dual cores? quad cores? confusing me

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kingphillip
kingphillip

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kingphillip
Member since 2004 • 217 Posts

ok I just need some help with cores and core speeds here, because I'm hopeless with computer things. I have a pentium 4 3.2 ghz core. I always see people talkin about a dual core thats 2.5 ghz, whats the difference because it sounds slower thatn a 3.2ghz or whatevr. I'm planning to change my core in future to a quad processer, can anyone help me here?

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts
Just get a dual core that 3ghz or better, or you can get a Quad and just oc to 3ghz... game dont really play all that better with 4ghz or 3... they just dont take any advantage of the processor right now. only in 3dmark will you see a difference, but 3dmark is not a game. And a dual core is about 5x better that a P4 at 3.2ghz or better, not really sire on that.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

Clock speeds are an innaccurate measurement of a processor's capabilities in this day and age. They're only useful for comparing processors from the same lineup. With that being said, the Core 2 Duo can do more with two cores clocked at 2.4GHz than a Pentium 4 clocked at 3.2GHz could ever hope to do. The Core 2 Duo has a much more efficient method of using that clock speed, making it a vastly superior processor. Having two cores also helps, since one core can focus on one task while the other core can focus on another task. Or if an application is multi-threaded, the application can use both cores in conjunction with each other for an even greater improvement in performance.

Think of GHz like horsepower in a car. It's all well and good to say one car is better because it has 300WHp and another car only has 225WHp, but if the first car is 1500lbs heavier and is front-wheel drive while the second car is a midship-engine rear-wheel drive design, guess which car is probably going to be better, and use its horsepower more efficiently?

Avatar image for zache86
zache86

424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 zache86
Member since 2006 • 424 Posts
Nice comparison, right on.
Avatar image for SearchMaster
SearchMaster

7243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SearchMaster
Member since 2005 • 7243 Posts

Think of GHz like horsepower in a car. It's all well and good to say one car is better because it has 300WHp and another car only has 225WHp, but if the first car is 1500lbs heavier and is front-wheel drive while the second car is a midship-engine rear-wheel drive design, guess which car is probably going to be better, and use its horsepower more efficiently?

RayvinAzn
I always like your comparsions, where do you get these from ? :D