Can i run bc2 on low on this pc

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Just at like 20 fps

Amd120 2.20 GHZ

HD 4250 256 MB Mobility

2 gb ddr3

i don't think i will be able to but i thought i would ask.

I bought it off steam thinking my gaming pc would be working this week, but it turns out its going to be atleast another week or to, and i really want to play it.

Avatar image for Stinger78
Stinger78

5846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Stinger78
Member since 2003 • 5846 Posts

Maybe, and even then not very smooth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYbAvQtKsL8

Avatar image for Mitjastiskovski
Mitjastiskovski

327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mitjastiskovski
Member since 2004 • 327 Posts

No chance IMO. I tried running BC2 on a laptop with AMD dual core 2.1Ghz cpu and and HD4200 on low and I got like 10 fps. I was running it on 800x600 and everything on low.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

negative.. gpu and cpu are both insufficiant for the task at hand. sorry :S it would run all the older battlefields though if thats any consolation :S

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Alright thanks, i can run bf2 on low. I guess if i want to play some battlefield i will have to play that or battlefield free to play. I wasn't sure how far i could drop the graphics down

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

Alright thanks, i can run bf2 on low. I guess if i want to play some battlefield i will have to play that or battlefield free to play. I wasn't sure how far i could drop the graphics down

James161324

that being said if you have codmw1 or 2 you can play either on medium herp derp ;P

Avatar image for Adam_the_Nerd
Adam_the_Nerd

4403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Adam_the_Nerd
Member since 2006 • 4403 Posts
Definitely not. If the videocard was newer by about a year and the processor a little better, then yes.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Alright thanks, i can run bf2 on low. I guess if i want to play some battlefield i will have to play that or battlefield free to play. I wasn't sure how far i could drop the graphics down

ionusX

that being said if you have codmw1 or 2 you can play either on medium herp derp ;P

i have to doubt that, i couldn't play it on my dual core with my intergeted pos graphics card at 800 by 600 at low.

Looking at the mimmium i may be able to play it at low

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

Im not sure, I somehow doubt it, It is a very well optimized game, make no mistake, but it is far more cpu intensive then I thought, If you would be able to run it, the best bet would be the sp part, since that seemed to require far less then the far more taxing MP part.

my advice tho would be to wait, BFBC2 will give you a really good first impression if you are sitting on just a mid range machine, but lower then that, and I think your first impression would be far more negative.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Im not sure, I somehow doubt it, It is a very well optimized game, make no mistake, but it is far more cpu intensive then I thought, If you would be able to run it, the best bet would be the sp part, since that seemed to require far less then the far more taxing MP part.

my advice tho would be to wait, BFBC2 will give you a really good first impression if you are sitting on just a mid range machine, but lower then that, and I think your first impression would be far more negative.

Maddie_Larkin

I heard it was tough on the cpu, i played alot of bc2 on the 360.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

[QUOTE="Maddie_Larkin"]

Im not sure, I somehow doubt it, It is a very well optimized game, make no mistake, but it is far more cpu intensive then I thought, If you would be able to run it, the best bet would be the sp part, since that seemed to require far less then the far more taxing MP part.

my advice tho would be to wait, BFBC2 will give you a really good first impression if you are sitting on just a mid range machine, but lower then that, and I think your first impression would be far more negative.

James161324

I heard it was tough on the cpu, i played alot of bc2 on the 360.

Yeah ^^ I was a bit astonished aswell, there are more players per server, but even then, My (admitedly very old C2D 3.0 Ghz) were under somewhere of 90% load constantly, when the battles were breaking out, Rush seemed to do the most.

That did surprise me. Whatis more odd is that my GPU (a GF260) never got over 50 degrees when playing, and itneverseems to dip below 30 (that I noticed, I do have EVGA precission running in the corner). Which was a very welcome surprise.

So either those last 8 players does alotagainst the cpu, or there is something else that makes it cpu intensive. It DOES look impressive tho, and a quite neat thing is that the last maps released (update 7 was it?) Has fairly big maps, nowhere near BF2, but they are bigger less crowded, and more tactical then the clutted smaller maps, they are a real joy to play.

Avatar image for Morgan_Kell
Morgan_Kell

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Morgan_Kell
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
That PC of yours is probably not fast enough to run the game with a playable performance :(
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
No. I can barely run the game on low with my setup.