Building a PC for 3ds Max

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mon_bus
mon_bus

147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 mon_bus
Member since 2007 • 147 Posts

Hello everyone

I am trying to build a PC for a friend who uses 3ds Max and Autocad to draw plans and designs for homes (he owns a business). Now his designs are pretty detailed, but I am not familiar with neither autocad nor 3ds Max so I am not sure what sort of hardware to get him. Here is the list I have at the moment, but I am scared I might be going overboard as I am unsure how demanding 3ds Max really is.

Dual Core @ 3.0 GHz

4GB RAM

P35-DS4 Mobo

8600 GT

500 Watt PSU

500 GB HD (SATA)

Generic Case/Heatsink.

He will be running Windows XP Pro.

Any ideas?

Avatar image for zyndex171
zyndex171

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 zyndex171
Member since 2006 • 102 Posts
3ds Max need high end pc to double up process rendering the animation and big size of megabytes just to create a simple animation. I guess your pc r capable.
Avatar image for iangrima
iangrima

249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 iangrima
Member since 2006 • 249 Posts
i would suggest Getting a Quad core like a Q6600 autocad and 3ds max would make great use of it perhaps a better gfx card... an 8800GT, it uses CUDA technology (helps with rendering and such). A list of cuda enabled gpu's http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_learn_products.html
Avatar image for Bane_v2
Bane_v2

6104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Bane_v2
Member since 2003 • 6104 Posts
Get a workstation card, not a desktop card.
Avatar image for mon_bus
mon_bus

147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 mon_bus
Member since 2007 • 147 Posts

Get a workstation card, not a desktop card.Bane_v2

Sorry to trouble you, but any specefic suggestions?

Avatar image for Larrymon2000
Larrymon2000

2969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Larrymon2000
Member since 2003 • 2969 Posts
I'd get a Q6600 for the CPU, and as for the graphics card, all I know is quadro or firegl.
Avatar image for mon_bus
mon_bus

147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 mon_bus
Member since 2007 • 147 Posts
Alright, guess im going for the Q6600. However, these workstation cards seem pretty expensive. How do they differ from the desktop cards like the 8800gt?
Avatar image for sadikovic
sadikovic

3868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 sadikovic
Member since 2004 • 3868 Posts
Workstation cards are expensive and I would only recommend one low bugdet Quadro and its the FX 1700, I would go with 4GB of ram and a Q6600 or better CPU though.
Avatar image for Angry_Bosmer
Angry_Bosmer

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Angry_Bosmer
Member since 2008 • 1432 Posts

Get a workstation card, not a desktop card.Bane_v2

Agree, a fireGL or a Quadro would be better.

Avatar image for Angry_Bosmer
Angry_Bosmer

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Angry_Bosmer
Member since 2008 • 1432 Posts

Workstation cards are expensive and I would only recommend one low bugdet Quadro and its the FX 1700, I would go with 4GB of ram and a Q6600 or better CPU though.sadikovic

Yes but they are infinitely more precise and that's what a architect needs.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

I'd get a Q6600 for the CPU, and as for the graphics card, all I know is quadro or firegl.Larrymon2000

that's a buget cpu for 3d rendering, go way up unless you wana wait ages

Alright, guess im going for the Q6600. However, these workstation cards seem pretty expensive. How do they differ from the desktop cards like the 8800gt?mon_bus

well if your on a buget then the q6600 is a great cpu but you might like to look into the q9xx series

Avatar image for DGFreak
DGFreak

2234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 DGFreak
Member since 2003 • 2234 Posts
I have a FireGL v5200 in my mobile workstation and even that takes a pretty good amount of time to render even simple parts and assemblies. Be prepared to spend upwards of $600 on the video card.
Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
For those kinds of tasks, you might want to go with two quad-cores in an Intel Skulltrail board, or possibly take the Mac Pro route. 3D rendering and CAD should be able to take advantage of multiple CPUs/cores to great effect. (However, such a setup is by no means cheap; if your budget prohibits this sort of thing, you'll probably want to step down to a single quad-core.) As for workstation cards (Quadro or FireGL), I'm not too up-to-scratch on them, but what I do know is that they're optimized for these sort of tasks. They're quite expensive compared to gaming cards, though (and even perform worse in games, though that's irrelevant for this build).