[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"][QUOTE="subrosian"]You want 4 GB of memory at least. Having just 2GB is silly. You also should consider going with a Core i5 960 over a Phenom II as its performance is unquestionably better. The 950 / 960 are the sweet spot. As far as GPUs go, you can ge an HD 5770 for only slightly more than an HD 5750, and it's worth the boost if you're not going crossfire. There's also the GTX 460 to consider, but you would need to increase your budget. subrosian
First of all, there's no such thing as a Core i5 950 or 960. There is a Core i5 750 and a 760, or a Core i7 950 or 960. While the Core i5 quad-cores are faster than the Phenom II's, it's not a significant enough gap for most people to even care, especially for a gaming machine. When you look over someone's build, you should try to get an idea of where they're headed based on the parts they choose. Someone who chooses these parts looks (to me) like they're going for price/performance on a slim to moderate budget. Switching to an intel-based platform isn't the smartest move for this type of a build. Please, be a bit more observant and accurate when trying to help people.
1. It's a typo 2. The i5 platform is SIGNIFICANTLY better for the money than the Phenom II platform. It's a terrible idea to invest in a Phenom II at the moment, especially if you're buying DDR2 memory to do it (i.e. outdated RAM, less of an upgrade path). And no, that's not just for "high end" gaming, titles like Starcraft II show marked improvements on the i5 over the Phenom II. 3. The cost is the same, there's absolutely no need for a knee-jerk AMD response. Intel has the superior processor on the market right now. Matched with an HD 5770 or GTX 460 (depending on GPU price point) it's ideal for almost any gamer. There's no sense ignoring the sweet spots, or you wind up spending more money in the long run to game.So because Starcraft 2 runs better on i5's and i7's than on Phenom II"s, the OP should definitely base their decision off that? That's absurd. Unless that's the only game that the OP wants to play, that's ridiculous. Even if that were their main purpose, it might not be a good reason to spend the extra cash. IDK about you, but once I get over 30fps in a strategy game, I'm happy. You can more than fulfill that need with a Phenom II. Most games don't show anywhere near that amount of difference between gaming with an i5/i7 and a Phenom II x4.
How is it a horrible time to invest in an AMD AM3/Phenom II platform? Please explain that logic. You can get a 955 or 965 BE and an AM3 motherboard (that uses DDR3 RAM, like AM3 boards do, not AM2+) for $210-$220. Clearly it's a less expensive platform to build on. IMO, the "sweet spot" for any gamer depends on their budget. Right now an AM3/Phenom II X4/DDR3 platform is less expensive than an i5/LGA 1156 platform, while stil delivering most of the performance. I'll agree with you on the GTX 460.. I think getting either a single GTX 460, or 2 in SLI is the best solution for almost anybody who can spend at least $170 on a GPU.
http://www.techspot.com/review/305-starcraft2-performance/page13.html
As for Starcraft 2, the above link will show you that the difference between a stock i5 750 and stock 965 BE isn't all that big.. even in this game that seems to love intel processors more than most.
Log in to comment