I don't know, personally I find some of the statements from you lot much more annoying than anything Crytek has said. If you don't like the game or don't like the types of games they develop, that's understandable and totally fair enough -- everyone is different in that regard ;)
However, something I don't understand is how is it even possible to be offended by what Crytek has stated? If you didn't pirate the game and instead bought it, or if you chose to not buy the game, then guys ---- they are not talking about you!
The only people that should feel the finger is being pointed themselves are the pirates. Even at the most fundamental level, maybe Crytek is right, maybe they are wrong, but how exactly is any blame being placed on piracy directed at you in the slightest? Maybe you could help me out on that one, and I'm not trying to be an jerk by saying that. Otherwise, I really can't sympathize with you even if I'd like to.
If you want to be "offended" by piracy accusations, how about laying some blame on a company like EA, with their draconian DRM protection on a game like Mass Effect (3 total allowed installs), which has taken away some of the rights of legitimate customers all in the name of --- you'll like this --- combating piracy. Now here's something real and tangible with direct consequences on us gamers, today.
Yeah, believe it or not, from industry's perspective in general, there's an unfavorable view of piracy. I'm sure if you asked Valve and Stardock if they'd prefer a world where their games are not pirated, they would answer yes (duh). However, they aren't outspoken about that at all, and we all commend them for it.
There are plenty others to take their place though: Chris Taylor of Gas Powered Games says piracy has forced his hand to attempt to shoehorn RTS games in consoles, id and Epic have stated piracy is why they are turning to consoles, Iron Lore believes piracy is factor in which forced the studio to close, Infinity Ward says piracy on the PC is astounding and it's no wonder people don't make PC-only games any longer. Once again though, any piracy accusations have nothing to do with you.
And here we have Crytek, which by the nature of the types of games they prefer to make (technologically advanced), would prefer to remain PC-exclusive. However, if the level of sales on their next game aren't indicatively high enough to justify a follow-up game in the same vein, then they are going to be financially responsible and not take on another such venture. Who else is making the types of games they do and is remaining PC-exclusive?
By the way, if you'd like vilify Crytek for their stance on piracy, at least don't put your own words in their mouth. First, they aren't suggesting Crysis sold poorly, where has that been stated by Crytek? In fact, it must have been enough for them to even try another PC-exclusive release.
Also, even though the piracy levels witnessed with Crysis is 15:1 or 20:1, never did they mention anything about a pirated copy equating to a lost sale. In reality, in the same article quoted by the OP, they were thinking more along the lines of if piracy could somehow be reduced to a certain level, they could potentially double their sales -- which would have a drastic impact on them.
Log in to comment