COD: World at War Preview - IGN

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#1 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

There is a nice preview here on IGN that talks about some of the features of the upcoming game: Check it out and tell me what you think!

http://au.pc.ign.com/articles/883/883374p1.html

Avatar image for morpheus077
morpheus077

1095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 morpheus077
Member since 2006 • 1095 Posts
whooooo checking now!
Avatar image for Grim_Wolf88
Grim_Wolf88

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 Grim_Wolf88
Member since 2006 • 901 Posts
I've been waiting for CoD to do a take on the Pacific Theatre and this seems like it's gonna be it and some more fighting for the motherland too. Though the CoD not produced by IW have always been touchy except for the third which was pretty good. I think I'm in a small group by saying this but I'm glad they went back to WW2. Mordern Warfare is just meh...
Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
Sounds Great, thanks for the link. Althought not by Infinity Ward, I want to see how this turns out
CVG (Well, PCZONE) have also previewed the game, for those who haven't seen it.


"
The raid of Makin Island, one of the first levels, starts with you tied to a chair, faced with a smug Japanese general.

He puffs cigar smoke in your face, before turning to one of your comrades and shouting appropriately phrased Japanese at him.

All standard fare until he takes that cigar and stubs it in your mate's eye, the blood-curdling scream making even fellow enemies squirm, before they move into full-blown shock when he slits your comrade's throat, spattering blood across the wall and the dead man's shadow.

As the general grabs you by the hair and readies to kill you, there's shouting, footsteps and a knife in your captor's back. A marine pulls you to your feet, assures you you're safe and shoves a gun into your hand, asking if you can fight.
"




"
Flashlights suddenly blind us and a bunch of manic Japanese soldiers leap from the foliage. One primes a grenade and grabs a soldier in a suicidal embrace, winning a grim victory.

World at War's stated aim is to move away from convention, removing the stodge from a tired genre with new vistas, under-exposed theatres of war, and a new angle on storytelling.
"




"Multiplayer-wise PC gamers will be treated to 32-player free-for-all battles (much larger than on World at War's console versions).

That means, with the promised dedication to mappers and modders, we can expect some epic combat scenarios. Also new to the multiplayer is the cross-map squad feature.
"
Avatar image for Kuyt19
Kuyt19

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 Kuyt19
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts
Doesn't look as bad as i feared. But i've yet to see any significant improvement from the last game.
Avatar image for gamerguy845
gamerguy845

2074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 gamerguy845
Member since 2007 • 2074 Posts
thanks, I wonder how this game will turn out
Avatar image for pwilletts
pwilletts

881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 pwilletts
Member since 2006 • 881 Posts
Looks pretty good. People are still gonna bash it though because its being made by Treyarch.
Avatar image for deactivated-64b76bd048860
deactivated-64b76bd048860

4363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-64b76bd048860
Member since 2007 • 4363 Posts
Looks great!
Avatar image for shalashaska88
shalashaska88

3198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 shalashaska88
Member since 2005 • 3198 Posts

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#10 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

shalashaska88

Did you like the COD expansion pack? I didn't know they made that!!

Avatar image for shalashaska88
shalashaska88

3198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#11 shalashaska88
Member since 2005 • 3198 Posts
[QUOTE="shalashaska88"]

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

biggest_loser

Did you like the COD expansion pack? I didn't know they made that!!

Really? Well I actually liked United Offensive... Guess we can't write off Treyarch just yet.

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="shalashaska88"]

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

shalashaska88

Did you like the COD expansion pack? I didn't know they made that!!

Really? Well I actually liked United Offensive... Guess we can't write off Treyarch just yet.

I think CoD: UO is the best. Anyway CoD:WaW doesn't look as bad as I expected.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#13 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="shalashaska88"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="shalashaska88"]

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

thusaha

Did you like the COD expansion pack? I didn't know they made that!!

Really? Well I actually liked United Offensive... Guess we can't write off Treyarch just yet.

I think CoD: UO is the best. Anyway CoD:WaW doesn't look as bad as I expected.

Hehe!

The people are starting to warm to it!

Treyarch and I are winning the public back!! :D

Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts

Sounds good, but they should let us be the germans and the japanese

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#15 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

Sounds good, but they should let us be the germans and the japanese

Artosa

Interesting point - I hope the Japanese are not portrayed as just evil - a movie called Letters From Iwo Jima gave a very different (and perhaps more realistic) view of Japanese soldiers in WWII.

Avatar image for gotcha455
gotcha455

2611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 gotcha455
Member since 2006 • 2611 Posts

Loser, it's great to hear from ya again, not sure if you remember me. I see your still taking pride in every thread you make :)

The game looks great. However, the fact about Treyarch making CoD:UO seemed a little funky to me. If you look at the details here on Gamespot, you'll see they've labeled UO's developed as Gray Matter, the studio resposible for Return to Castle Wolfenstein...... Whatever. IW is great, but remember that CoD3 wasn't on PC, but was still a very good WW2 game.

Avatar image for gotcha455
gotcha455

2611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 gotcha455
Member since 2006 • 2611 Posts
[QUOTE="Artosa"]

Sounds good, but they should let us be the germans and the japanese

biggest_loser

Interesting point - I hope the Japanese are not portrayed as just evil - a movie called Letters From Iwo Jima gave a very different (and perhaps more realistic) view of Japanese soldiers in WWII.

How was that film? I figger anything with Clint as director is worth watching!

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#18 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

Loser, it's great to hear from ya again, not sure if you remember me. I see your still taking pride in every thread you make :)

The game looks great. However, the fact about Treyarch making CoD:UO seemed a little funky to me. If you look at the details here on Gamespot, you'll see they've labeled UO's developed as Gray Matter, the studio resposible for Return to Castle Wolfenstein...... Whatever. IW is great, but remember that CoD3 wasn't on PC, but was still a very good WW2 game.

gotcha455

Of course I remember you ...and our many GTA: San Andreas debates :P

I shall investigate this cover up about the developer however. Surely IGN wouldn't have gotten that wrong.

All I read about COD3 on console was that it was good but it just lacked a little bit of polish.

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
Yeah, Gray Matter developed UO, not Treyarch.
Avatar image for fireandcloud
fireandcloud

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 fireandcloud
Member since 2005 • 5118 Posts

gametrailers has some nice...trailers for the game. it looks interesting; somehow, it seems the graphics aren't as good as those in cod4 - that's probably not the case, but something looked a bit off with the game (edit: i think it's the expressionless faces; but the trees and stuff look really nice). i dunno. since iw isn't developing this one, i'm not THAT excited, but at least the setting will be different from all other ww2 shooters.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

Avatar image for clash76-grunger
clash76-grunger

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 clash76-grunger
Member since 2008 • 1203 Posts
i am going to buy it.
Avatar image for clash76-grunger
clash76-grunger

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 clash76-grunger
Member since 2008 • 1203 Posts
i am going to buy it.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Yeah, Gray Matter developed UO, not Treyarch.thusaha

Xatrix (Kingpin, Quake 2 expansion etc) is also known as Gray Matter, and they created RTCW and UO too. They were merged with Treyarch a few years ago.

Avatar image for bogaty
bogaty

4750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#24 bogaty
Member since 2003 • 4750 Posts

Looks like another rat-in-a-maze rail shooter that you watch more than play. Can't really expect anything else from the COD series, though.

Wonder if the levels will be plagiarized from film, novels, and TV as blatantly as they were in previous COD games. The scene from the Makin Atoll level described above sounds like it was pulled straight from a 1940s movie called Gung Ho! (not the 80s one with Michael Keaton). I'm sure we can expect to see levels pulled straight from some old John Wayne pics like Fighting SeaBees and Sands of Iwo Jima as well as from newer works like Thin Red Line and the two Clint Eastwood flicks.

As for BL's contention that Flags of Our Fathers offers up a more realistic portrayal of Japanese soldiers during WWII, that's simply not the case. I lived in Japan for 10 years, speak the language and went to see the film there with some Japanese friends (two of whom are history teachers) and they all thought it was very poorly done. The consensus was that Clint either didn't understand the mindset of the Japanese soldier at all or that he consciously changed the way they spoke and behaved so that Western audiences could empathise with them.

I'm still waiting for a good Pacific Theatre game. MOH:PA had some nice levels and touches, but overall it was mediocre (and the flying levels were god-awful!), Hidden and Dangerous had two fantastic levels which took place in Burma, but two levels wasn't enough. Deadly Dozen: Pacific Theatre was pretty damned good for a budget title, but suffered from some really bad AI. I never played any of the History Channel ones, so I can't comment on those other than to say that they look bed enough that I have no interest in ever trying them.

Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts
I always love you posts bogaty, great post.
Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts
your*
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Yo, check this out:

Treyarch is convinced this won't suffer from Yet Another World War II Shooter ennui, mostly because much of the game is set in the Pacific theatre rather than Europe. It's been done before, most notably by EA's leaden Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault, but there's a single phrase which defines this new approach - 'survival horror.'

Your Japanese enemies are not simple reskins of COD4's insurgents - they're a different type of foe entirely, with their own devious AI, designed to evoke the fearlessness and unflinching dedication of the Imperial Japanese Army. Think the Vietcong, but in the 1940s. This indefatigable foe lies in wait, in pits and in trees, not moving a muscle until an unaware Yankee passes. If faced with insurmountable odds, rather than staying behind cover they'll suicide charge the enemy with bayonets - they might only take down one guy in the process, but that guy might well be you.


While CODs to date have favoured a bombastic shooting gallery of pop-up baddies charging in waves, the idea in WAW's Pacific levels is that every scrap of scenery is a potential trap. Paranoia will be your main driving force. Every corpse could be faking it, every tree could hide a sniper, each patch of long grass is a potential death-trap. Which is why flamethrowers are so important. Oh yes, flamethrowers. Traditionally a preposterous archetype of sillier shooters, in WAW they have an accurate and essential purpose. In an oppressive locale of dense trees and tall grass, fire is your best hope of flushing out hidden threats. Which means new hotness for the graphics engine - palm leaves wither and collapse, their burning branches igniting the grassland below when they hit the floor. Wooden barriers are vulnerable and destructible too, which should mean a canny evolution of COD4's shoot-through-the-scenery shtick.

Reinforcing WAW's fire theme, Molotov cocktails and flame tanks will play a part in this war-ending siege. While Treyarch is pretty tight-lipped on details for now, this was a time when the vengeful Russians were positively baying for German blood - couple that with WAW's mature rating and we're likely in for a dramatically more brutal take on the WW2 FPS.Treyarch refused to share details on the plotline (beyond hinting there'll be some celebrity voices), but it seems unlikely the Russians' path of murder and rape across Germany will be entirely reflected.

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=158302

Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts
maybe we will see shrepnel wounds and dismemberment when a grenade goes off or someone is it by artillery this time
Avatar image for gamehostreviews
gamehostreviews

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 gamehostreviews
Member since 2007 • 176 Posts

Wonder if the levels will be plagiarized from film, novels, and TV as blatantly as they were in previous COD games. The scene from the Makin Atoll level described above sounds like it was pulled straight from a 1940s movie called Gung Ho!

bogaty

It has been forever since I've seen that movie. Next time I watch it, I'll try to see what parts you say they stole for the game. Honestly, I don't remember it that well.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#30 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
BIA just can't escape from this series!!
Avatar image for fireandcloud
fireandcloud

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 fireandcloud
Member since 2005 • 5118 Posts

they're a different type of foe entirely, with their own devious AI, designed to evoke the fearlessness and unflinching dedication of the Imperial Japanese Army. Think the Vietcong, but in the 1940s. This indefatigable foe lies in wait, in pits and in trees, not moving a muscle until an unaware Yankee passes. If faced with insurmountable odds, rather than staying behind cover they'll suicide charge the enemy with bayonets - they might only take down one guy in the process, but that guy might well be you.

enemies that don't move a muscle while lying in wait, suicide charge at the enemies - funny how this new devious a.i. sounds like all the bad a.i. of the past. :P

Avatar image for wood_duck
wood_duck

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 wood_duck
Member since 2007 • 990 Posts
Its shaping up nicely, i have faith in Treyarch.
Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="shalashaska88"]

We'll just have to wait and see. Maybe Treyarch can rekindle my long lost love towards WW2 shooters.

Maybe.

biggest_loser

Did you like the COD expansion pack? I didn't know they made that!!

United Offensive? No Gray Matter did that...Tryarch have only made CoD2: Big Red One and CoD3

Avatar image for Jinroh_basic
Jinroh_basic

6413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Jinroh_basic
Member since 2002 • 6413 Posts

Gray Matter was acquired and combined to Treyarch.

i'm not terribly interested in World at War; i would instead look forward to a quality CoD4 expansion pack....don't see it coming tho.

Avatar image for CavalAnts
CavalAnts

398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 CavalAnts
Member since 2008 • 398 Posts
Looks very promising. I hope it turns out good.
Avatar image for Sonir77
Sonir77

1846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Sonir77
Member since 2006 • 1846 Posts
Looks good I guess
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts
I dont understand what people are scared of. CoD 3 was really good both single and multiplayer. Frankly I had more fun with sp in the third one than in the newest game, which bored the hell out of me. Still I hate the idea of again going back to WW2.