does the core i7 actually improve fps?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Noobivore36
Noobivore36

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Noobivore36
Member since 2009 • 132 Posts
How important would you say the core i7 is for imrpoving actual gaming framerates when compared to the video card and RAM? If you were to weight each of these 3 components (% out of 100) proportionally to how much they contribute to gaming power, what would you give them? Here's my go at it: CPU: 30% GPU: 60% RAM: 10%
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
As of this moment in time I would say it only givea an average of 10% more in games over Coreduo type of cpu's or AMD equals. The Gpu is the most important and cpu and ram are about the same since they work hand in hand. So GPU: 60% RAM: 20% CPU: 20%
Avatar image for jtschmitz
jtschmitz

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jtschmitz
Member since 2009 • 293 Posts

EDIT: Forgot to say "Mine:" so...

Mine:
GPU: 60%
RAM: 5%
CPU: 35%

I've seen 2GB of 667 do respectable with a good video/cpu.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Not enough ram hurts performance and really slow ram does cause an impact on performance but not a huge one
Avatar image for jtschmitz
jtschmitz

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jtschmitz
Member since 2009 • 293 Posts

Oh I agree, but given the choice of which to sacrifice I would always take slower ram for a faster processor.

Avatar image for Noobivore36
Noobivore36

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Noobivore36
Member since 2009 • 132 Posts
so then what exactly does the cpu do for games that isn't covered by the gpu or ram? And then what does the ram do that isn't covered by the other two components, etc.?
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

It varies between games so you cant say but as a rule of thumb the GPU is the most important part.

Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

Not much if upgrade from a Core 2 Quad CPU. However, dual graphic cards are supposed to have improved performances with i7. I can't say I experienced this due to the fact I'm only running with 1 GTX 285.

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

GPU: 70%

RAM: 2%

CPU: 28%

I don't know, I got a PII 955 and I'm happy with it.

Avatar image for simardbrad
simardbrad

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 simardbrad
Member since 2004 • 2355 Posts

GPU: %55

CPU: %40

RAM: %5

GPU is by far the most important for gaming now-a-days. CPUs are needed if you do more than game (like I do) and when games start to become multithreaded/multicored more than the CPU will take more of the work away. Ram, well you need it, but 2gb of ram can still go a long way in this day and age.

Avatar image for denicola_a_god
denicola_a_god

323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 denicola_a_god
Member since 2007 • 323 Posts

i really need this processor its one of the fastest on the market

Avatar image for xialon
xialon

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#12 xialon
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

With the i7's price tag, it is not worth the small increase in fraps. Just stick to dual cores (around 3.2Ghz), and you will not see a huge difference with the i7's.

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#13 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

With the i7's price tag, it is not worth the small increase in fraps. Just stick to dual cores (around 3.2Ghz), and you will not see a huge difference with the i7's.

xialon

Will there be a time in the near future that developers utilize the i7 making it worth it? I bet by then I would probably need a new computer anyways.

Avatar image for SinfulPotato
SinfulPotato

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SinfulPotato
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts

[QUOTE="xialon"]

With the i7's price tag, it is not worth the small increase in fraps. Just stick to dual cores (around 3.2Ghz), and you will not see a huge difference with the i7's.

Mr_Ditters

Will there be a time in the near future that developers utilize the i7 making it worth it? I bet by then I would probably need a new computer anyways.

Yes, but not in the current i7's life time. People forget that developers will makes games for the largest audience. I would say 1% of all PC gamers even have i7's... Thus you won't see a game requiring it in the current i7's life time. Dual cores are still the most popular CPU and will stay that way for a few years to come. Game making is a business. Cryteck made the mistake of making a game with high requirements. Then they cried that piracy was to blame for not doing so well. The developers that sell millions make games for that largest audience. Take a look at the source engine.. You can run those games extremely well on an old system. Thus your audience is very large which means more $$$. I think it really comes down to this. If you are a gamer, and do no heavy media type activity's. Like if you burn one DVD a month. Get a high clocked dual core. If you are a heavy media freak a quad might be up your ally.