Could this handle WoW?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WindWalkerX
WindWalkerX

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 WindWalkerX
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

My girlfriend is addicted to WoW. And ATM I have just one computer. She's always using my computer to "check in" :/ What I'm wanting to do is get a second system on the cheap.

This AMD MB+Sempron looks like a pretty good steal at $20 shipped. Especially since I already have a spare case, PSU, 2gigs of RAM and a GeForce6 for it.

Will this cut it, or am I going to need to get something in the 775, Pentium D range?

Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts
After reading the post I checked the date to see if a 4 year old post somehow made it to the top of the forum.
Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts
After reading the post I checked the date to see if a 4 year old post somehow made it to the top of the forum.tequilasunriser
lmao i did the same... i smell a troll
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

:P sempron trolling i love it.. btw dudes check this out,, truly rotfl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EXkHKPqCj0

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

10/10


Would get trolled again.

Avatar image for whitey_rolls
whitey_rolls

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 whitey_rolls
Member since 2006 • 2547 Posts

In case he's actually not trolling my short answer would be yes, long answer would be no.

Last time I played WoW I was using an E 8400, 4 gigs of DDR 2 800 and a Nvidia 8800 GT and would only get about 30 fps in the city and drop to like 15 fps or even lower sometimes during raiding.

You can obviously drop down all the settings but the performance would be horrible.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

:P sempron trolling i love it.. btw dudes check this out,, truly rotfl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EXkHKPqCj0

ionusX
Those animals look so real!!! That cant be rendered in game!
Avatar image for WindWalkerX
WindWalkerX

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WindWalkerX
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

As well recieved as this was I almost hate to spoil it, lol. I honestly have no idea what a "Sempron troll" is o_O

I'm just a cheap bastard :D

whitey_rolls, thanks for the serious answer. I'll go ahead and look for a Pentium D with an AGP slot. I know that will work, since the one month I tried playing it a few years ago worked just fine with the D.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
It should run fair enough but don't expect it to be amazing looking, and i hope you got a good NIC to go with that or your gonna be in trouble.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

In case he's actually not trolling my short answer would be yes, long answer would be no.

Last time I played WoW I was using an E 8400, 4 gigs of DDR 2 800 and a Nvidia 8800 GT and would only get about 30 fps in the city and drop to like 15 fps or even lower sometimes during raiding.

You can obviously drop down all the settings but the performance would be horrible.

whitey_rolls

Well i run on that processor and only 2Gb of 800mhz ram and i use a 9600GT(less powwerful than 8800GT) and i can run it at 60fps all the time.... even after the visual updates... I think your exaggerating.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

In case he's actually not trolling my short answer would be yes, long answer would be no.

Last time I played WoW I was using an E 8400, 4 gigs of DDR 2 800 and a Nvidia 8800 GT and would only get about 30 fps in the city and drop to like 15 fps or even lower sometimes during raiding.

You can obviously drop down all the settings but the performance would be horrible.

JohnF111

Well i run on that processor and only 2Gb of 800mhz ram and i use a 9600GT(less powwerful than 8800GT) and i can run it at 60fps all the time.... even after the visual updates... I think your exaggerating.

I always call BS on people who claim 60FPS all the time (especially in Dalaran.) Unless your running on low-mid settings, it doesn't seem possible. I have everything on ultra with a GTX 260, 4GB ram, and an AMD 965, playing at 2048x1152 res. I never get 60FPS anywhere anymore except for vanilla zones. I'm hoping Cataclysm will play better with more recent hardware. I know it doesn't look that great, but it's still all open world with a ton of stuff happening on screen. I'd really like to know exactly what DirectX11 features they put in it, since someone discovered an option for it during beta.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]

[QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

In case he's actually not trolling my short answer would be yes, long answer would be no.

Last time I played WoW I was using an E 8400, 4 gigs of DDR 2 800 and a Nvidia 8800 GT and would only get about 30 fps in the city and drop to like 15 fps or even lower sometimes during raiding.

You can obviously drop down all the settings but the performance would be horrible.

ChubbyGuy40

Well i run on that processor and only 2Gb of 800mhz ram and i use a 9600GT(less powwerful than 8800GT) and i can run it at 60fps all the time.... even after the visual updates... I think your exaggerating.

I always call BS on people who claim 60FPS all the time (especially in Dalaran.) Unless your running on low-mid settings, it doesn't seem possible. I have everything on ultra with a GTX 260, 4GB ram, and an AMD 965, playing at 2048x1152 res. I never get 60FPS anywhere anymore except for vanilla zones. I'm hoping Cataclysm will play better with more recent hardware. I know it doesn't look that great, but it's still all open world with a ton of stuff happening on screen. I'd really like to know exactly what DirectX11 features they put in it, since someone discovered an option for it during beta.

Well yeah to start with there's lag, when it has captured all the required data it goes to 60fps(locked) and sits around that level until either i go to another area of dalaran which it can drop to 30-40 and as always it gathers the data required and back up to 60fps... Same for hearthstoning and porting to another city, wow is easy as hell to run its just the data pulling that causes frame rate drops.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#13 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

amd phenom II 945 4 gigs of ram, dual 8800gt in SLI, and in Dalaran I get around 45, down to about 30 as a minimum.. (at 1680x1050)

So in no way, shape,or form is a a e8400 and a single 9600gt gonna max out Wow, at constant 60fps. (anywhere near the same resolution)

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

amd phenom II 945 4 gigs of ram, dual 8800gt in SLI, and in Dalaran I get around 45, down to about 30 as a minimum.. (at 1680x1050)

So in no way, shape,or form is a a e8400 and a single 9600gt gonna max out Wow, at constant 60fps. (anywhere near the same resolution)

Lach0121

1440x900 for me :) And your system means nothing when running wow as its as previously said, server data being transferred... the game and graphics itself are simple as hell... Depends on your connection how laggy it is. I got 20mb broadband so i get all the laggy data fairly quickly, means i don't get as much lag... i can sit in wow with 60fps fairly easily, just if i run around a lot or hearthstone and use portals then obviously its gonna lag and drop my fps cos my NIC is trying to collect data and cant do **** before it has that data.... You see everyone's weapons and armour has to be downloaded from the servers, your internet connection depends on this to happen, all their armour, weapons, stats, abilites, talents, mounts, buffs and enchants are all stored on blizzard's servers and when you see a person(or 100) it all comes via the Network Interface Card, then your NIC sends this data to the GPU if it's an image to be rendered or your CPU if its data to displayed or executions to be carried out... Do you see where i'm headin with this? Without the data your cpu(or gpu) is basically waiting for it... which means you get lag and frame rate drops...

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#15 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

amd phenom II 945 4 gigs of ram, dual 8800gt in SLI, and in Dalaran I get around 45, down to about 30 as a minimum.. (at 1680x1050)

So in no way, shape,or form is a a e8400 and a single 9600gt gonna max out Wow, at constant 60fps. (anywhere near the same resolution)

JohnF111

1440x900 for me :) And your system means nothing when running wow as its as previously said, server data being transferred... the game and graphics itself are simple as hell... Depends on your connection how laggy it is. I got 20mb broadband so i get all the laggy data fairly quickly, means i don't get as much lag... i can sit in wow with 60fps fairly easily, just if i run around a lot or hearthstone and use portals then obviously its gonna lag and drop my fps cos my NIC is trying to collect data and cant do **** before it has that data.... You see everyone's weapons and armour has to be downloaded from the servers, your internet connection depends on this to happen, all their armour, weapons, stats, abilites, talents, mounts, buffs and enchants are all stored on blizzard's servers and when you see a person(or 100) it all comes via the Network Interface Card, then your NIC sends this data to the GPU if it's an image to be rendered or your CPU if its data to displayed or executions to be carried out... Do you see where i'm headin with this? Without the data your cpu(or gpu) is basically waiting for it... which means you get lag and frame rate drops...

I understand full well what you are saying, I have a 8-12mb down connection and a 1-2mb up, my connection is not a problem, I have a 100mb NiC (even if it was 10mb) Its mobo connection (asus m3n ht) again not the problem. Wow doesn't even use a third of the connection anyway. The only way that would be problem is the wires in my network, which are in the process of being upgraded, but that is beside the point.

I understand that it will lag because the latency between the data on the server reaching all your hardware for processing, takes longer than a single player game, that is a given, Standing still does in fact yield better frames (most of the time) but still not to 60 in the busy parts of Dalaran, sorry. especially at 4x multisampling or higher, which I would expect stating maxing the game, and its in the in game options.

I am stating that If I were to buy say a real powerful I core 7 and have it at lets say 3.8-4ghz, with lets say a gtx480, The game will play better than the rig I currently have, SO HARDWARE IS A MAJOR POINT.

Though the Infrastructure of the ISPs around most of the globe, needs some serious overhauls to accommodate some of the problems, you just stated. Limits the bandwidth the game and its servers are allowed to run at anyway. (and especially for things like Onlive) but yea I think we understand one another.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

amd phenom II 945 4 gigs of ram, dual 8800gt in SLI, and in Dalaran I get around 45, down to about 30 as a minimum.. (at 1680x1050)

So in no way, shape,or form is a a e8400 and a single 9600gt gonna max out Wow, at constant 60fps. (anywhere near the same resolution)

Lach0121

1440x900 for me :) And your system means nothing when running wow as its as previously said, server data being transferred... the game and graphics itself are simple as hell... Depends on your connection how laggy it is. I got 20mb broadband so i get all the laggy data fairly quickly, means i don't get as much lag... i can sit in wow with 60fps fairly easily, just if i run around a lot or hearthstone and use portals then obviously its gonna lag and drop my fps cos my NIC is trying to collect data and cant do **** before it has that data.... You see everyone's weapons and armour has to be downloaded from the servers, your internet connection depends on this to happen, all their armour, weapons, stats, abilites, talents, mounts, buffs and enchants are all stored on blizzard's servers and when you see a person(or 100) it all comes via the Network Interface Card, then your NIC sends this data to the GPU if it's an image to be rendered or your CPU if its data to displayed or executions to be carried out... Do you see where i'm headin with this? Without the data your cpu(or gpu) is basically waiting for it... which means you get lag and frame rate drops...

I understand full well what you are saying, I have a 8-12mb down connection and a 1-2mb up, my connection is not a problem, I have a 100mb NiC (even if it was 10mb) Its mobo connection (asus m3n ht) again not the problem. Wow doesn't even use a third of the connection anyway. The only way that would be problem is the wires in my network, which are in the process of being upgraded, but that is beside the point.

I understand that it will lag because the latency between the data on the server reaching all your hardware for processing, takes longer than a single player game, that is a given, Standing still does in fact yield better frames (most of the time) but still not to 60 in the busy parts of Dalaran, sorry. especially at 4x multisampling or higher, which I would expect stating maxing the game, and its in the in game options.

I am stating that If I were to buy say a real powerful I core 7 and have it at lets say 3.8-4ghz, with lets say a gtx480, The game will play better than the rig I currently have, SO HARDWARE IS A MAJOR POINT.

Though the Infrastructure of the ISPs around most of the globe, needs some serious overhauls to accommodate some of the problems, you just stated. Limits the bandwidth the game and its servers are allowed to run at anyway. (and especially for things like Onlive) but yea I think we understand one another.

Ofcourse it'd run better, mostly just display things slightly quicker though or improve on a dipped frame rate quicker than my measly little dual-core... Still my connection allows me a 60fps in dalaran quite often, just some people seem to think the entire game revolves about their machine and not just how massively internet dependant the game is. I think there was a thread saying "WoW needs major optimisation" which is misleading, people brag "My machine is a monster and i get 12fps sometimes"... "What broadband you got?"... "I have 0.5mb broadband"... Self explanatory. If i used a killer broadband deal, killer router and one of those killer NIC PCI-e card things then it would yield much better results than pumping more POWA into my machine.
Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

MMORPGs eat CPUs alive, you'd need a quad core to run it well in heavily populated situations (raids, pvp fight)

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#18 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

MMORPGs eat CPUs alive, you'd need a quad core to run it well in heavily populated situations (raids, pvp fight)

kaitanuvax

bah your claim makes me laugh :P

dual core's over 2.8ghz handle it VERY well.. do go calling 4 core without the benches to proove it..

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#19 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] 1440x900 for me :) And your system means nothing when running wow as its as previously said, server data being transferred... the game and graphics itself are simple as hell... Depends on your connection how laggy it is. I got 20mb broadband so i get all the laggy data fairly quickly, means i don't get as much lag... i can sit in wow with 60fps fairly easily, just if i run around a lot or hearthstone and use portals then obviously its gonna lag and drop my fps cos my NIC is trying to collect data and cant do **** before it has that data.... You see everyone's weapons and armour has to be downloaded from the servers, your internet connection depends on this to happen, all their armour, weapons, stats, abilites, talents, mounts, buffs and enchants are all stored on blizzard's servers and when you see a person(or 100) it all comes via the Network Interface Card, then your NIC sends this data to the GPU if it's an image to be rendered or your CPU if its data to displayed or executions to be carried out... Do you see where i'm headin with this? Without the data your cpu(or gpu) is basically waiting for it... which means you get lag and frame rate drops...

JohnF111

I understand full well what you are saying, I have a 8-12mb down connection and a 1-2mb up, my connection is not a problem, I have a 100mb NiC (even if it was 10mb) Its mobo connection (asus m3n ht) again not the problem. Wow doesn't even use a third of the connection anyway. The only way that would be problem is the wires in my network, which are in the process of being upgraded, but that is beside the point.

I understand that it will lag because the latency between the data on the server reaching all your hardware for processing, takes longer than a single player game, that is a given, Standing still does in fact yield better frames (most of the time) but still not to 60 in the busy parts of Dalaran, sorry. especially at 4x multisampling or higher, which I would expect stating maxing the game, and its in the in game options.

I am stating that If I were to buy say a real powerful I core 7 and have it at lets say 3.8-4ghz, with lets say a gtx480, The game will play better than the rig I currently have, SO HARDWARE IS A MAJOR POINT.

Though the Infrastructure of the ISPs around most of the globe, needs some serious overhauls to accommodate some of the problems, you just stated. Limits the bandwidth the game and its servers are allowed to run at anyway. (and especially for things like Onlive) but yea I think we understand one another.

Ofcourse it'd run better, mostly just display things slightly quicker though or improve on a dipped frame rate quicker than my measly little dual-core... Still my connection allows me a 60fps in dalaran quite often, just some people seem to think the entire game revolves about their machine and not just how massively internet dependant the game is. I think there was a thread saying "WoW needs major optimisation" which is misleading, people brag "My machine is a monster and i get 12fps sometimes"... "What broadband you got?"... "I have 0.5mb broadband"... Self explanatory. If i used a killer broadband deal, killer router and one of those killer NIC PCI-e card things then it would yield much better results than pumping more POWA into my machine.

This is true, Hell with my machine in Dalaran, I got 60fps a lot actually, but when I was in a busy part moving around, looking in certain directions it would dip down to 30-35fps, (which is why I said my average fps in Dalaran was 45fps, just as a guess because its right at half way lol)

No one thing that could improve online gaming as a whole, would be completely upgrade the Networking Infrastructure these ISPs are running on. Like I stated before, because even if you have an off the chain NIC card, its still held back by the ISP and can't work to its full potential.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#20 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

I understand full well what you are saying, I have a 8-12mb down connection and a 1-2mb up, my connection is not a problem, I have a 100mb NiC (even if it was 10mb) Its mobo connection (asus m3n ht) again not the problem. Wow doesn't even use a third of the connection anyway. The only way that would be problem is the wires in my network, which are in the process of being upgraded, but that is beside the point.

I understand that it will lag because the latency between the data on the server reaching all your hardware for processing, takes longer than a single player game, that is a given, Standing still does in fact yield better frames (most of the time) but still not to 60 in the busy parts of Dalaran, sorry. especially at 4x multisampling or higher, which I would expect stating maxing the game, and its in the in game options.

I am stating that If I were to buy say a real powerful I core 7 and have it at lets say 3.8-4ghz, with lets say a gtx480, The game will play better than the rig I currently have, SO HARDWARE IS A MAJOR POINT.

Though the Infrastructure of the ISPs around most of the globe, needs some serious overhauls to accommodate some of the problems, you just stated. Limits the bandwidth the game and its servers are allowed to run at anyway. (and especially for things like Onlive) but yea I think we understand one another.

Lach0121

Ofcourse it'd run better, mostly just display things slightly quicker though or improve on a dipped frame rate quicker than my measly little dual-core... Still my connection allows me a 60fps in dalaran quite often, just some people seem to think the entire game revolves about their machine and not just how massively internet dependant the game is. I think there was a thread saying "WoW needs major optimisation" which is misleading, people brag "My machine is a monster and i get 12fps sometimes"... "What broadband you got?"... "I have 0.5mb broadband"... Self explanatory. If i used a killer broadband deal, killer router and one of those killer NIC PCI-e card things then it would yield much better results than pumping more POWA into my machine.

This is true, Hell with my machine in Dalaran, I got 60fps a lot actually, but when I was in a busy part moving around, looking in certain directions it would dip down to 30-35fps, (which is why I said my average fps in Dalaran was 45fps, just as a guess because its right at half way lol)

No one thing that could improve online gaming as a whole, would be completely upgrade the Networking Infrastructure these ISPs are running on. Like I stated before, because even if you have an off the chain NIC card, its still held back by the ISP and can't work to its full potential.

Yep. Protocols and all... TCP/IP is hellofa inefficient.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

amd phenom II 945 4 gigs of ram, dual 8800gt in SLI, and in Dalaran I get around 45, down to about 30 as a minimum.. (at 1680x1050)

So in no way, shape,or form is a a e8400 and a single 9600gt gonna max out Wow, at constant 60fps. (anywhere near the same resolution)

JohnF111

1440x900 for me :) And your system means nothing when running wow as its as previously said, server data being transferred... the game and graphics itself are simple as hell... Depends on your connection how laggy it is. I got 20mb broadband so i get all the laggy data fairly quickly, means i don't get as much lag... i can sit in wow with 60fps fairly easily, just if i run around a lot or hearthstone and use portals then obviously its gonna lag and drop my fps cos my NIC is trying to collect data and cant do **** before it has that data.... You see everyone's weapons and armour has to be downloaded from the servers, your internet connection depends on this to happen, all their armour, weapons, stats, abilites, talents, mounts, buffs and enchants are all stored on blizzard's servers and when you see a person(or 100) it all comes via the Network Interface Card, then your NIC sends this data to the GPU if it's an image to be rendered or your CPU if its data to displayed or executions to be carried out... Do you see where i'm headin with this? Without the data your cpu(or gpu) is basically waiting for it... which means you get lag and frame rate drops...

I've played WoW on ATT DSL and Comcast cable. Very minor differences. I play it on Ultra at a very high resolution. I've tried dropping it down to 1080p or even 720p and the differences are also minor. I've just accepted the fact that WoW's engine only goes so far with taking advantage of more-powerful hardware. It's old and outdated and very rarely is it updated. That's why I'm hoping Cataclysm plays better since it is the only expansion with a real overhaul and redesign, and I'll have a DX11 card to take advantage of whatever effects they decide to put in.

Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

[QUOTE="kaitanuvax"]

MMORPGs eat CPUs alive, you'd need a quad core to run it well in heavily populated situations (raids, pvp fight)

ionusX

bah your claim makes me laugh :P

dual core's over 2.8ghz handle it VERY well.. do go calling 4 core without the benches to proove it..

You've just contradicted everybody else in this topic by saying dual cores handle it very well.

But, after doing a little researching, I've found that quad cores don't help WoW at all since it isn't optimized to use it. So in the end, you WoWers are screwed...

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="kaitanuvax"]

MMORPGs eat CPUs alive, you'd need a quad core to run it well in heavily populated situations (raids, pvp fight)

kaitanuvax

bah your claim makes me laugh :P

dual core's over 2.8ghz handle it VERY well.. do go calling 4 core without the benches to proove it..

You've just contradicted everybody else in this topic by saying dual cores handle it very well.

But, after doing a little researching, I've found that quad cores don't help WoW at all since it isn't optimized to use it. So in the end, you WoWers are screwed...

you can add in quad core support yourself, the same way you can add in dx11 support yourself.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

ive played WoW with a 2 core and raided before at highest settings (force aa and af via CCC).. with my 5830 before.. and if it wasnt for the requirement of spending money to reopen my elemental shaman again i WOULD HAPPILY go and do it again to show you what kind of preformance i get in high requirement area's..

this would also require me digging my core 2 duo e7400 2.8ghz out of its box and replacing my cpu.. neither of which im willing to do to proove a point..

i was doing toc-25 man with 65+ fps (no overclock) in toc 25 man maxed out (aa x16, af x8 ) at 1440 x 900 (my 19")and then again at 720p (my 32")

and it rarely dipped below 45.

the only time i ever had to turn my settings down was at the opening of icc day where everyone and their cousin was in one place.. an entire server of people will drive anyone's system under...

good thing this rarely ever happen.

and i do mean EVERYONE was there..

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

ive played WoW with a 2 core and raided before at highest settings (force aa and af via CCC).. with my 5830 before.. and if it wasnt for the requirement of spending money to reopen my elemental shaman again i WOULD HAPPILY go and do it again to show you what kind of preformance i get in high requirement area's..

this would also require me digging my core 2 duo e7400 2.8ghz out of its box and replacing my cpu.. neither of which im willing to do to proove a point..

i was doing toc-25 man with 65+ fps (no overclock) in toc 25 man maxed out (aa x16, af x8 ) at 1440 x 900 (my 19")and then again at 720p (my 32")

and it rarely dipped below 45.

the only time i ever had to turn my settings down was at the opening of icc day where everyone and their cousin was in one place.. an entire server of people will drive anyone's system under...

good thing this rarely ever happen.

and i do mean EVERYONE was there..

ionusX

I have a feeling all of the people who are claiming "hurr hurr can't be done" are running systems that have over 9000 things running in the backround, full of keyloggers and spyware and addware.

I have an athlon 64 II 240 and a radeon hd 4650 and it runs in dalaran at about 40 fps and that is an awful setup.

I used to play wow with a sempron 2700+, 1gig pc 2700 and a radeon 9600 pro.

Wow is not that demanding.

Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
My gf plays WoW on her netbook and its playable, just not very good, like 5-15fps lol I couldnt play with that but she does. When I started wow I think i had a amd 3200+ and a geforce 6800(its been awhile i think that was it) and it ran great.
Avatar image for whitey_rolls
whitey_rolls

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 whitey_rolls
Member since 2006 • 2547 Posts

WoW runs perfectly fine for the most part with my E8400 and Nvidia 8800GT but as it's been said you can't max the game out which I"m fine with.

But with the original posters rig he's looking at he won't be able to raid. In fights like Sartharion with all the whelps and lava waves he'd DC for sure (at least on 25 man) ...

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

WoW runs perfectly fine for the most part with my E8400 and Nvidia 8800GT but as it's been said you can't max the game out which I"m fine with.

But with the original posters rig he's looking at he won't be able to raid. In fights like Sartharion with all the whelps and lava waves he'd DC for sure (at least on 25 man) ...

whitey_rolls

The sartharion fight is less than 60 seconds now.

Avatar image for rohnzzz
rohnzzz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 rohnzzz
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

My girlfriend is addicted to WoW. And ATM I have just one computer. She's always using my computer to "check in" :/ What I'm wanting to do is get a second system on the cheap.

This AMD MB+Sempron looks like a pretty good steal at $20 shipped. Especially since I already have a spare case, PSU, 2gigs of RAM and a GeForce6 for it.

Will this cut it, or am I going to need to get something in the 775, Pentium D range?

WindWalkerX

That could work because you have a 2Gb RAM and a GeForce 6 in it. That two is enough for WoW to work properly on your pc...;)