare 1

BSC14

LOL, that's true, my bad. I get confused which came where after they stopped with the numbers....

Ok so after reading all these opinions I decided to look it up on youtube and watch some videos in HD. It looked WAY better than the 360 version from what I could see and so after watching about an hour worth of youtube I decided to to buy it on PC.

Let me say this, I don't know if something was wrong with my copy of BO2 on xbox or what (I did get a few read disk errors also)but the PC version is MUCH better. I would not say it looks amazing but it looks a whole lot better than the 360 version and the added mouse vs controller made a massive difference.

That said there are a couple things that I don't like....no choke points on the maps is one thing. I find choke points a lot of fun personally. Also I can't really tell the difference between the guns....they all fee the same to me.And overall the game feels very old as far as game play goes.

It's not the turd I thought it was but it's just more casual than BF3 which I have been playing a lot lately.

EDIT: Oh and the animations have gotten worse...imo anyway.

LOL, that happens with 99% of games.

There ARE choke points on map, you just haven't played enough maybe.

Again maybe you haven't played enough but I can tell the difference, even within a same group.Gameplay is same old same old COD, nothing new or revolutionary, although the addition of robots is nice, and not OP like everybody thought they would be.

Not a turd by any means, and yes it might be more casual to the common eye but I'm going for Diamond Camo and it's gets "interesting" trying to unlock everything.

To me they are the same and fine.

(YES, I love colours)

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#31 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Any idea when they're going to stop using an engine from 1999?

FelipeInside

I really don't mind cause each COD that comes out looks better than the last.

You mean slightly better than the last. I can't tell a difference between MW2 and MW3 for example, though MW3 is slightly better in areas. Thankfully BO2 actually made a push in graphics in the series since COD4.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]I use M8A1 and SMG kiddies don't stand a chance. ravenguard90

FAL with select fire here. Trying to get diamond SMG's atm, but whenever I get bored, I just switch to that gun and pwn for a few :P

FAL is good if you have faster reflexes even on single fire. I used for a while. I use select fire with M8A1, with grip, and either fmj or quick aim. But I only play on HC. I did play a lot of SMG in the beginning, but I always liked the feel of the AR's better. AN94 feels awesome to kill with, but has a bigger recoil.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Good lord I can't believe people are actually saying Blops 2 has good graphics. It looks no better then the last 4 games..
Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

Good lord I can't believe people are actually saying Blops 2 has good graphics. It looks no better then the last 4 games..Jebus213
BO2 graphics are fine. They are not great, but the graphics are just fine and do not distract when playing. Sorry to break it to you, but people play COD for game play mostly and the addictive unlocks and perks.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
people play COD for game play mostly and the addictive unlocks and perks.DevilMightCry
That's incredibly sad..
Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]people play COD for game play mostly and the addictive unlocks and perks.Jebus213
That's incredibly sad..

It's sad to you that there are people that like a game for gameplay? It's obvious you're just trolling now. I don't have the highest opinion of COD series but I find comments like yours quite childish and unproductive.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]people play COD for game play mostly and the addictive unlocks and perks.DevilMightCry
That's incredibly sad..

It's sad to you that there are people that like a game for gameplay? It's obvious you're just trolling now. I don't have the highest opinion of COD series but I find comments like yours quite childish and unproductive.

How am I trolling? Since when in the hell did perks and unlocks mean the entire gameplay? I find it sad that people rely on unlocks and perks just have fun in a video game. Once upon a time there weren't any perks and unlocks in CoD...
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"][QUOTE="Jebus213"] That's incredibly sad..

It's sad to you that there are people that like a game for gameplay? It's obvious you're just trolling now. I don't have the highest opinion of COD series but I find comments like yours quite childish and unproductive.

How am I trolling? Since when in the hell did perks and unlocks mean the entire gameplay? I find it sad that people rely on unlocks and perks just have fun in a video game. Once upon a time there weren't any perks and unlocks in CoD...

What are you talking about? Persk and Unlocks are just sort of a light RPG element to it, and gives more variety to the gameplay. Part of the fun is unlocking them but that's not all the fun. COD is just great to play with friends shooting each other.
Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] It's sad to you that there are people that like a game for gameplay? It's obvious you're just trolling now. I don't have the highest opinion of COD series but I find comments like yours quite childish and unproductive. FelipeInside
How am I trolling? Since when in the hell did perks and unlocks mean the entire gameplay? I find it sad that people rely on unlocks and perks just have fun in a video game. Once upon a time there weren't any perks and unlocks in CoD...

What are you talking about? Persk and Unlocks are just sort of a light RPG element to it, and gives more variety to the gameplay. Part of the fun is unlocking them but that's not all the fun. COD is just great to play with friends shooting each other.

i miss quake 4 :/

Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

Ok I edited the title because it's not as bad as I thought.

It's not worthy of best selling FPS series by a long shot but it's not a terrible game.

BF3 is by far and in every way a better game but BO2 is decent fun as well. The thing is it feels old...really old. Reminds me a quake almost with the crazy fast speed of the game. It's also not a very nice looking game imo. Sure it's got decent textures but the lighting in the game is really dated and the gameplay feels like counter strike or something like that from last gen.

Again these things don't mean it's not fun but it is for sure one of the most overrated games I have ever played imo.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

Ok I edited the title because it's not as bad as I thought.

It's not worthy of best selling FPS series by a long shot but it's not a terrible game.

BF3 is by far and in every way a better game but BO2 is decent fun as well. The thing is it feels old...really old. Reminds me a quake almost with the crazy fast speed of the game. It's also not a very nice looking game imo. Sure it's got decent textures but the lighting in the game is really dated and the gameplay feels like counter strike or something like that from last gen.

Again these things don't mean it's not fun but it is for sure one of the most overrated games I have ever played imo.

BSC14
It's overrated because it sells on consoles a LOT. Poor saps can't get other competitive FPS that run 60fp/s so their choice is limited, and a lot of players are familiarwith with COD2 , COD4 and MW series enough not to bother trying other games and learning curves. It is excellently marketed and it works. You say it's overrated yet it sells more each game. I personally love COD2, and COD4, but many things annoy me about the direction the series took. Yes it can be fun, but it's also stale. But not terrible. I have more gripes with BF3 gameplay than I do with COD. I wish the hit detection was nearly as good as it is in BO2.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
I wish the hit detection was nearly as good as it is in BO2.DevilMightCry
DICE deserves a prize for that, not many well known games manage to sell with such terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay...what am I saying, it's the only well known series (since BC 2 did it too) that offers such trash for actual money, even indie devs with games made in months manage better hit detection.
Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] I wish the hit detection was nearly as good as it is in BO2.DanielDust
DICE deserves a prize for that, not many well known games manage to sell with such terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay...what am I saying, it's the only well known series (since BC 2 did it too) that offers such trash for actual money, even indie devs with games made in months manage better hit detection.

Terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay? What? I'll give that it has some hit detection issues for sure but the overall mechanics and gameplay are so far ahead of any other FPS out there it isn't even funny.

BF3 has a very different feel than COD. It's A LOT more realistic in every way and offers a very different experiance.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
BF 3 isn't a competition to anything, it achieved only one thing, best graphics in an online shooter with decently sized maps, that is not enough to make a game good.
Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

You say it's overrated yet it sells more each game.DevilMightCry

That's my point really. It sells great and it is a fun game but games like BF3 offer SO much more. BO2 does nothing better than BF3 with the exception of hit detection. Other than that it's a simple run-n-gun that's been done over and over. Sure it's done a bit better than most but it's obvious they are putting very little into the game these days. Different perks and crap like that but it's really the same old thing over and over running on the same old crappy engine from the 90s. It looks dated and plays dated...the good thing is that they manage to still make it fun and it runs at about 500fps on a decent pc.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] I wish the hit detection was nearly as good as it is in BO2.BSC14

DICE deserves a prize for that, not many well known games manage to sell with such terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay...what am I saying, it's the only well known series (since BC 2 did it too) that offers such trash for actual money, even indie devs with games made in months manage better hit detection.

Terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay? What? I'll give that it has some hit detection issues for sure but the overall mechanics and gameplay are so far ahead of any other FPS out there it isn't even funny.

BF3 has a very different feel than COD. It's A LOT more realistic in every way and offers a very different experiance.

I have over 200 hours in BF3 and from the terrible hit detection to interactions with object and environments, to lack of VOIP, lack of good game modes... So forth and so on... I agree with Daniel. I can easily say BC2 was a better game, while not being technically better. BF3 is a lifeless, good looking FPS, that has its moments, but lacks the visceral feel of its many weapons and great animations. It. Just. Gets. Boring.
Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

BF 3 isn't a competition to anything, it achieved only one thing, best graphics in an online shooter with decently sized maps, that is not enough to make a game good.DanielDust

I do not agree at all. It's got a more realistic feel than any other shooter out there, best vehicles, destructible environments, best graphics, best art direction, best animations and the best ballance of weapons imo.

BO2 while fun lacks in every one of these areas. It's not a nice looking game, has no vehicles, every weapons feels pretty much the same, has old a$$ animations, no destructible environments...it's just a maze with people blasting eac other. It's quake...but "a little" newer.

Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

[QUOTE="BSC14"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"] DICE deserves a prize for that, not many well known games manage to sell with such terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay...what am I saying, it's the only well known series (since BC 2 did it too) that offers such trash for actual money, even indie devs with games made in months manage better hit detection.DevilMightCry

Terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay? What? I'll give that it has some hit detection issues for sure but the overall mechanics and gameplay are so far ahead of any other FPS out there it isn't even funny.

BF3 has a very different feel than COD. It's A LOT more realistic in every way and offers a very different experiance.

I have over 200 hours in BF3 and from the terrible hit detection to interactions with object and environments, to lack of VOIP, lack of good game modes... So forth and so on... I agree with Daniel. I can easily say BC2 was a better game, while not being technically better. BF3 is a lifeless, good looking FPS, that has its moments, but lacks the visceral feel of its many weapons and great animations. It. Just. Gets. Boring.

I will agree with one thing...getting hung up on a 6" rock or some other stupid thing in the game really pisses me off. That and the hit detection really gets under my skin...the rest of it I do not agree with.

Oh and after 200 hours...you must not have hated it that much :)

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"][QUOTE="BSC14"]

Terrible shooting mechanics and gameplay? What? I'll give that it has some hit detection issues for sure but the overall mechanics and gameplay are so far ahead of any other FPS out there it isn't even funny.

BF3 has a very different feel than COD. It's A LOT more realistic in every way and offers a very different experiance.

BSC14

I have over 200 hours in BF3 and from the terrible hit detection to interactions with object and environments, to lack of VOIP, lack of good game modes... So forth and so on... I agree with Daniel. I can easily say BC2 was a better game, while not being technically better. BF3 is a lifeless, good looking FPS, that has its moments, but lacks the visceral feel of its many weapons and great animations. It. Just. Gets. Boring.

I will agree with one thing...getting hung up on a 6" rock or some other stupid thing in the game really pisses me off. That and the hit detection really gets under my skin...the rest of it I do not agree with.

Oh and after 200 hours...you must not have hated it that much :)

I don't hate it. BO2 isn't even in the same league. That's like comparing CS to Planetside 2. Both quite different. The foundation in BF3 is great, but the execution of the details bugs me quite a lot. You say the weapons are balanced? They're not. They just made them all quite similar to please the whiners. DICE is just narrowing the gap between good and bad players. That's not balanced, that's appeasing to the masses. If you suck... Maybe BF3 isn't for you. Instead people whine about every damn thing, weapon, and vehicle... and then Dice patches it up. To me, other than the AN94, every ar is so similar... I don't even bother with them. Look, I am not going through a list of things like the ones you mentioned, just to make my point. It's a decent game, and PC does have a drought of BF3 like games, and too many COD's of this world, and that makes it even harder. I just hoped BF3 would do a lot of things right, and to me, it didn't. I still have that void.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Although they are both shooters, it's hard to compare BF3 to COD, they play completely differently.