CS:GO out nearly 1 month and last in rankings every single day.

Counter-Strike Current 11,649 - Peak 52,538

Counter-Strike: Source 7,884 - Peak 37,688

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Current 7,578 - Peak 22,890

Even the casuals and noobs know CS:GO is horrid. Valve's attempt to pocket some money. Worked, but the game flopped hard. Glad I didn't spend a cent on this junk. It's embarassing that it even has "Counter-Strike" in the title.

The game should just be renamed Offensive, because it is.

Sames as most of ur posts....ranked last every single day.FelipeInside

stop posting. Leave your cave and look at the sunlight

stop posting. Leave your cave and look at the sunlight

wis3boi

Please stop posting, and stop blaming the game because your crap at it, since you cant get used to the changes.

Please stop posting, and stop blaming the game because your crap at it, since you cant get used to the changes.

ultimate-k

Can you expand as to why the game is horrid, or is playerbase size your sole argument? Is Angry Birds the immaculate gaming sensation of our generation? Do you amuse yourself in the act of chronic regurgitation?

As soon as I saw the title I thought "Gotta be a jake or Skaredo thread" :P

Can you expand as to why the game is horrid, or is playerbase size your sole argument? Is Angry Birds the immaculate gaming sensation of our generation? Do you amuse yourself in the act of chronic regurgitation?

Socijalisticka

He acts like an 8 year old boy when asked that question, and then says herp derp its for noobs, he dosn't have an augument.

Please stop posting, and stop blaming the game because your crap at it, since you cant get used to the changes.

ultimate-k

$100 USD 1v1. I'll double it if I lose. Pick a partner from this thread 2v1 if you like.

And then wants people to have a $100 bet to see if he wins by pay pal, then when people obviosly dont want to do it, he goes herp derp your casual. You never explained any legitament points to why CS:GO is a bad game, other than herp derp its for causals/noobs.

And then wants people to have a $100 bet to see if he wins by pay pal, then when people obviosly dont want to do it, he goes herp derp your casual. You never explained any legitament points to why CS:GO is a bad game, other than herp derp its for causals/noobs.

ultimate-k

It's not my fault you fail at reading kid. I posted in multiple topics and anyone who knows CS agrees GO is terrible.

You call me bad but won't 1v1. Np you're bad and scared. get ownt chump.

GO is for scrubs.

[QUOTE="ultimate-k"]

And then wants people to have a $100 bet to see if he wins by pay pal, then when people obviosly dont want to do it, he goes herp derp your casual. You never explained any legitament points to why CS:GO is a bad game, other than herp derp its for causals/noobs.

jakes456

It's not my fault you fail at reading kid. I posted in multiple topics and anyone who knows CS agrees GO is terrible.

You call me bad but won't 1v1. Np you're bad and scared. get ownt chump.

GO is for scrubs.

Got owned, because you said so LMAO. Iv seen your post in multiple topics and they the same thing, herp derp CS:GO is for causals. You are the one who is getting owned badly in this thread, every one is laughing at you.

Counter Strike is such a crappy game. Valve needs to just breakup, they are such bad devs. I hate all PC games. Why am I even gaming? Sound familiar? IxX3xil3d0n3XxI

Describes OP very well, cs:go is made by hidden path not Valve :\ which is why cs go is so weak.

Counter-Strike Current 11,649 - Peak 52,538

Counter-Strike: Source 7,884 - Peak 37,688

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Current 7,578 - Peak 22,890

Even the casuals and noobs know CS:GO is horrid. Valve's attempt to pocket some money. Worked, but the game flopped hard. Glad I didn't spend a cent on this junk. It's embarassing that it even has "Counter-Strike" in the title.

The game should just be renamed Offensive, because it is.

jakes456

IrregardlessKHAndAnime

A baby just died thanks to you.

.

They said the same thing about Counter Strike Source when it came out, eventually though people started to get used to it and it got better as Valve patched it with the feedback they got from players. The same will happen to Global Offensive.Treflis

[QUOTE="Treflis"]They said the same thing about Counter Strike Source when it came out, eventually though people started to get used to it and it got better as Valve patched it with the feedback they got from players. The same will happen to Global Offensive.SKaREO

[QUOTE="SKaREO"][QUOTE="Treflis"]They said the same thing about Counter Strike Source when it came out, eventually though people started to get used to it and it got better as Valve patched it with the feedback they got from players. The same will happen to Global Offensive.alan_carter

Gamespot needs a vote system, if a member is a complete idiot and we vote his thread as "Bad" then eventually he is disallowed to create threads, if a thread is voting "Good" then the person gets a small amount of points which increase their level a little bit. Assuming of course it doesn't result in the website breaking.JohnF111

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]Gamespot needs a vote system, if a member is a complete idiot and we vote his thread as "Bad" then eventually he is disallowed to create threads, if a thread is voting "Good" then the person gets a small amount of points which increase their level a little bit. Assuming of course it doesn't result in the website breaking.FelipeInside

Ok well maybe it shouldn't be "like" and "dislike" but maybe just a number to indicate how good a thread is, if it's a negative then the number is bright red as a warning to stay out and avoid the troll, sort of like the spoiler tags, you know it's there and then you get to decide if you want to look. A positive number could be bright green to indicate a "Good" thread.

That way it's not turning it into a social site but still provides indication of a good quality thread.

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]Gamespot needs a vote system, if a member is a complete idiot and we vote his thread as "Bad" then eventually he is disallowed to create threads, if a thread is voting "Good" then the person gets a small amount of points which increase their level a little bit. Assuming of course it doesn't result in the website breaking.FelipeInside

GS really needs to kick out the current tech team, and bring in a new team to revamp the forums with new system.FelipeInside

Its posters like the TC, and a few others, like one recently posting in this thread lol... As well as one who creates threads for ego stroking, are why I haven't been here in these forums lately.

The forums have gotten worse, mainly because of ^^ in my first sentence.

I will only scan for useful info. Lol which is becoming less, and less in ratio to the BS you have to suffle through.

Its posters like the TC, and a few others, like one recently posting in this thread lol... As well as one who creates threads for ego stroking, are why I haven't been here in these forums lately.

The forums have gotten worse, mainly because of ^^ in my first sentence.

I will only scan for useful info. Lol which is becoming less, and less in ratio to the BS you have to suffle through.

Lach0121

sounds like real life

Its probably because they should have done more advertising. Though I dont believe TF2 was a smash hit til after it released. I think. What IS the consensus on the game? I hear its just average. Gamesterpheonix

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="JohnF111"]Gamespot needs a vote system, if a member is a complete idiot and we vote his thread as "Bad" then eventually he is disallowed to create threads, if a thread is voting "Good" then the person gets a small amount of points which increase their level a little bit. Assuming of course it doesn't result in the website breaking.spittis

about voting people off

no

i'd get thrown out

people too jelly of my shaft

qq

[QUOTE="spittis"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] I put forward this idea to the GS staff a few months ago, together with a like/dislike button for comments. What did they respond? They didn't want GS to become Facebook.... Sigh.JigglyWiggly_

about voting people off

no

i'd get thrown out

people too jelly of my shaft

qq

Regardless if this thread is troll thread or not, but I'm sick of source engine, literally. Can't look at it anymore.GazaAli

Why? It looks great.

CS:GO sucks as much as CS:S and CZ did, the only good thing is the 5 v 5 matchmaking which suits CS very well.

CS is the only good one tbh, just wish Valve didn't leave it for dead because it's far better than the Source Engine games, which Source is a horrible engine with a poor netcode. The reason why CZ is so amazing is because it's based on the Quake 2 engine which those engines always were perfect for online games.

CS:GO sucks as much as CS:S and CZ did, the only good thing is the 5 v 5 matchmaking which suits CS very well.

CS is the only good one tbh, just wish Valve didn't leave it for dead because it's far better than the Source Engine games, which Source is a horrible engine with a poor netcode. The reason why CZ is so amazing is because it's based on the Quake 2 engine which those engines always were perfect for online games.

Tixylixx

[QUOTE="GazaAli"]Regardless if this thread is troll thread or not, but I'm sick of source engine, literally. Can't look at it anymore.the_bi99man

Why? It looks great.

Yeah if I didn't know any better I would think it was a whole new engine. All the new effects, better performance, and overall smoothness is great