This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Trenthan
Trenthan

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Trenthan
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Ey guys i looking at building a computer im stuck however on what CPU to get and thus the m/b according to what i pick

A 920 here is $50 more expensive than the q9550 and i hear it kicks it arse (Is it true???) however im stuck with what to do for m/b

The core i7's do they really need overclocking?, i can get a m/b for ~400 which isnt the best for o/c or around 550 which is gud for o/c is it necessary to overclock? or will it be in the near future. (Also stupid question if i say get a the $550 Asus m/b can i use it until they change the cpu socket type or will i need to change it if i go and buy a new processor in a year or twos time??)

Im looking at a ati 4870x2 so im tyring to aviod any bottle necks any suggestion im happy to ponder over so suggest ahead

Thanks in advance Trent

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#2 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
the 920 is an improvement but not a huge increase in performance from the q9550 but then agian I never tested it so I can't say much
Avatar image for -kaz3-
-kaz3-

7372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -kaz3-
Member since 2006 • 7372 Posts
The 920 beat the extreme 9770 is some benchmarks (if i remember right), and it was comparable in most benchmarks. It all depends on what you're going to be using it for, really. Don't buy an i7 for gaming purposes only since you seem fairly concerned about your budget. There isn't a pronounced performance increase in fps. By all means make the jump if you can afford it.
Avatar image for Trenthan
Trenthan

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Trenthan
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Naw its more i hope to keep it for at least 3years + not just for games also for mi uni cad software, but am debating the preformance increase vs the cost since ddr3 is more pricy again my initial budget was 1500 and i can get a q9550, 4gig ram, m/b, 4870x2, but since i want it for the longer period i was thinking in 2 years time games would start to support multi threading thus the quad will be useful and was tossing up buying an core i7 if the boost warrented the gain. or buying the low core i7 range now and buying a faster processor in 3 years time since most of the cad work i do is mathematical modelling ram and processor are the main requirements

Cheers Trent

Avatar image for skapunkclarence
skapunkclarence

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 skapunkclarence
Member since 2008 • 400 Posts
The Core i7s are the fastest processors in the world, I cannot stress that enough. If you can afford it, buy one!
Avatar image for Trenthan
Trenthan

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Trenthan
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

leaning towards it after read how to o/c a 920 to 4gHz stable lolz ouch ill need a new power supply for the processor + and 4870x2 prob a 1200W to be safe

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2008/11/06/overclocking-intel-core-i7-920/1

Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
its worth it if u have the money but for games the price doesn't warrant the increase for the average consumer. i personally got the q9550 because i didn't have the money for the motherboard and ram. 400 dollars outta my price range.
Avatar image for Sordidus
Sordidus

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Sordidus
Member since 2008 • 2036 Posts
If you want a Quad, Core i7 all the way. There isn't real improvements in games, but that's a problem with graphics cards, not the new processors. You need something like tri-way sli to take advantage of the i7.
Avatar image for XRED_0
XRED_0

775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 XRED_0
Member since 2008 • 775 Posts
I would go for the i7 all the way. Easily getting 4.0ghz stable up from 2.66 is quite an achievement IMO. And 4.0ghz on a quad core would be sick.