CCP gets hit hard.. could lose millions in revenue

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

ccp the devleoper for eve online is in seriously dangerous waters atm. after they opted to input actually useful stuff for a high price into the eve online store. players were annoyed that they would need to pay for these as well on top of monthly fee's unless they wanted the game to start favoring those with the fatest wallets. so out of protest subscriptions got cancelled by the bucket full and the last count was at 5.5k users leaving. thats roguhly a yearly income slash of 1 million US dollars!

ccp go scared and is now in talked with delegates from the online community to try & work out an agreement.

http://www.vg247.com/2011/06/28/eve-online-protests-could-cost-ccp-1-million/

Avatar image for Rusteater
Rusteater

4080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Rusteater
Member since 2004 • 4080 Posts

$70 for an in-game monocle??? :lol:

And here I thought $20 for a steed in LOTRO was a bit much!

Glad I'm not a part of that mess.

Avatar image for XIntoTheBlue
XIntoTheBlue

1070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 XIntoTheBlue
Member since 2009 • 1070 Posts
No surprise there.I happened to be one of those who suspended my subscription with them. It's the best way to make a statement toward them -- with your wallet. Correct me if I am wrong, but CCP is the first and only entity I have seen to take a game which has a monthly subscription fee and add micro-transactions on top of it. In my opinion, this alone can create sour sentiment among customers because monthly subscriptions are in place so that the devs can continue support of the game. That is what sets such games apart from games that you only need to pay once. It's a real poor move by CCP.
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

Correct me if I am wrong, but CCP is the first and only entity I have seen to take a game which has a monthly subscription fee and add micro-transactions on top of it.XIntoTheBlue
WOW did it too with mounts and possibly other things.

I hope the players are actually following through with their plans. It's pretty despicable to have to pay monthly and then not get the content you are paying them to develop.

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#5 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only stuff they have microtransactions for are useless items, right? The stuff that affects gameplay was only mentioned in a "memo" and isn't actually available as a microtransaction? And the useless stuff that you can pay for can also be bought with a large amount of in-game money. As it stands right now, seems like a bit of an overreaction, but as I'm not currently playing, who am I to say. I'm waiting for Incarna to be fully developed before I jump back in.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="XIntoTheBlue"]Correct me if I am wrong, but CCP is the first and only entity I have seen to take a game which has a monthly subscription fee and add micro-transactions on top of it.guynamedbilly

WOW did it too with mounts and possibly other things.

I hope the players are actually following through with their plans. It's pretty despicable to have to pay monthly and then not get the content you are paying them to develop.

they were doing it before WoW i believe.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only stuff they have microtransactions for are useless items, right? The stuff that affects gameplay was only mentioned in a "memo" and isn't actually available as a microtransaction? And the useless stuff that you can pay for can also be bought with a large amount of in-game money. As it stands right now, seems like a bit of an overreaction, but as I'm not currently playing, who am I to say. I'm waiting for Incarna to be fully developed before I jump back in.MyopicCanadian
And guess what? you are the ONLY person who can see your items. Nobody else. So its basically worthless, even just to look at.
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25292 Posts

I hope this sends a message not only to CCP but also other developers.

[QUOTE="XIntoTheBlue"]Correct me if I am wrong, but CCP is the first and only entity I have seen to take a game which has a monthly subscription fee and add micro-transactions on top of it.guynamedbilly

WOW did it too with mounts and possibly other things.

I hope the players are actually following through with their plans. It's pretty despicable to have to pay monthly and then not get the content you are paying them to develop.

EQ2, station cash. Around the time I quit as well.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
The thing is that a mail got leaked that said something like "Greed is good" "Selling special ammo and stuff". Not only that all money right now go to 2 games that will both fail (yes they will i called it here).
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

well they deserver it if they start charing for stuff that gives and edge in game + suscription based. i always like to see greedy companies getting what they deserver for their greed

Avatar image for supertrooper23
supertrooper23

900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 supertrooper23
Member since 2007 • 900 Posts

lol they got scared... hahaha... i hope things turn out well for the eve players. if it had gone through though id probably come back to eve and buy a few battleships/titans.

Avatar image for TentacleMayor
TentacleMayor

1469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 TentacleMayor
Member since 2008 • 1469 Posts
This is bollocks. If they don't stop it I'm not resubscribing.
Avatar image for battlespectre
BattleSpectre

7989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 BattleSpectre
Member since 2009 • 7989 Posts

Tahaha aw man that was a good read. Serves them right.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

And i laugh at 13 dollar hats

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
[QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"]Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only stuff they have microtransactions for are useless items, right? The stuff that affects gameplay was only mentioned in a "memo" and isn't actually available as a microtransaction? And the useless stuff that you can pay for can also be bought with a large amount of in-game money. As it stands right now, seems like a bit of an overreaction, but as I'm not currently playing, who am I to say. I'm waiting for Incarna to be fully developed before I jump back in.kris9031998
And guess what? you are the ONLY person who can see your items. Nobody else. So its basically worthless, even just to look at.

Which is why I don't understand all the outrage.
Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts
[QUOTE="kris9031998"][QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"]Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only stuff they have microtransactions for are useless items, right? The stuff that affects gameplay was only mentioned in a "memo" and isn't actually available as a microtransaction? And the useless stuff that you can pay for can also be bought with a large amount of in-game money. As it stands right now, seems like a bit of an overreaction, but as I'm not currently playing, who am I to say. I'm waiting for Incarna to be fully developed before I jump back in.shakmaster13
And guess what? you are the ONLY person who can see your items. Nobody else. So its basically worthless, even just to look at.

Which is why I don't understand all the outrage.

The outrage stems from the possibility of game-changing advantages being sold in the Nex store. Items such as ships, ammo, or other benefits were discussed in the "Greed is Good?" newsletter. The reason this caused such a stir is because the mere discussion of this is a betrayal of the playerbase, as the devs had said on numerous occasions that they would never pursue micro-transactions, much less ones that affect gameplay.
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#17 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="MythPro1"][QUOTE="shakmaster13"][QUOTE="kris9031998"] And guess what? you are the ONLY person who can see your items. Nobody else. So its basically worthless, even just to look at.

Which is why I don't understand all the outrage.

The outrage stems from the possibility of game-changing advantages being sold in the Nex store. Items such as ships, ammo, or other benefits were discussed in the "Greed is Good?" newsletter. The reason this caused such a stir is because the mere discussion of this is a betrayal of the playerbase, as the devs had said on numerous occasions that they would never pursue micro-transactions, much less ones that affect gameplay.

Also don't understand the outrage. An in-game memo for a company brainstorming the ways it can make money? I doubt any of that would have ever come into fruition. And that's practically proven now. If 5,000 accounts have been cancelled because of a monocle and hats.................
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="shakmaster13"][QUOTE="kris9031998"] And guess what? you are the ONLY person who can see your items. Nobody else. So its basically worthless, even just to look at.MythPro1
Which is why I don't understand all the outrage.

The outrage stems from the possibility of game-changing advantages being sold in the Nex store. Items such as ships, ammo, or other benefits were discussed in the "Greed is Good?" newsletter. The reason this caused such a stir is because the mere discussion of this is a betrayal of the playerbase, as the devs had said on numerous occasions that they would never pursue micro-transactions, much less ones that affect gameplay.

seriously? they just mentioned it and people are already making a big deal? wtf is wrong with people these days.

Avatar image for sinpkr
sinpkr

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 sinpkr
Member since 2010 • 1255 Posts

[QUOTE="MythPro1"][QUOTE="shakmaster13"] Which is why I don't understand all the outrage.Krelian-co

The outrage stems from the possibility of game-changing advantages being sold in the Nex store. Items such as ships, ammo, or other benefits were discussed in the "Greed is Good?" newsletter. The reason this caused such a stir is because the mere discussion of this is a betrayal of the playerbase, as the devs had said on numerous occasions that they would never pursue micro-transactions, much less ones that affect gameplay.

seriously? they just mentioned it and people are already making a big deal? wtf is wrong with people these days.

rlly ccp shouldnt even be thinking about this thou. attempting a pay to win model with one of the most hard core communities means castrophic consequences will happen

Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts

seriously? they just mentioned it and people are already making a big deal? wtf is wrong with people these days.Krelian-co

Because the game is a sandbox built by its players from the ground up, and almost everything available in that universe was created by them as well. Pay to win items have no place there.

Also don't understand the outrage. An in-game memo for a company brainstorming the ways it can make money? I doubt any of that would have ever come into fruition. And that's practically proven now. If 5,000 accounts have been cancelled because of a monocle and hats.................MyopicCanadian

It has little to do with monocles and hats, it's all about staying true to what they claimed on numerous occasions. "Microtransactions won't affect gameplay."

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]seriously? they just mentioned it and people are already making a big deal? wtf is wrong with people these days.MythPro1

Because the game is a sandbox built by its players from the ground up, and almost everything available in that universe was created by them as well. Pay to win items have no place there.

Also don't understand the outrage. An in-game memo for a company brainstorming the ways it can make money? I doubt any of that would have ever come into fruition. And that's practically proven now. If 5,000 accounts have been cancelled because of a monocle and hats.................MyopicCanadian

It has little to do with monocles and hats, it's all about staying true to what they claimed on numerous occasions. "Microtransactions won't affect gameplay."

And they aren't affecting gameplay what seems to be the problem...
Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts

And they aren't affecting gameplay what seems to be the problem...shakmaster13

You're missing the point. Serious discussions were brewing among internal CCP employees about the possibilities of adding ships, ammo, and other bonuses to the Nex store. Items that would enhance a player's abilities should they throw down money. This goes directly in the face of everything they've been saying leading up to this point, that EVE would never have gameplay changing microtransactions.

Just because they're not "in", doesn't mean they're not on the table. That's what players want to know, if CCP will move past vanity-only microtransactions. A question CCP has yet to answer fully and it's been about a week since this whole thing started. For many players, that's some pretty strong writing on the wall.

It's certainly worth "rioting" over because it could have dire consequences on the sandbox elements of the entire game.

Avatar image for rollermint
rollermint

632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 rollermint
Member since 2010 • 632 Posts
Eve Online players seems to be the only community that has the guts and actually clout to really influence the developers. I guess everyone remembers how terrible the NGE really was and no one wants to see that happening again.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Don't go "I don't understand the hate" because it always starts with small meaningless items and grows to a pay to win scenario. And at incredibly high ripoff prices.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
Anyway i was thinking of going back to the game. but i wont. Why? Because i cant support this after everything they have said, done and their inaction. So far they are only trying to buy time they invited a few people over to talk with the devs when they could just talk over the phone. I guess that mean its confirmed :(
Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

I'm really not so upset that a good backlash from the community still has the potential to prevent companies from getting away with practices that are deemed unfair, or at least, burn a hole into their wallets. Carry on.

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
Glad they got a backlash, that is a ******* disgrace to gaming.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#29 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
WOW did it too with mounts and possibly other things.guynamedbilly
its just mounts and non-combat companions. nothing really special.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
They should have known that this was going to backfire.
Avatar image for HavocEbonlore
HavocEbonlore

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 HavocEbonlore
Member since 2007 • 483 Posts

Customer loyalty was definitely not on their list of priorities when they considered rolling this mess out.

Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
ccp has neglected improving eve in order to develop two other games destined to fail with our money. there is no way i will keep my sub under those terms that's why i cancelled.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Um wow. This has really bit CCP in the ass. That's a pretty drastic move as well, EVE players are generally very dedicated, EVE's that kind of game.
Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#34 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

These microntransactions and pay2win **** are getting beyond rediculous. Im glad people are showing ccp that they are not willing to be milked with this crap.

Avatar image for axething
axething

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 axething
Member since 2009 • 59 Posts

Kudos to the EVE community. And what does it mean by "delegates" from the gaming community? CCP will talk to high leveled players or something?

I applaud the community for taking action. It does hurt to be put on an unfair playing field, especially when 95% of the things in that field were crafted/mined/created/etc. by the players themselves.

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
This is the most beautiful thing I've read. I am boycotting all games with micro transactions.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

Don't go "I don't understand the hate" because it always starts with small meaningless items and grows to a pay to win scenario. And at incredibly high ripoff prices.

wis3boi
Seriously, I wonder if these people would have the same attitude if their governments started to have open discussions of adapting Nazism. would they just sit back and say "well it hasn't happened yet, so it isn't time to speak out!" You have to stop these kinds of things BEFORE they happen because it is much harder to fight them when they're already in place.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"] WOW did it too with mounts and possibly other things.yellosnolvr
its just mounts and non-combat companions. nothing really special.

They also had in game fun items you can earn by buying their cruddy TCG and these items seemed like they were meant to be for the engineering profession, many people expect they were.
Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

The best way to vote is with your wallet.

Microtransaction on top of the monthly fee is just absurd.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60740 Posts

EVE has always striked me as a game that is founded almost entirely on its community. Doing anything to piss off that community would not be good, as has been shown.

CCP has a lot of kissing ass and making up to do. For starters, they should give everyone a free monocle and remove all non-vanity items from the store.

Avatar image for IntwoGames
IntwoGames

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 IntwoGames
Member since 2004 • 1243 Posts

EVE has always striked me as a game that is founded almost entirely on its community. Doing anything to piss off that community would not be good, as has been shown.

CCP has a lot of kissing ass and making up to do. For starters, they should give everyone a free monocle and remove all non-vanity items from the store.

mrbojangles25
What non-vanity items?
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60740 Posts

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

EVE has always striked me as a game that is founded almost entirely on its community. Doing anything to piss off that community would not be good, as has been shown.

CCP has a lot of kissing ass and making up to do. For starters, they should give everyone a free monocle and remove all non-vanity items from the store.

IntwoGames

What non-vanity items?

Just going by this:

after they opted to input actually useful stuff for a high price into the eve online store. players were annoyed

ionusX

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#43 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts

Well, on the bright side EVE has setup an example to all other MMORGP developers just what would happen if they go too far with micro-transactions.

ADD: It's not the only MMO with both subscription and micro-transaction. WoW also has micro-transaction both in the form of Pet Store and mounts/pets/toys from Trading Cards. The key difference here of course is that nothing that influences gameplay or is directly useful in endgame PvP or PvE is available from micro-transaction.

If WoW is to succumb to the evils of Activision and start offering raid tokens, epic gear or arena points, expect huge drops even in WoW's massive subscription base as well.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

Don't go "I don't understand the hate" because it always starts with small meaningless items and grows to a pay to win scenario. And at incredibly high ripoff prices.

Nerkcon
Seriously, I wonder if these people would have the same attitude if their governments started to have open discussions of adapting Nazism. would they just sit back and say "well it hasn't happened yet, so it isn't time to speak out!" You have to stop these kinds of things BEFORE they happen because it is much harder to fight them when they're already in place.

Nationalism-Socialism has been nothing but good for the economy and the infrastructure of the countries that adapted such policies. Sure these countries made some minorities scapegoats to unite the masses but in the long term many people would consider it efficient if they looked at it objectively. Also, this is nothing like that. I doubt CCP would put pay to win items that would destroy the whole base of the game. Their monocle is more useless than anything in any MMO's microtransaction shop and only you get to see it IF you are admiring yourself aboard your ship. Really people are just plain overreacting right now.
Avatar image for TentacleMayor
TentacleMayor

1469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 TentacleMayor
Member since 2008 • 1469 Posts
I'm glad there's been an outrage. Even if it was just a 'hypothetical idea', it should be kept at bay lest it become a 'potential idea' and then a 'viable idea' and then +50% damage boosters for $20 in the store. Microtransactions are what separate F2P from P2P. As I see it, the monthly fee is protection from the crappiest and most unfair business model conceivable for the playerbase. Premium, stat-boosting items ruin competition and make a game casual. This 'hypothetical' model of microtransactions in P2P games has potential to seriously ruin the entire genre, especially for PVPers.

Kudos to the EVE community. And what does it mean by "delegates" from the gaming community? CCP will talk to high leveled players or something?

axething
I'm assuming that means the CSM, which is a council of veteran players voted by game subscribers, that represent the playerbase and have frequent contact with the devs regarding gameplay concerns.
Avatar image for Lone_Warrior_66
Lone_Warrior_66

1453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#46 Lone_Warrior_66
Member since 2004 • 1453 Posts
I've actually just started getting into EVE after ignoring it for years. Just hearing the word mirco transactions makes my skin crawl these days. I understand the need for monthly fees in an mmo. Games like EVE and WoW have proven that a monthly fee can be worth it with consistent and overall high quality updates. Micro transactions just seems like a whole different thing especially if the item bought can give players an edge in the game. EVE already had the PLEX system which allows you to buy game time with ingame money effectively creating a bridge between the EVE and real world economy. Although I think this was a nice idea adding micro transactions to this is going to take it to a whole other level.

Personally I am glad so many players stood up. CCP has been working really close with their community in this past so I am pretty sure they'll work something out. If not EVE is probably going to be the shortest mmo I've ever played.