CPU performance rated 6.30 ???

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mystery323x
mystery323x

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#1 mystery323x
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts

This is what System Labs rates my CPU-

Minimum: 2.4 GHz You Have: 2.21 GHz Performance Rated at 6.30 GHz

can that be right>?

Avatar image for mystery323x
mystery323x

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#2 mystery323x
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts
Isnt this way to high?
Avatar image for 669594
669594

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 669594
Member since 2005 • 66 Posts

you have an AMD Phenom X3 8450 right ?

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#4 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I only rated like a 5.3. You can check out what I have in my sig. I don't pay attention to these numbers. As long as my PC performs like it's suppose to, I could care less really.
Avatar image for TerroRizing
TerroRizing

3210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TerroRizing
Member since 2007 • 3210 Posts

I only rated like a 5.3. You can check out what I have in my sig. I don't pay attention to these numbers. As long as my PC performs like it's suppose to, I could care less really.Elann2008

I think he means the speed, not the vista rating.

Avatar image for mystery323x
mystery323x

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 mystery323x
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts
I have a AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ , Thats what it says in System. Its a little old maybe 3 years
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#7 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I only rated like a 5.3. You can check out what I have in my sig. I don't pay attention to these numbers. As long as my PC performs like it's suppose to, I could care less really.TerroRizing

I think he means the speed, not the vista rating.

I apologize. I need to go retake my English courses now. It's early and I did not have my coffee. Heh heh. :P Have you tried using other programs to check if it rates it normally? I wouldn't trust just one source. For example, I use one website to check how much power I needed for my PC, it it came out to be an extremely low number.. when I have a really beefy rig. I wouldn't count on system labs.

No, it's not right.

Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#8 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts
Elann2008 on gamespot without cofee.. RUN!!! he is crazy lol j/k but anyway For modern gaming it pretty slow rig you got for recent gaming
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#9 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Elann2008 on gamespot without cofee.. RUN!!! he is crazy lol j/k but anyway For modern gaming it pretty slow rig you got for recent gamingmarcthpro

I feel a hijacked thread coming. No jk.

Ever thought about overclocking your CPU?

Avatar image for erikgergal
erikgergal

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 erikgergal
Member since 2006 • 902 Posts
that system requirements lab site isnt very accurate. when they put the score for the speed on my dual-core processor they rated it at 4.2ghz and i only have a 2ghz processor. as someone said above dont use the requirements lab.
Avatar image for threepac81
threepac81

3459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 threepac81
Member since 2003 • 3459 Posts

that system requirements lab site isnt very accurate. when they put the score for the speed on my dual-core processor they rated it at 4.2ghz and i only have a 2ghz processor. as someone said above dont use the requirements lab.erikgergal

Well it seems obvious to me that they were tyring to compare old processors as far back as the 90s, to more modern processors. In other words: They will rate a Pentium III 3.0Ghz as a Rating of 3.0 GHz. A Core 2 can be rated as anywhere from 5.0Ghz to 7.0Ghz.

Give them a break there just trying to make it easier to understand, espesially to those people that need it the most.

Avatar image for erikgergal
erikgergal

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 erikgergal
Member since 2006 • 902 Posts

[QUOTE="erikgergal"]that system requirements lab site isnt very accurate. when they put the score for the speed on my dual-core processor they rated it at 4.2ghz and i only have a 2ghz processor. as someone said above dont use the requirements lab.threepac81

Well it seems obvious to me that they were tyring to compare old processors as far back as the 90s, to more modern processors. In other words: They will rate a Pentium III 3.0Ghz as a Rating of 3.0 GHz. A Core 2 can be rated as anywhere from 5.0Ghz to 7.0Ghz.

Give them a break there just trying to make it easier to understand, espesially to those people that need it the most.

fine fine i will give them a break. i guess youre right though with all the different models of processors that have come out it must be hard to keep a standard going.