Call of Duty 4 Graphics

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hellenic1234
Hellenic1234

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Hellenic1234
Member since 2006 • 201 Posts

Should Anisotropic filtering for Call of Duty 4be on maximum for best visuals? What other pointers can you give so i can max out my Graphics.

Thanks for the help.;)

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#2 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

yes AF will make textures in the distance sharper.

Another thing that helps cod 4 look better is

r_lodbiasrigid -1000

r_lodbiasskinned -1000

basically this makes things like models have no pop in at all. Most noticable on cars, just move back from one in default and you see it loses detail at a certain distance, with those commands full detail any distance, can hurt fps obviously.

Avatar image for Ark-Angel-04
Ark-Angel-04

324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Ark-Angel-04
Member since 2005 • 324 Posts
the graphics in this game are crap
Avatar image for DGFreak
DGFreak

2234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DGFreak
Member since 2003 • 2234 Posts

the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04

Hahahhahahahahha.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#5 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts

[QUOTE="Ark-Angel-04"]the graphics in this game are crap DGFreak

Hahahhahahahahha.

Maybe try the game before making comments like that.. although im sure you know the graphics are great, your just trolling.

I've only played the COD4 demo, i look foreward to getting the full game and playing through it.

Avatar image for zeus_gb
zeus_gb

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#6 zeus_gb
Member since 2004 • 7793 Posts
the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04
ROFL! They might be on your 360 but on the PC they are really good.
Avatar image for UTXII
UTXII

3448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 UTXII
Member since 2007 • 3448 Posts

AF really helped my game look better.

If you have the power, go for it.

As for people saying the graphics suck, I agree; they may look bad on the 360, but on PC it's unbelievable. Some of the vistas are simply breathtaking.

Avatar image for dayaccus007
dayaccus007

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dayaccus007
Member since 2007 • 4349 Posts

the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04

I bet you never played the game

Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#10 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts

the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04

opinions given by graphics whores are a waste of bandwidth

Avatar image for Reesicup
Reesicup

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Reesicup
Member since 2003 • 77 Posts
the graphics are okay, i love the game, love call of duty series actually... but the graphics are okay, they only enhanced the cod2 engine by alot... which was a good idea because they already had a good engine which could handle big environs and TONS of enemies, but i wanted something new. so meh.
Avatar image for Vamenti
Vamenti

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Vamenti
Member since 2007 • 151 Posts

I have never seen leaves blow off trees before and the game has such a realistic feel to it. All the missions have been layed out perfectly. The assassination mission with the S.A.S snipers is **** awesome. I was **** freakin out hoping I wouldn't be seen the enemy was literally right next to me. In conclusion its the best FPS I have ever played with the best realistic textures and graphics to date, There is no doubts. I could go on for hours but you have to play the game for yourself to really understand what I am ravin on about.

If your too scared to join the S.A.S or the U.S.M.C just buy a copy of COD4 its just about the real deal the only difference is you can die more then once.

Avatar image for omerdv
omerdv

1071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 omerdv
Member since 2005 • 1071 Posts

I have never seen leaves blow off trees before and the game has such a realistic feel to it. All the missions have been layed out perfectly. The assassination mission with the S.A.S snipers is **** awesome. I was **** freakin out hoping I wouldn't be seen the enemy was literally right next to me. In conclusion its the best FPS I have ever played with the best realistic textures and graphics to date, There is no doubts. I could go on for hours but you have to play the game for yourself to really understand what I am ravin on about.

If your too scared to join the S.A.S or the U.S.M.C just buy a copy of COD4 its just about the real deal the only difference is you can die more then once.

Vamenti

COD4 is very good, but Crysis has the best graphics 'till now.... ohhh and about the thing you wrote at the end about joining these two armies, it's really not the same, it's alot different then what you see at the game....

Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts

yes AF will make textures in the distance sharper.

Another thing that helps cod 4 look better is

r_lodbiasrigid -1000

r_lodbiasskinned -1000

basically this makes things like models have no pop in at all. Most noticable on cars, just move back from one in default and you see it loses detail at a certain distance, with those commands full detail any distance, can hurt fps obviously.

nutcrackr

how much does this hurt fps? and do you have to do it every time you play? what exactly does it do, give more details no matter what distance?

and the graphics are great, just not next gen like anything on unreal 3 engine or crysis

Avatar image for acsguitar
acsguitar

1840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#15 acsguitar
Member since 2005 • 1840 Posts

[QUOTE="Ark-Angel-04"]the graphics in this game are crap weirjf

opinions given by graphics whores are a waste of bandwidth

the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04

Thats the weird thing about this game to me...Although I dont' think they are crap there are some levels where it seems out of wack graphically. Like when you raid the houses looking for Al Asad in Russia.

Then you go play the Gilli level and its absolutely amazing.. Strange how this game has half non impressive visual levels and the other half are amazing.

Avatar image for Thumper
Thumper

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Thumper
Member since 2002 • 88 Posts
I've played the sp through twice on different graphic settings & the game looks great either way! I just rebuilt my system to run upcoming games & it's well worth it! I run Crysis on full graphics & the game is beautiful!! If you've got a good system, play with the graphic settings, tweek them & see what they look like. I run a built system: GeForce 8800 super clocked. 4 gigs of Ram, Asus MB, Dual core quad prrocesser clocked to 3.0, my games look great!!!!!
Avatar image for damstr
damstr

8217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 damstr
Member since 2003 • 8217 Posts

Multiplayer is awesome. I'm running the game completely maxed out @ 1920x1280 and it runs smooth as butter. Never any slow downs. I was really surprised.

I was awesome at previous CoD games and CoD 4 is no differnet, in free for all, I've only gotten 2nd once and that was my 2nd free for all game.

2 hrs play time so far. 278 kills, and about 120 deaths. This game rocks! :D

Avatar image for Arson06
Arson06

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Arson06
Member since 2007 • 35 Posts

Multiplayer is awesome. I'm running the game completely maxed out @ 1920x1280 and it runs smooth as butter. Never any slow downs. I was really surprised.

I was awesome at previous CoD games and CoD 4 is no differnet, in free for all, I've only gotten 2nd once and that was my 2nd free for all game.

2 hrs play time so far. 278 kills, and about 120 deaths. This game rocks! :D

damstr
I'll mess you up ... ;)
Avatar image for matalobos
matalobos

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 matalobos
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
Poor boy
Avatar image for CaNiBuSKiD69
CaNiBuSKiD69

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 CaNiBuSKiD69
Member since 2002 • 603 Posts
AF will technically make the game more immersive, but not necerssarily change the graphics. AF will only make the textures in the distance more visible and in detail, which can really effect performance. Make sure you have your resolution turned up, turn on glow, and depth of perception looks really cool too when looking down iron sights or thru scope. The graphics on multiplayer even look amazing... I love the game.
Avatar image for Tsunami23
Tsunami23

1352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Tsunami23
Member since 2004 • 1352 Posts

Actually, the graphics on the Xbox360 compared to the PC with all settings turned up are hardly noticeable. I've played both...

That being said, WASD for the win :P

Avatar image for bkrawk
bkrawk

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 bkrawk
Member since 2007 • 423 Posts
charlie don't surf is a great graphical lookin level
Avatar image for OtakuRay
OtakuRay

658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 OtakuRay
Member since 2007 • 658 Posts

the graphics in this game are crap Ark-Angel-04

U are blind!

Avatar image for MrBrowneye
MrBrowneye

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MrBrowneye
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
the graphics look sweet from afar, but once u take a closer look, the textures startwash outand become distorted. The light switches are mere textures on the wall-they have no definition. All of the textures start to become distorted, even the ground textures areblurred out whenwhen u look at it for petes sake! And the initial boat infiltration sequence has the most HORRENDOUS water effects that i have seen since Medal of Honor Frontline. Believe me, i tried to convince my self that these graphics were amazing, and they still are goodfor the most part, but they are nothing execeptional compared to Crysis, Gears of War, or even Halo 3! On the back of the box, a testimonial states: "This is the most photorealistic game that i have ever seen"-FAR FROM IT! Dont believe me? Take a closer look when u play next time. I know i am nitpicking, but it is these little things that really suck u into the game.
Avatar image for MrBrowneye
MrBrowneye

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MrBrowneye
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
ya totally there is almost no innovation in the series except for perks and a new atmosphere. And honestly, the graphics are nothing special, especially the textures
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
The mp map Ambush has the most photorealistic graphics I've seen.
Avatar image for xmg0
xmg0

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 xmg0
Member since 2005 • 1060 Posts

No game looks good after Crysis.

/tear at being spoiled