Dawn of War II or Civilization IV Complete on Steam?

I was going to get Civilization IV The Complete Edition on Steam (Civ IV, Warlords, Beyond the Sword, and Colonization) but then Dawn of War II got a 50 percent off thing. Which one should I get (They are both 20 dollars)?

DAWN OF WAR II.

Best RTS I've ever played...Although...If you're more into base building than action it's probably not the game for you.

Get both if you can. :P
If you had to choose one get Civ 4. Its the King of Turn Based Strategy.

Get both if you can. :P
If you had to choose one get Civ 4. Its the King of Turn Based Strategy.

pvtdonut54

Gal Civ 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civ 4

[QUOTE="pvtdonut54"]

Get both if you can. :P
If you had to choose one get Civ 4. Its the King of Turn Based Strategy.

foossilo

Gal Civ 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civ 4

Pure lies. Stop living in the past.

And Civ 4>Dawn of War 2 IMO.

[QUOTE="foossilo"]

[QUOTE="pvtdonut54"]

Get both if you can. :P
If you had to choose one get Civ 4. Its the King of Turn Based Strategy.

ice144

Gal Civ 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civ 4

Pure lies. Stop living in the past.

And Civ 4>Dawn of War 2 IMO.

Stop living in the past? LOL

Gal Civ 2 w/ expansions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civ 4 w/ expansions

Most people just say Civ 4 because that is the only one that have played or actually spent some time with.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/galacticcivilizations2twilightofthearnor?q=twilight%20of%20arnor

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/galacticcivilizations2darkavatar?q=dark%20avatar

versus

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/sidmeierscivilization4colonization?q=colonization

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/civilization4beyondthesword?q=civilization%20IV

Civilization IV - Complete

Civ4. Dawn of War is good, but Civ is the pinnacle of strategy games.

Civilization IV, definitely

Civ 4 definitely. DoW2 was mediocre at best.kieranb2000

wrong, you just dont know how to play

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"]Civ 4 definitely. DoW2 was mediocre at best.ag3ntz3rox0x

wrong, you just dont know how to play

[QUOTE="ag3ntz3rox0x"]

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"]Civ 4 definitely. DoW2 was mediocre at best.kieranb2000

wrong, you just dont know how to play

takes skill. not just tank rush like other rts

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"][QUOTE="ag3ntz3rox0x"]

wrong, you just dont know how to play

ag3ntz3rox0x

takes skill. not just tank rush like other rts

[QUOTE="ag3ntz3rox0x"]

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"]Civ 4 definitely. DoW2 was mediocre at best.kieranb2000

wrong, you just dont know how to play

I don't think that when he meant that the game was not deep he was talking about the lore. Anyways while I have not played the game for some time at the start it did not appear to have as large of a skill component as say starcraft nor did it have as good of a strategy component as Supreme Commander.

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"][QUOTE="ag3ntz3rox0x"]

wrong, you just dont know how to play

ag3ntz3rox0x

takes skill. not just tank rush like other rts

well do you feel like some Turn based stratergy or some real time tactical?

i would get dow2, the competitive multiplayer is fantastic and the last stand is great fun, theres also a fun campaign in there as well

i could never finish a game of civ 4

I admit that I haven't played DOW2, but Civ 4 is amazing!

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"][QUOTE="ag3ntz3rox0x"]

wrong, you just dont know how to play

MorbidToaster

Civ 4 will give you more bang for your buck by far. Not saying Dawn of War 2 isn't good, however. DoW 2 is really fun in online multiplayer and the people are pretty nice. You'll get more mileage out of Civ 4 imo though. Of course, the real question is do you want a fast paced RTS, or a slow paced TBS?zomglolcats

Civilization IV Complete.You get more from it...

Civ IV.