Crysis - Low-end test

Ok I'm back with another lowend test to help some gamers with low-end PC's run the latest games, the moral of this system is that system requirements can stretch the truth, and systemrequirementslab.com can be WAY off. This time I tested Crysis, and the results, well, just take a look...

TEST SYSTEM SPECS:

Intel Celeron 2.2 GHZ

nVidia 6200 OC 256MB

2 gigs of factory ram

CRYSIS:

Ok, the game ran, well let's just say, amazingly well. Besides the cutscenes, the game ran at full speed, I don't know exactly what it is, I think 60fps, with a some slowdown on the cutscenes, and a few times during firefights.

SETTINGS USED:

Screen Resolution - 800x600, and 1024x768

Of course, all graphics settings were on low, at 800x600, the game ran at full speed. At 1024x768 with the same settings, the speed dropped by 30%-50%.

With all graphics settings on high, the game ran at a measly 15 fps, but it looked nice, yet with the crappy card, a lot of textures didn't show up, which I thought was very interesting. The texture on the rocks went away, and it gave the game this "unfinished" look.

No one interested?

high settings 15 fps?is this a joke?darx55

My 6600 ran Crysis perfeclty on low even though it's not supposed to. But suprisingly, Crysis looks like S**T on low sets...absolutely terrible.

a 6200's frame on high settings are much more worse than a 4870's frame. Even on high I don't think you are getting the best visuals available on dx9. OR you really are a genius of Overclocking.