Building a PC in the next month or so, need some advice.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

Ok... going to be building a decent machine in the next few weeks. I know what im doing as far as building pc's, its just i have been out of the loop on current tech for awhile. Im Looking to spend around 1500 bucks, can go over a tad but would like to stay in that area. Dont need a monitor as i have a decent one but i do need windows vista.

What i had in mind thus far.....

GPU.... I want to go high end here, was looking into the 4870 x2 but honestly im not sure as it may leave me lacking in other areas. Im used to nvidia so i might be better off with a single gtx280... Im not resolution freak.

Mobo... No idea here, i know crap about gaming mobos.

CPU.... Was looking at this one... Not really sure here either. Is quad core being used alot in current games? Also hows AMD's Processors compared to intle right now? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017

Cpu fan.... Agian depend what i choose.... I dont overclock for the most part but i dont like stock fans...

Ram will depend on the mobo...

Case, was looking into the Antec 900 as i have heard alot of good things about it.

PSU... this is what i had in mind. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139006

Hard drives, Disc drives etc... Dont matter much... I figure i will get a 500gig for storage and a smaller drive for windows. Not a major issue just keep that in mind for cost.

Also as i dont plan to make this order untill the end of september or early october is there anything coming out that should affect my decision?I want this system to be future proof for a few years anyways, i realize its impossiple to make a system to run anything at high for the next 2 years or so but i do want somthing that i can go to the store grab a game and not have to worry if i can play it half decent.

I dont need nothing fancy for overclocking as im not really into that... Once i build a system i really dont mess with it other then formats and upgrades.

Thanks for any help!

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
Another thing i should mention, I monitor i use is also my tv... As said im not a crazy freak when it comes to resolution. I want to run most things at 1280x768.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#3 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

If you want to go high-end,

GPU - I would go with HD4870x2. If you MUST have Nvidia, then get the GTX280. But the HD4870x2 is the most powerful card out now.

PSU - Corsair HX 1000w. You dont want to mess with a TX750w. Not only are the cables really messy (understatement), but you'll want 1000w if you're packing a high-end GPU and build. You'll be set for a long time too. If you plan to run multiple GPUs in the future, you'll need a minimum of 1000w or sometimes even 1200w.

CPU - A dual-core will give you more clock speed and overclock ability for gaming. Quad-Cores are not utilize in gaming yet. If you're one of those people that like to open 6 web pages at once, while running iTunes, and downloading 3 items at a time, I would get a Quad-Core, NO QUESTION. If you have a bit more patience, I would go with Dual-Core as it's cheaper and is solely better for gaming right now.

CPU heatsink/fan: If you're not going to overclock at all, you dont need an aftermarket cooler unless you like the coolness factor and the looks, OR you have money to blow. I would recommend a Tuniq Tower, Thermalright 120, Arctic Freezer Pro 7, or Noctua. There isnt one that's significantly more dominant than the other, if you dont plan to overclock too much.

Case: If you can, avoid Antec 900 and get something you like. Get a case that you'd like to look at everyday. It's time for personalization.

RAM and Mobo - I would stick with DDR2. In gaming, performance is on par. With Nehalem around the corner, there's really no point to blow your money on a DDR3 motherboard because you'll just have to replace later anyways. Nehalem uses a different socket. You'll be able to reuse the DDR3 ram but that's about it. So whether you get DDR2 or DDR3, performance wise, it's pretty much the same, except with DDR3, you'll be paying a lot more.

Avatar image for Larrymon2000
Larrymon2000

2969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 Larrymon2000
Member since 2003 • 2969 Posts
E8400 is the way to go for dual-core CPU... I'd get that.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

Heres what i came up with guys....

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=10599808

Few questions... should i go with the 64 bit windows? Do i need a sound card or am i fine with the on-board? I usually just use head phones... Also, dose it matter that the board is normal pci express x16 and not 2.0? Im fairly sure its backward compatable and dont matter much but im asking anyways.

Thanks!

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=10600048

New List ^ Meets my budget and all.... I wnet with home for vista to cut cost as i guess i really dont need ultimate. Go with the 64 bit since i went with 4 gigs of ram? I thing on 32 only 3 gigs show up.... Also i realize the mobo only has one pci express slot but i dont see myself going to a crossfire setup. The power supply is the one you suggested.

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
Get an E8500 as the processor and get an Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme as the heatsink. For the GPU, I'd suggest a GX2. You could SLI the GX2s for the same price as a single X2. With that you'd need a 790i motherboard. Or if you're just going to stick with a single GPU, go with the Asus Rampge Formula as the motherboard.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
Wow... im so confused.... 2 very different opinions.... Im leaning more for the 4780 x2 tho with my first setup... I think i might pass on the power supply you suggest as im having trouble justifiying its price when i dont see me getting another 4780x2.
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
I fell for the hype of the 4870 X2 and it's supposed to arrive here tomorrow. The thing gets outperformed by the GX2 and GTX280 by large margins in several games, namely Crysis. For twice the price of a GX2, it only does better than it half the time, while the other half the GX2 does better or just as well. There's also apparently a lot of issues with the 4870 X2.
Avatar image for vipiespot
vipiespot

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 vipiespot
Member since 2007 • 71 Posts

a quad core would be more future proof than a dual core IMO

once games start supporting it, performance will probably increase

the best way to go, its expensive, but if you can get a quad core that runs @ or over 3 GHZ that would be the most powerful route to go because in the long run youre getting 12GHz compared to 6GHz from a dual core...

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
Yes... i hear they run hot and the fact that they have the same faults as a normal dual card setup is a let down.... I have also always perfered nvidia chips as i have better luck with the drivers but im still not sure what to do... Is there a good benchmark up for the 280 vs the 4780 x2? Not the gamespot one.... want more then just 3 games and 3dmark.
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
Oh please, quad cores won't be taken advantage of for years. No point in getting a quad core now for future proofing, since it'll be so behind what multple core processors can do in the future when they're actually being coded for natively. And having multiple cores doesn't multiply their clock speed. All the cores run at the same speed and doesn't scale like that. If only one core is being used, it's not running at 12Ghz. For benchmarks, try Anandtech, Firingsquad and Tom's Hardware.
Avatar image for vipiespot
vipiespot

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 vipiespot
Member since 2007 • 71 Posts

yeah you may be right as far as that goes with the future and native coding...

but as far as the scaling goes.. i like to think of it more as spreading the workload.. i do agree with you though, as far as now goes, there just arent enough programs that support threading the cores..

i guess for budget sake, get a dual core now, and then later if something starts supporting multicore processing, not only will the chips be cheaper, but probably better

btw, would you say 3+ cores are more aimed at office productivity? and the dual cores may not be aimed at, but are more fit for gaming?

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

^ Not to mention theres no way i can fit a 500 dollar + cpu into this build..... I said 1500 bucks not 2500 ( =

When quad cors become cheap is when they will be used.... No game developer is going to make it criticle to have a quad core cpu for many yeayrs and by then they will be the 200 dollar cpu's. Im trying to future proof this as much as i can but i also gotta be realistic.

Im going to go with a e8500... my only issue now is do i go with the 4780 x2 or the slightly cheaper but slower gtx280...

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
Sure, multiple cores spread the workload when the program in question has been coded to do so. But as it stands now, the cores handle different programs indepedently, rather than all being utilized at once. Processors aren't particularly aimed at anything othe than price points. As for the GTX280 vs 4870 X2, go to Anandtech, Firingsquad and Tom's Hardware to see their comparisons. They both do better with different games. I'd say go with the GTX280, or the GX2, save the money and see what comes out in the near future.
Avatar image for vipiespot
vipiespot

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 vipiespot
Member since 2007 • 71 Posts

well

i compared them on GPUreview.com and im going to go with the 280, for price sake

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

my current list.... With shipping and after rebates its 1520 bucks.... Just want someone to make sure its all compatable.... Im leaning more for the gtx280 as i really dont like the current limitations multi-gpu setups have and how hit and miss the support is.

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=10600548

That power supply has more then ennough juice right? I just couldent do the 300$ psu mentioned earlier. I always have had good faith in evga so thats where i stuck my cash... Any other suggestions?

Oh and is the 64 bit windos vista ok? Hows driver support for that now? I heard alot of bad things before but i dont think i can run 4 gigs on a 32 bit os... Any advice there?

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
64bit OS is fine. I use Vista 64 Ultimate and I've never run into a driver problem. As for the power supply, go with the PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Quad. Fantastic power supply. Single rail, non-modular. And cheaper. But that one is good too.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
Thanks for that suggestion! Gonna go with that.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Dont recommend 9800GX2.. come on now.. it's a microstuttering GPU. You should know better. It's been discontinued already because that card is a joke.
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
The 4870 X2 suffers from the same problem.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

Dont recommend 9800GX2.. come on now.. it's a microstuttering GPU. You should know better. It's been discontinued already because that card is a joke. Elann2008

No i woulden't go with that... But im leaning more for the gtx 280 now... I realize i could get more performance out of the 4780 x2 but at my res 1280x768 will it make a huge difference? Heres my build as it stands now...

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=10600828

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
No. The 4870 X2 will not give any appreciable advantage at that resolution. But as I said before, the two cards perform better with different engines.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
So i think i will go with what i have then... Just one other question tho.... The board im going with is not pci express 2.0... i know that a pci e card thats set for 2.0 runs in a 1.1 slot but how larg of a performance gap will it make? From what i understand it wont make any difference with most current cards as none use that much bandwidth yet, but is this somthing i need to worry about or not?
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
What motherboard are you going with?
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813188026
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
That motherboard should be okay, I suppose. Do you care about overclocking?
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

That motherboard should be okay, I suppose. Do you care about overclocking?Thompsonwhore

No, i tend to just run it all stock clockings.

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
Well, I see you're coosing to go with an E8400. I'd go with an E8500, get a better motherboard, a Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme heatsink and overcock it. You'll get huge performance gains.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

No, i switched to the e8500, heres my current setup...

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=10600828
Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
You linked your private wishlist. Regardless, my point still stands. E8500, better motheboard, TRUE. If you don't want to bother with any of that, I suppose the motherboard you suggested earlier would be fine.
Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts
Fixed the list, any reccomendations on a better board?
Avatar image for vipiespot
vipiespot

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 vipiespot
Member since 2007 • 71 Posts

the only vista64 compatibility issue ive come across so far was with NERO... nero doesnt work at all with vista64

but that doesnt make much of a difference anyway.. nero is bloated and i dont like it anyway... lol

Avatar image for dudy80
dudy80

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 dudy80
Member since 2004 • 1787 Posts

How about this board?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813188024

Im going to sleep guys... thanks for the help... will work on this a bit tomorrow .

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts
That board looks fine to me. Do you intend to SLI another card? If you want a great overclocking board, get the Rampage Formula.