Civilization IV And V Wrong On Alexander The Great

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CommandoAgent
CommandoAgent

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 CommandoAgent
Member since 2005 • 1703 Posts

Alexander the great was the king of Macedonia Not King of Greece however he did unite all the kings of greece however he still was king Of Macedonia i kinda felt sad that they didnt add nor inculde Macedonia as a Civilization.

If Sid Meiers added America its only fair he should have included Canada into the Game :? So what you think on what countries Sid Meiers should add for the next Civilization he might make in the near future?

Avatar image for QQabitmoar
QQabitmoar

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 QQabitmoar
Member since 2011 • 1892 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

Avatar image for James00715
James00715

2484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 James00715
Member since 2003 • 2484 Posts

Sid Meier's doesn't do a lot of the designing these days. He's more of an overseer. He gives input on the various projects they work on, but he hands off most of the design to other people at the company. They put America in because it's an American game and it helps sales of the game. Maybe also because America being a superpower has had a bigger influence on the world (for good and bad), but I think it's mainly the other reason.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
[QUOTE="QQabitmoar"]

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

Which at one point belonged to Romans, which at one point belonged to Dinosaurs, which at one point belonged to Bacteria.... you get the point..
Avatar image for CommandoAgent
CommandoAgent

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 CommandoAgent
Member since 2005 • 1703 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar

Macedonians Would disagree with you on that though with that claim that they are greeks. Oh i didnt know politics wasnt allowed here anymore on gamespot sorry for that then, still i feel Canada Should be added in though.

Avatar image for Tokeism
Tokeism

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Tokeism
Member since 2006 • 2365 Posts
Why would they added Canada to the game? They are part of the British Empire, which is in the game.
Avatar image for ZOD777
ZOD777

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 ZOD777
Member since 2010 • 305 Posts

I know there are a bunch of DLC factions which I have none of, but I think that the Vikings belong in there if it isn't DLC.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
I used to have issues with America being in Civ games, but you just have to keep in mind that the game is not intended to mimic history. The game doesn't even take place on the planet earth unless you use a custom map. America is included because they are a world power. All world powers should be included, both modern and ancient.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

I know there are a bunch of DLC factions which I have none of, but I think that the Vikings belong in there if it isn't DLC.

ZOD777

They are a DLC.

Avatar image for lge777
lge777

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 lge777
Member since 2003 • 2507 Posts

Alexander the great was the king of Macedonia Not King of Greece however he did unite all the kings of greece however he still was king Of Macedonia i kinda felt sad that they didnt add nor inculde Macedonia as a Civilization.

If Sid Meiers added America its only fair he should have included Canada into the Game :? So what you think on what countries Sid Meiers should add for the next Civilization he might make in the near future?

CommandoAgent

Canada never was or had a Empire they would basicly just be a city state at most. Canada still worships the Queen of England and has her on there money and acts more like a common wealth of England.

Avatar image for lge777
lge777

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 lge777
Member since 2003 • 2507 Posts

Alexander the great was the king of Macedonia Not King of Greece however he did unite all the kings of greece however he still was king Of Macedonia i kinda felt sad that they didnt add nor inculde Macedonia as a Civilization.

If Sid Meiers added America its only fair he should have included Canada into the Game :? So what you think on what countries Sid Meiers should add for the next Civilization he might make in the near future?

CommandoAgent

Canada never was or had a Empire they would basicly just be a city state at most. Canada still worships the Queen of England and has her on there money and acts more like a common wealth of England.

Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar
Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.
Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar
Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.
Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar
Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.
Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar

Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.

Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar

Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.

Avatar image for SrpskiVojnik
SrpskiVojnik

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SrpskiVojnik
Member since 2011 • 166 Posts

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

QQabitmoar

Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
Holy "We get the point" batman...
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts

Looks like someone got bonked big time.:P

Avatar image for simardbrad
simardbrad

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 simardbrad
Member since 2004 • 2355 Posts

Wow somebody didn't understand that you only press the "Submit" button once.

Avatar image for QQabitmoar
QQabitmoar

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 QQabitmoar
Member since 2011 • 1892 Posts

[QUOTE="QQabitmoar"]

I would prove you wrong. But if I do, this thread is gonna degrade into a political debate, since I just happen to be from Greece. Anyway, you are terribly wrong, everything indicates that the ancient Macedonians were, in fact, as Greek as it gets. Modern Macedonia (see, unlike most Greeks I realise it's stupid to call them FYROM now...) are Slavs. Revise your history abit.

Political debate incoming...

Screw it, imma just go sleep.

SrpskiVojnik

Language has little to do with the origin of Macedonians because genetically, Macedonians are more native Balkanite than Slavic (Macedonians and Russians are not same). Additionally, the idea of a Greece didn't even exist back then. Only the Romans called the peninsula Greece. The name was later used to unify all peoples living on the southern portion of the Balkan peninsula during the 19th century into a nation-state supported by the British with romanticist views of ancient Balkans. All this only occurred because the Christians there didn't like the idea of living in a Islam-dominated Empire and wanted to live in a Christian country instead. Before then, the people who lived in the Eastern Roman Empire (note. the concept of a Byzantine Empire never existed as it was only a name given by modern scholars to describe the Eastern Roman Empire) after the fall of Rome only called themselves Roman and continued to do so until the fall of Constantinople. So, any idea of real continunity between ancient Greeks and modern Greeks is laughable.

Did I imply anywhere that there's a continuity between modern and ancient Greeks? The history of the Balkans is a total mess, we are more Slavik and Albanian than anything else. But the concept of Greece existed back then. Not as a nation, as the concept of nation didn't exist, but as a people. Try reading some ancient Greek writers, they recognised themselves as Greeks, despite being divided in city-states and constantly in war with one another. Any city-state, colony, they recognised themselves as Greeks, not as part of a nation, but as part of a genral civilisation. They used to call anyone who wasn't Greek a 'barbarian', not with the same meaning it has today, it just meant non-Greek back then. Sure, they were Athenian, Spartan, Conrinthian first, but they knew they were also Greek.

As for modern Greece, when the revolution started in the 19th century, influenced by the ideas of the French revolution, the people back then saw themselves closer to the Byzantine (I know about the term without you needind to tell me about, Byzantio was a Greek colony in the area before the Roman Emperror Constantine moved the capital there in the 4th century) Empire than Ancient Greece. To them, the Parthenon was just a bunch of rocks that they had even made into a church for a while. As for the state, it was because of the notion of the 'Eastern Problem', how the great powers of the time wanted to divide the Ottoam Empire, which was in a very long and steady decline since the death of Emperor Suleiman.

The British had the best offer, but the overall creation of the state back then wasn't after the rebels achieved considerable victories, which led to the slauguter of Christians in major Ottoman cities, which led to the rebels slaughtering Muslims wherever they found them, and that pretty much said to the great powers of the time, Britain, Russia, Prussia, France, that there couldn't be a diplomatic solution to the problem. Thus, when the rebellion was about to be subsided by the Ottomans, the combined French, British and Russian fleets intervened.

Also, the Eastern Roman Empire was heavily influenced by the Greeks of the time. To the point that, Emperor Heraklius I think it was, changed the official language of the state to Greek, from Latin in the 7th century. All emperors since then also had Greek names.

Anyway, it seems you misinterpreted some parts of my previous post, and just in case you didn't know, there's some bad blood between modern Greece and the country of Macedonia of the name (there's a large region in Greece already called Macedonia) and them changing history left and right.

Now, where do I sign up for the Longest Wall of Text Ever contest?

And before you ask, yes, I really am that bored.

Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
The game doesn't try to be historically accurate.