Black Ops for PC....is it worse then consoles ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kyle_360
kyle_360

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kyle_360
Member since 2009 • 530 Posts

i was just wondering if the pc version was just as good as the console version, and if there were any differences that you could tell me so i can deside which version to choose from

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Both are pretyy bad IMO, but as a PC gamer i would say pass on that version

Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

It's better I think.

Dedicated server with free multiplayer, M&KB and better graphics.

Only cons is there's no party system on PC.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

It's better I think.

Dedicated server with free multiplayer, M&KB and better graphics.

Only cons is there's no party system on PC.

the_mitch28
What about the fact that it runs like crap for a lot of people?
Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

[QUOTE="the_mitch28"]

It's better I think.

Dedicated server with free multiplayer, M&KB and better graphics.

Only cons is there's no party system on PC.

SF_KiLLaMaN

What about the fact that it runs like crap for a lot of people?

Thought they fixed that a while ago?

Anyways when people ask for a comparison I just compare the PC version working on a machine that handles it fine. There will always be computers that can't run games... no point mentioning it every time.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

Game still runs like crap, especially for a game that looks no better then World at War. Also they added some kind of garbage mouse acceleration or mouse smoothing... It's like you have no raw mouse input. Feels very sluggish. As far as multiplayer goes its more like a cut down version of World at War.

Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts
It runs perfectly on my setup now after the updates, however the online system is not very good IMO. The dedicated servers make CoD garbage because every server has it's own rules and setup going. What I like to play the most in CoD is team deathmatch, 12 players on all the levels. 1% of servers offer this. It's rare that I get in a game I enjoy on Black Ops. The console system is much, much better if you prefer standardized rules and gameplay types.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Its terrible

The only good version of Black Ops is the the 360 version. The PS3 and PC version are pretty bad...

Avatar image for kyle_360
kyle_360

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kyle_360
Member since 2009 • 530 Posts

Its terrible

The only good version of Black Ops is the the 360 version. The PS3 and PC version are pretty bad...

JangoWuzHere
reasons why???
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts

I still have performance issues... I'll be getting 100+ fps and then it will drop to 30, no matter what my settings are. I just went back to MW2. The only thing I miss is playing hardcore with pistols as my main weapon in Blops. And they have some cool SMG's as well. Didn't care much for any other part of the game...

Avatar image for Godofnerdyness
Godofnerdyness

3248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Godofnerdyness
Member since 2007 • 3248 Posts

Try the free weekend and see if it runs okay on your PC. It's almost random whether or not it'll run fine, but luckily, it runs smooth as butter for me.

Anyways, I haven't played it on console, but I don't really have any problems with PC. I always hear people complaining about hit detection on the 360, which has never been an issue for me. And thanks to dedicated servers I never run into any horrible lag, which is also a major complaint from console players.

All I can suggest is to try the free weekend and see for yourself.

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#12 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

Try the free weekend and see if it runs okay on your PC. It's almost random whether or not it'll run fine, but luckily, it runs smooth as butter for me.

Godofnerdyness

I have the PS3 version because I was told the PC version was terrible and in my experience that was true. Granted, I didn't like the PS3 version either...

I tried a free weekend and honestly it ran like utter crap. I don't have any problems with any games but Black Ops just completely junked out on me. Multiplayer freezing, couldnt set the screen res past 640x256 or something insane like that from the options menu without the game crashing.

Worst thing ever. And I don't even understand why.

Please just don't buy it... if you want CoD wait for MW3 or something... really...

Avatar image for scoots9
scoots9

3505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#13 scoots9
Member since 2006 • 3505 Posts

I've played the 360 and PC versions. The PC version just felt... off. Maybe it's just because I'm used to Call of Duty 4 for PC. Of course the 360 version had terrible controls also, but that's expected of a console FPS.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

just played the free weekend for an hour for the lulz...yea its bad. I mean, the system in my sig had hiccups in the game, and just that aside, the gameplay itself is so stale

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

The PC version is a decent port. The only time it ran horrible was the week the game came out. After the patches the games run perfect. Looks way better than the console version, better controls, it has dedicated servers. And also has mod support. But if you dont have COD4 get that game, its a better game.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts
The game still runs like ****. Bad stuttering, massive frame-rate dips. And the game, itself, is terrible.
Avatar image for kyle_360
kyle_360

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kyle_360
Member since 2009 • 530 Posts
k guys after playing it for free off steam i chose to buy it, and it runs smoothly no problems
Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#18 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

its not the best game to begin with...but my exp on the pc version on hardcore...everyone uses silencers and camps...or its a grenade syntax fest...people try to troll me sayin i have a bad kdr...but dying 5 or 6 times in a row on spawn to a grenade...not fun...and does wonders for kdr...

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

its not the best game to begin with...but my exp on the pc version on hardcore...everyone uses silencers and camps...or its a grenade syntax fest...people try to troll me sayin i have a bad kdr...but dying 5 or 6 times in a row on spawn to a grenade...not fun...and does wonders for kdr...

lpjazzman220
Why do you care about KDR? >_>
Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

[QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

its not the best game to begin with...but my exp on the pc version on hardcore...everyone uses silencers and camps...or its a grenade syntax fest...people try to troll me sayin i have a bad kdr...but dying 5 or 6 times in a row on spawn to a grenade...not fun...and does wonders for kdr...

C_Rule

Why do you care about KDR? >_>

i dont other than thats the only metric people tend to think of for measuring skill...i dont really care about kdr...but dying on spawn cause of grenade spam sucks...i really dont care about camping that much...after awhile u learn where to look lolz...camping really hinders the campers skills...but i cant tell u how many games of blops ive played where its pretty much spawn..boom...spawn...boom...spawn...boom...spawn 2 steps...boom...rinse and repeat...it just removes all of the fun for me...i mean seriously how can it be fun if u cant actually play the game on most servers...

Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

Pass on COD:BO. The online is a horribly laggy mess for both console and pc verions. The pc version (for me at least) does not run well despit having a more than capable rig and reducing settings. The campaign is actually pretty fun, but I wouldn't pay as much as its priced now. The online servers a lot of my favorite ones started using the new map packs which I do not want to buy.

I would however suggest buying COD:BO for ps3/360 if you live in college dorms, and have other zombie lovers. The game mode is isanely addictive, and regardless of what you think about COD they did this mode right.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts
k guys after playing it for free off steam i chose to buy it, and it runs smoothly no problemskyle_360
Hope it didn't cost much. It gets boring, very quickly.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
k guys after playing it for free off steam i chose to buy it, and it runs smoothly no problemskyle_360
Enjoy ;), people that say it runs bad have no idea what they're talking about, even if it's Activision support gets funded after the first week of release (when there really were these problems). One thing's for sure, it's better than MW 2 at everything, they still didn't fix the micro stutter on that one.
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Yeah, its best on PC. I bought it but I have not played it too much, it is a very good game though.

Avatar image for Code135
Code135

892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Code135
Member since 2005 • 892 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="the_mitch28"]

It's better I think.

Dedicated server with free multiplayer, M&KB and better graphics.

Only cons is there's no party system on PC.

the_mitch28

What about the fact that it runs like crap for a lot of people?

Thought they fixed that a while ago?

There will always be computers that can't run games... no point mentioning it every time.

There will always be computers that can't run games ... even though they can cover the max settings of those games ...

And that was the story of me and BO that began last year since day one pre-order and ended last week ...

Avatar image for true_gamer007
true_gamer007

433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#27 true_gamer007
Member since 2011 • 433 Posts

PCs are always ahead of consoles for FPSs and RPGs.

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

i was just wondering if the pc version was just as good as the console version, and if there were any differences that you could tell me so i can deside which version to choose from

kyle_360

consoles - 1024x600, 2xAA, 0xAF, medium settings, 50-60fps, smaller FOV, no dedicate server, controller

PC - 1920x1200, 8xAA, 16xAF, high settings, 120-150fps, large FOV, dedicate server, k/m

as you can see pc version is way better.

Avatar image for alan_carter
alan_carter

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 alan_carter
Member since 2009 • 1404 Posts

i was just wondering if the pc version was just as good as the console version, and if there were any differences that you could tell me so i can deside which version to choose from

kyle_360

My advice will be not to buy it.. pretty bad game, i dislike cods, and this is one of the worsts. On pc should look sharper cos higher res.. blah blah blah but it'll run all way laggy, both in performance n server..

I think that u can play it free this weekend on steam.

If u must get it cos some m8 gettin it too, get it on console, runs better and it's meant for console.

Hope that helps

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="kyle_360"]

i was just wondering if the pc version was just as good as the console version, and if there were any differences that you could tell me so i can deside which version to choose from

alan_carter

My advice will be not to buy it.. pretty bad game, i dislike cods, and this is one of the worsts. On pc should look sharper cos higher res.. blah blah blah but it'll run all way laggy, both in performance n server..

I think that u can play it free this weekend on steam.

If u must get it cos some m8 gettin it too, get it on console, runs better and it's meant for console.

Hope that helps

not sure if serious. how it dose run better on console when on pc you get double the fps and less ping(because of dedicate servers), and how it is meant for consoles when every fps game is meant for PC?

Avatar image for alan_carter
alan_carter

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 alan_carter
Member since 2009 • 1404 Posts

[QUOTE="alan_carter"]

[QUOTE="kyle_360"]

i was just wondering if the pc version was just as good as the console version, and if there were any differences that you could tell me so i can deside which version to choose from

MK-Professor

My advice will be not to buy it.. pretty bad game, i dislike cods, and this is one of the worsts. On pc should look sharper cos higher res.. blah blah blah but it'll run all way laggy, both in performance n server..

I think that u can play it free this weekend on steam.

If u must get it cos some m8 gettin it too, get it on console, runs better and it's meant for console.

Hope that helps

not sure if serious. how it dose run better on console when on pc you get double the fps and less ping(because of dedicate servers), and how it is meant for consoles when every fps game is meant for PC?

u ppl here are quite stubborn. "every fps game is meant to pc" now, is that serious? specially referrin to cod And in my experience, i've attempted to run the game, first, on a Q9550 @3.6 8gb ddr3 1333 n gtx 470 and it was between 40-70 fps, with huge drops, also attempted runnin it on an amd x4 955BE 3.4ghz with 1600mhz ddr3 n ati 4890 n it ran about the same.. About the dedicated servers, my opinion doesnt rly count as my old dsl is pretty slow, but i know ppl with fast optic fiber connection who hav problems with it..
Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="alan_carter"]

My advice will be not to buy it.. pretty bad game, i dislike cods, and this is one of the worsts. On pc should look sharper cos higher res.. blah blah blah but it'll run all way laggy, both in performance n server..

I think that u can play it free this weekend on steam.

If u must get it cos some m8 gettin it too, get it on console, runs better and it's meant for console.

Hope that helps

alan_carter

not sure if serious. how it dose run better on console when on pc you get double the fps and less ping(because of dedicate servers), and how it is meant for consoles when every fps game is meant for PC?

u ppl here are quite stubborn. "every fps game is meant to pc" now, is that serious? specially referrin to cod And in my experience, i've attempted to run the game, first, on a Q9550 @3.6 8gb ddr3 1333 n gtx 470 and it was between 40-70 fps, with huge drops, also attempted runnin it on an amd x4 955BE 3.4ghz with 1600mhz ddr3 n ati 4890 n it ran about the same.. About the dedicated servers, my opinion doesnt rly count as my old dsl is pretty slow, but i know ppl with fast optic fiber connection who hav problems with it..

"every fps game is meant to pc" this statement is serious because it is true. playing fps-games with k/m, high fps, large FOV, dedicate server is allways better than playing with controller,low fps, small FOV, no dedicate server.

Also i finding very hard to believe that in your system cod run like that because in my system ( i7 4.1GHz, 6GB, GTX480 OC) run like that 1920x1200, 8xAA, 16xAF, high settings, 120-150fps, large FOV.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="alan_carter"]

My advice will be not to buy it.. pretty bad game, i dislike cods, and this is one of the worsts. On pc should look sharper cos higher res.. blah blah blah but it'll run all way laggy, both in performance n server..

I think that u can play it free this weekend on steam.

If u must get it cos some m8 gettin it too, get it on console, runs better and it's meant for console.

Hope that helps

alan_carter

not sure if serious. how it dose run better on console when on pc you get double the fps and less ping(because of dedicate servers), and how it is meant for consoles when every fps game is meant for PC?

u ppl here are quite stubborn. "every fps game is meant to pc" now, is that serious? specially referrin to cod

Yes, there's not a single FPS that would be a better choice on consoles.
Avatar image for alan_carter
alan_carter

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 alan_carter
Member since 2009 • 1404 Posts

[QUOTE="alan_carter"][QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

not sure if serious. how it dose run better on console when on pc you get double the fps and less ping(because of dedicate servers), and how it is meant for consoles when every fps game is meant for PC?

MK-Professor

u ppl here are quite stubborn. "every fps game is meant to pc" now, is that serious? specially referrin to cod And in my experience, i've attempted to run the game, first, on a Q9550 @3.6 8gb ddr3 1333 n gtx 470 and it was between 40-70 fps, with huge drops, also attempted runnin it on an amd x4 955BE 3.4ghz with 1600mhz ddr3 n ati 4890 n it ran about the same.. About the dedicated servers, my opinion doesnt rly count as my old dsl is pretty slow, but i know ppl with fast optic fiber connection who hav problems with it..

"every fps game is meant to pc" this statement is serious because it is true. playing fps-games with k/m, high fps, large FOV, dedicate server is allways better than playing with controller,low fps, small FOV, no dedicate server.

Also i finding very hard to believe that in your system cod run like that because in my system ( i7 4.1GHz, 6GB, GTX480 OC) run like that 1920x1200, 8xAA, 16xAF, high settings, 120-150fps, large FOV.

Yeah bud, we all love playing high fps and with sharp graphics.

Tbh, i got a ps3 few years ago, and i've merely used it cos it's a joke to play there, not just lower resolution, ehm,., i hate playin fps with controller and evrything looks blurry, slow and jagged.

But those simple games like cod, are great for mainstream console gamers who aren't looking for any complex thing. They're stunned with cod effects and weird weapons... so yeah, pc gamers, are number 2 here.. just remember how long it took for them to release BO dlcs for pc? months later..

Btw, ur pc is quite alot faster than my systems. I also know one guy, with an old dual core and a hd4850 who runs the game better than me.. so there should be some trouble between my pc n bo lol

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#35 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

The game still runs like ****. Bad stuttering, massive frame-rate dips. And the game, itself, is terrible.C_Rule

This, I can max out BC2 with 8x AA at 1080p, and I do get better performance with it, than I do on COD:BO (and I played it with things turned down and off, shadows were completely off, and performed much worse than a better looking, and much larger game)

And the game still plays like crap. (saying it only had performance issues during the launch week is just naive) Even months after it came out it still was under performing.

Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

The game still runs like crap for me, regardless of what graphics settings I use.

Avatar image for morrowindnic
morrowindnic

1541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 morrowindnic
Member since 2004 • 1541 Posts

The game is horrible.

It runs like crap. How can such a bad looking game, run so badly?

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

PC version is still bugged for dual core users.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
I think its better ont he console simply due to the online splitscreen you can play with a friend next to you in both zombies and regular multiplayer.
Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="alan_carter"] u ppl here are quite stubborn. "every fps game is meant to pc" now, is that serious? specially referrin to cod And in my experience, i've attempted to run the game, first, on a Q9550 @3.6 8gb ddr3 1333 n gtx 470 and it was between 40-70 fps, with huge drops, also attempted runnin it on an amd x4 955BE 3.4ghz with 1600mhz ddr3 n ati 4890 n it ran about the same.. About the dedicated servers, my opinion doesnt rly count as my old dsl is pretty slow, but i know ppl with fast optic fiber connection who hav problems with it..alan_carter

"every fps game is meant to pc" this statement is serious because it is true. playing fps-games with k/m, high fps, large FOV, dedicate server is allways better than playing with controller,low fps, small FOV, no dedicate server.

Also i finding very hard to believe that in your system cod run like that because in my system ( i7 4.1GHz, 6GB, GTX480 OC) run like that 1920x1200, 8xAA, 16xAF, high settings, 120-150fps, large FOV.

Yeah bud, we all love playing high fps and with sharp graphics.

Tbh, i got a ps3 few years ago, and i've merely used it cos it's a joke to play there, not just lower resolution, ehm,., i hate playin fps with controller and evrything looks blurry, slow and jagged.

But those simple games like cod, are great for mainstream console gamers who aren't looking for any complex thing. They're stunned with cod effects and weird weapons... so yeah, pc gamers, are number 2 here.. just remember how long it took for them to release BO dlcs for pc? months later..

Btw, ur pc is quite alot faster than my systems. I also know one guy, with an old dual core and a hd4850 who runs the game better than me.. so there should be some trouble between my pc n bo lol

Doesn't matter if the game is simple or not. the pc version is the superior version for the reasons that I stated earlier. Btw my system (i7 4.1GHz & GTX480OC) is not anywhere near as fast to get 3 times more fps than your system (Q9550 3.6GHz & GTX470), so their is a serious problem from your side (don't know what it is, Internet lag or hardware problem or whatever)

also the thing with the dlcs means nothing because microsoft pays money to delay the release of dlcs for the pc and ps3.

Avatar image for timma25
timma25

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 timma25
Member since 2005 • 1131 Posts

No no no no no. I've had the game since release and its absolutely awful. I played it recently on the ps3 and was amazed that it could be played that well. I live in Canada and 90% of the servers under 100 ping play one map (nuketown). Its impossible to find a decent server in anything other then deathmatch and you cannot play with your friends most of the time; if you do get in to a game with them you cannot change teams should you be stuck on opposite sides. The performance issues are random, some machines cannot run the game at all (despite having killer specs) and other computers run it fine. I've played all the cods on my pc and this is the only one that cannot consistently run 40fps+.

TLDR: The consoles have more players, have people playing different game modes, allow you to play with your friends and have a consistent frame rate. If graphics are the only thing that matter to you then go for it and pray that it can at least run on your computer.

Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#42 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

It is the worst Call of Duty since Call of Duty 3. I would pass if I were you and stick with the others.

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts

CoD 2, MW1, MW2 are currently the only CoD games worth even touching on PC. I know for a fact MW2 can run on practically any rig on max at 60+ FPS, although somehow it seems MW2 actually gets better framerates than MW1. Also, if you live in an area where p2p matchmaking gives you issues, use AlterIWnet since it's a client that lets you play on dedicated servers, which Activision unfortunately did not include with the vanilla version of MW2 on PC. Also, do check out the spec ops co-op, it's the best co-op in the entire CoD series, and I'm pretty sure MW3's version will be terrible compared to this. If there's one thing CoD you play, it should be the spec ops mode in MW2, forget the campaigns.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

The game is one of the most horribly optmized games I have played.

It made GTA 4 seem well optimized.

Black Ops is probably up there with Saints Row although atleast Saints Row would run fine if you turned off some of the settings.

Black Ops would run like crap even on low settings even after all those 5-6+ patches.