crysis warhead VS Call of Juarez

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for split-moment
split-moment

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 split-moment
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts

which have the most impresive graphics ??

to easy things up i took thouse screenshots (sorry for warhead fans becouse i didn't take much care when i took it's screen shots)

call of juarez bound in blood

crysis warhead

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
i think call of juarez has a little bit cell shading in it
Avatar image for GenTom
GenTom

5945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#3 GenTom
Member since 2005 • 5945 Posts
Well having finished both. Yes Juarez has some nice models but overall Crysis is FAR better looking. The relatively small levels of Juarez, frequent texture pop-in and pretty same-y area's.. yeah, Crysis is superior.
Avatar image for Adversary16
Adversary16

1705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 Adversary16
Member since 2007 • 1705 Posts
Both, actually.
Avatar image for split-moment
split-moment

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 split-moment
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts

Well having finished both. Yes Juarez has some nice models but overall Crysis is FAR better looking. The relatively small levels of Juarez, frequent texture pop-in and pretty same-y area's.. yeah, Crysis is superior.GenTom

yes that's what i was thinking , crysis is a winner by neture it's far better graphic wise let alone other aspects like the dynamic game play and other stuff

Avatar image for mrferrari_basic
mrferrari_basic

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mrferrari_basic
Member since 2002 • 341 Posts
Both are quality games. It all boils down to what the user likes among the main areas that separate the two. If you're even a mild fan of spaghetti westerns of old that Clint Eastwood made famous, you need to get CoJ2. If you prefer more modern/sci-fi shooters Warhead is it. I'd play both if I were you.
Avatar image for Pessu
Pessu

944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Pessu
Member since 2007 • 944 Posts
Crysis is a much better looking game. Theres no competition.
Avatar image for 555SSOO
555SSOO

1873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 137

User Lists: 0

#8 555SSOO
Member since 2008 • 1873 Posts

Crysis is a much better looking game. Theres no competition.Pessu

yep

Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts
You really can't compare the two, so I'm going to go with Crysis & Crysis Warhead as having the best graphics. Just from looking at the screenshots of the two, but I haven't played (COJ) so I'm only going off of the screenshots, but I will make a final decision once I get Call of Juarez.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts

I still think Crysis looks better, but I admit CoJ looks great as well. There are other considerations other than looks alone, though. Having not played CoJ2, can someone answer these for me?

1) Does CoJ have fully destructible buildings/trees/objects?

2) How big are the levels in comparison between the two? (ie draw distance, actual level size, ect)

3) Does CoJ have advanced physics?

4) Does CoJ have advanced effects like motion blur, depth of field, heat effects, and advanced particle effects?

5) What kind of AI does CoJ have?

To me part of the reason Crysis is such a technical marval is not only it's great looks, but the nuts and bolts within too. For a game that looks as good as Crysis it also utilizes some very advanced technologies. Most games either are advanced in the graphics department but lack in others (like Call of Duty 4).

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
the ai is good
Avatar image for Perhampus
Perhampus

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Perhampus
Member since 2008 • 231 Posts

Crysis I'd say looks better and feels better

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#13 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I've played both games all the way through and Crysis looks better.

Avatar image for split-moment
split-moment

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 split-moment
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts

I still think Crysis looks better, but I admit CoJ looks great as well. There are other considerations other than looks alone, though. Having not played CoJ2, can someone answer these for me?

1) Does CoJ have fully destructible buildings/trees/objects?

2) How big are the levels in comparison between the two? (ie draw distance, actual level size, ect)

3) Does CoJ have advanced physics?

4) Does CoJ have advanced effects like motion blur, depth of field, heat effects, and advanced particle effects?

5) What kind of AI does CoJ have?

To me part of the reason Crysis is such a technical marval is not only it's great looks, but the nuts and bolts within too. For a game that looks as good as Crysis it also utilizes some very advanced technologies. Most games either are advanced in the graphics department but lack in others (like Call of Duty 4).

dnuggs40

1)no

2)crysis have bigger levels , bigger drawing distance

3)no

4)coj have good blur effects and othe effects ,,, but cysis have more and better effects

5) the AI of coj is good ,,, but not as dynamic and excaiting as crysis

no wonder crysis always a winner

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#15 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
At least the ai in coj is believable, the ai in crysis behaves....weird.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
Crysis no doubt,,
Avatar image for split-moment
split-moment

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 split-moment
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts

At least the ai in coj is believable, the ai in crysis behaves....weird.dakan45

what !!! crysis AI is one of the best i ever saw , to the point where i don't think about the AI when i'm playing crysis , i just think about the enemys as real people , this is how great the AI in crysis !!!!!!! , while in other games i just learn the AI of the enemys and then predict thier every move

Avatar image for neo8888
neo8888

336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 neo8888
Member since 2008 • 336 Posts

Crysis is a much better looking game. Theres no competition.Pessu

I agree

Avatar image for claytoma
claytoma

1508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 claytoma
Member since 2002 • 1508 Posts

From the looks of the posted pictures, I say Call of Juarez. Crysis has some absolutely amazing textures, but the overall graphical style is uninspired.

Avatar image for LithuanianGamer
LithuanianGamer

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 LithuanianGamer
Member since 2009 • 2997 Posts

Crysis I don`t know just like it maybe because I can say to my friends my pc can run it.Yours can`t get a new one loser.

Avatar image for spotyou
spotyou

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 spotyou
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

Very important thing, CoJ:BIB is 2~3 times better performance than Crysis & Warhead. COJ:BIB is very very optimized. Crysis & Warhead are not. Top graphics, but poor performance.

Avatar image for Volatility
Volatility

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 63

User Lists: 0

#22 Volatility
Member since 2009 • 239 Posts

even if crysis warhead has better graphics, the winner is coj bib for me :D

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#23 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Crysis by a long shot.

Avatar image for Nitrous2O
Nitrous2O

1813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Nitrous2O
Member since 2004 • 1813 Posts

I briefly started a game of COJ: BiB, so I certainly haven't seen all it has to offer, but I'd have to give the visuals to C-Dub.

The style changed slightly, and some people may prefer Crysis original over Warhead, however, Warhead is still extremely gorgeous.

Avatar image for spotyou
spotyou

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 spotyou
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts




:P

Avatar image for TerroRizing
TerroRizing

3210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 TerroRizing
Member since 2007 • 3210 Posts

call of juarez runs so much better, but optimization aside crysis warhead looks quite a bit better.

Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#27 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts

call of juarez runs so much better, but optimization aside crysis warhead looks quite a bit better.

TerroRizing
Crysis looks a lot better than COJ BiB, texture poppin' while in the free roam is unnaceptable, it really puts down the experience, but Chrome Engine is really beautiful, nice lightning effects. About Crysis AI, it got better in the second game, because on the first one, that thing cheated on me.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Very important thing, CoJ:BIB is 2~3 times better performance than Crysis & Warhead. COJ:BIB is very very optimized. Crysis & Warhead are not. Top graphics, but poor performance.

spotyou
Don't compare Cry Engine 2 with Unreal Engine 3 >_>. Crysis doesn't look better, it looks MUCH better than CoJ, just look at anything except the character models and compare it to Crysis, not screenshots, compare them yourself. It makes me puke how random it is, quality wise, literally, it's by far the most extreme UE3 game, in a bad way, there are extremely good things like the models and a few textures, but there are also extremely bad things, the abnormal use of blur (no it doesn't make it look better, I usually like blur, but this is far above my standards), most textures, the movement feels weird also the game is too static, lots of things happen (like many enemies) but at the same time nothing happens (other than you, allies, enemies, the game is dead).
Avatar image for Volatility
Volatility

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 63

User Lists: 0

#29 Volatility
Member since 2009 • 239 Posts

[QUOTE="spotyou"]

Very important thing, CoJ:BIB is 2~3 times better performance than Crysis & Warhead. COJ:BIB is very very optimized. Crysis & Warhead are not. Top graphics, but poor performance.

DanielDust

Don't compare Cry Engine 2 with Unreal Engine 3 >_>. Crysis doesn't look better, it looks MUCH better than CoJ, just look at anything except the character models and compare it to Crysis, not screenshots, compare them yourself. It makes me puke how random it is, quality wise, literally, it's by far the most extreme UE3 game, in a bad way, there are extremely good things like the models and a few textures, but there are also extremely bad things, the abnormal use of blur (no it doesn't make it look better, I usually like blur, but this is far above my standards), most textures, the movement feels weird also the game is too static, lots of things happen (like many enemies) but at the same time nothing happens (other than you, allies, enemies, the game is dead).

Bro but CoJ: Bound in Blood uses the Chrome engine 4 :?

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="spotyou"]

Very important thing, CoJ:BIB is 2~3 times better performance than Crysis & Warhead. COJ:BIB is very very optimized. Crysis & Warhead are not. Top graphics, but poor performance.

Volatility

Don't compare Cry Engine 2 with Unreal Engine 3 >_>. Crysis doesn't look better, it looks MUCH better than CoJ, just look at anything except the character models and compare it to Crysis, not screenshots, compare them yourself. It makes me puke how random it is, quality wise, literally, it's by far the most extreme UE3 game, in a bad way, there are extremely good things like the models and a few textures, but there are also extremely bad things, the abnormal use of blur (no it doesn't make it look better, I usually like blur, but this is far above my standards), most textures, the movement feels weird also the game is too static, lots of things happen (like many enemies) but at the same time nothing happens (other than you, allies, enemies, the game is dead).

Bro but CoJ: Bound in Blood uses the Chrome engine 4 :?

Good to know then :P I thought it was UE 3 since it's exactly like it and suffers from the same problems. Thanks, I'll avoid this engine, since even UE 3 is hard to put up with, after so many games that use it. We don't need another engine like it.

Avatar image for modernwarfare3
modernwarfare3

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 modernwarfare3
Member since 2009 • 192 Posts
both of them have good graphics