CoD WaW

Just curious, was I the only one dissappointed in Call of Duty World at War? I mean the single player, for me was glitchy from the start, and the multiplayer seemed lack luster compared to COD4. I was extremely dissappointed that they added vehicles to the multiplayer, that just seemed to make the game unbalanced.

The Russian missions were awesome though

I agree with the guy above. American Campaign < Russian Campaign

But, I perfer the weapon selection in World at War (I really like the Bolt Actions and Rifle).

Just curious, was I the only one dissappointed in Call of Duty World at War? I mean the single player, for me was glitchy from the start, and the multiplayer seemed lack luster compared to COD4. I was extremely dissappointed that they added vehicles to the multiplayer, that just seemed to make the game unbalanced.

lpjazzman220

I really think that COD 4 was much better

i still like CoD 4 betterjrabbit99

Vehicles are nothing. I can destroy a tank in less than 3 minutes usually. I just need two stickies and a PTRS and it is a GG for that poor tank driver.

The Soviet campaign is easily the best SP campaign of 2008.

I'd have to say Call of Duty 4 was better. WaW was at least fun to play for a little bit, but it was too easy even on the hard diff. :(

It was alright, nothing special, but would you expect?

At least they bumped up the textures a bit from 4, didn't hurt eyes so much. I was mainly disapointed in the sounds, specifically, the weapon sounds. They were just too soft and muffled, feels like shooting a pea shooter.

Vehicles are nothing. I can destroy a tank in less than 3 minutes usually. I just need two stickies and a PTRS and it is a GG for that poor tank driver.

k0r3aN_pR1d3

the point is, in a competitive game that cod waw tries to be, being god for 3minutes in a tank is really unbalanced