CS:S (for noobs) or CS 1.6 (for pro's and cheaters, course they have no idea how to play) In the end it's not about the graphics at all, it's all about the game play. BF2 you don't really have any control of the game. You just run around, shoot and die. If you are more into death-match, then you should play Quake 4 instead. In CS:S you can kill much more easer, than you think. The only thing with both CS versions, you have to know the map: every corner, every wall, every brick, before you can really get a feel of the game. It's not about how many shuts you take, it's all about taking one (or two) perfect shut to take your opponent down. CS has also a warcraft3mod, that I love the most, but I get banned a lot when I play Undead.
[QUOTE="max5633"]which worth to buy ??? i wan some game can let me play for 4 years =.= BF2 gets boring faster than CS. I've played CS for 7.5 years and I quit playing BF2 pretty much right after I got it. I like first person shooters and BF2 relies on vehicles way too much. A level playing field is more fun than getting raped by tanks.
Battlefield 2 is fun, if you have friends to play it with, a nice computer, and a small 32 player server. (I think the 64 player levels are almost too big, if you don't have a vehicle, it takes FOREVER to walk across a map. CS:Source is very pick-up and play. Â
BF2 rules imho, if played properly by all players its simply awsome, if your team has enough good squads who listen to your commander it can be brilliant fun, as for too many vehicles, there is plenty of anti vehicle weaponry, I love this game.
Log in to comment