dx 10 coming to linux

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

http://apcmag.com/directx-10-in-linux-through-wine-and-crossover.htm

I think this is pretty cool

Even more games will be playable on wine.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Seriously, people that use Linux are just lame.

Yeah, I went there JigglyWiggly! :P

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

Seriously, people that use Linux are just lame.

Yeah, I went there JigglyWiggly! :P

Daytona_178

why?

its faster safer and more stable

whats so great about windows?

Avatar image for supras989
supras989

1558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 supras989
Member since 2006 • 1558 Posts

hey thats pretty coool news, but yeah lots not start any arguments, both operating systems have their pros and cons

Avatar image for rronqe
rronqe

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rronqe
Member since 2007 • 207 Posts
Linux has everything expect gaming. Thats why we all use Windows!
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

You still have to use WINE. What's the point, you're still using Windows.

Linux is only godly if you are A) a programmer, B) are really cheap, C) want to think you're somehow better than all other PC users just becuase you use some GUI version of Linux.

The advantages of Linux are not that great anymore. Both OSX and Windows 7 are much easier to understand, way higher usability, and everything works on it. A command line version of Linux has it's place. I use it for large file storage servers. It is faster, safer, and cheaper than Windows Server (which is garbage).

As for an OS for a home user, Linux just has far to many annoyances and problems. Sure you can prove that you know how to read a manual and learn new software, but in the long run you are missing out on tons of functionality OSX and Windows offer in terms of application support. Is that really worth saying that you know what an "ls" command does?

Avatar image for herezjarchus
herezjarchus

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 herezjarchus
Member since 2007 • 316 Posts

Linux has everything expect gaming. Thats why we all use Windows!rronqe
True, but I believe that if there would be no bigger differences about gaming on linux and windows then most gamers would change their systems to linux as the more efficient, customizable, free and innovative operating system. The only thing keeping me on still using windows on my pc is gaming, otherwise I would have only use linux as my os.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

You still have to use WINE. What's the point, you're still using Windows.

Linux is only godly if you are A) a programmer, B) are really cheap, C) want to think you're somehow better than all other PC users just becuase you use some GUI version of Linux.

The advantages of Linux are not that great anymore. Both OSX and Windows 7 are much easier to understand, way higher usability, and everything works on it. A command line version of Linux has it's place. I use it for large file storage servers. It is faster, safer, and cheaper than Windows Server (which is garbage).

As for an OS for a home user, Linux just has far to many annoyances and problems. Sure you can prove that you know how to read a manual and learn new software, but in the long run you are missing out on tons of functionality OSX and Windows offer in terms of application support. Is that really worth saying that you know what an "ls" command does?

Wasdie
but you gain alot of flexibility and software when using linux. There are many different versions of linux for different people, ubuntu being great for just about anyone. Only problem Ive found is certain hardware wont work without tweaking, but other hardware seems to work with less hassle than windows and especially mac osx. But I admit, windows 7 is pretty good and has me back with windows for now.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#9 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

but you gain alot of flexibility and software when using linux. There are many different versions of linux for different people, ubuntu being great for just about anyone. Only problem Ive found is certain hardware wont work without tweaking, but other hardware seems to work with less hassle than windows and especially mac osx. But I admit, windows 7 is pretty good and has me back with windows for now.TerrorRizzing

Flexibility and software? Last time I checked most software was written for the Windows or Mac environment. How is that gaining software?

The things Linux users tell me that are advantages of Linux always are it's more flexible and it has free software. I've never found a program that I've needed that was strictly for Linux and I do a ton of different stuff with my computer. Anything from audio and video editing, to writing applications (software engineer), designing software systems, word processing, photo editing, gaming, video capture, basic internet browsing... all for free on Windows.

When it comes down to it, the only real advantages of Linux are the very small kernel size, requires very little resources, it is more secure because most viruses and stuff are written as Windows executable files, and it's free. However you miss out on tons of applications, more often than not the GUIS are copies of Windows or just plain confusing, and installing new hardware is tricky. Not to mention you miss out on all of the glorious gaming that Windows has to offer and even OSX is starting to offer.

As I said before, Linux is great for programmers and servers as well as a lot of machines and large super computers (they actually use UNIX) but I can't see any major advantages of using it as your home OS. Sure Windows 7 takes a bit longer to start up and can take some more system resources, but in an age of 6+ gigs of ram and quad core processors clocked at 3.5 ghz, these aren't major issues.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"] but you gain alot of flexibility and software when using linux. There are many different versions of linux for different people, ubuntu being great for just about anyone. Only problem Ive found is certain hardware wont work without tweaking, but other hardware seems to work with less hassle than windows and especially mac osx. But I admit, windows 7 is pretty good and has me back with windows for now.Wasdie

Flexibility and software? Last time I checked most software was written for the Windows or Mac environment. How is that gaining software?

The things Linux users tell me that are advantages of Linux always are it's more flexible and it has free software. I've never found a program that I've needed that was strictly for Linux and I do a ton of different stuff with my computer. Anything from audio and video editing, to writing applications (software engineer), designing software systems, word processing, photo editing, gaming, video capture, basic internet browsing... all for free on Windows.

When it comes down to it, the only real advantages of Linux are the very small kernel size, requires very little resources, it is more secure because most viruses and stuff are written as Windows executable files, and it's free. However you miss out on tons of applications, more often than not the GUIS are copies of Windows or just plain confusing, and installing new hardware is tricky. Not to mention you miss out on all of the glorious gaming that Windows has to offer and even OSX is starting to offer.

As I said before, Linux is great for programmers and servers as well as a lot of machines and large super computers (they actually use UNIX) but I can't see any major advantages of using it as your home OS. Sure Windows 7 takes a bit longer to start up and can take some more system resources, but in an age of 6+ gigs of ram and quad core processors clocked at 3.5 ghz, these aren't major issues.

Some of my favorite software is linux only, or atleast I haven't found a good replacement for things like K3b, rhythm box and gimp. I really dont do much on a computer that cant be done in any os, But I really like those three programs. But I admit, at this stage I just use windows 7 as Im happy with it, I was in no way happy with windows xp and actually gamed on console all last gen.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Linux would've been great if many wonderful apps such as Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity were Linux-only. Since they're also available for Windows, that sort of limited its appeal.

Heck. I remember Gimp as being Linux only at one time. Now, my daughter use Gimp in school but on Windows PCs and Macs! That was a wonderful turn of events. Same goes for Open Office.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#12 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Linux would've been great if many wonderful apps such as Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity were Linux-only. Since they're also available for Windows, that sort of limited its appeal.

jun_aka_pekto

I use Open Office, Audacity, and Paint.net as well as Virtualdub all on my PC for free. I believe GIMP is also on Windows as well. It really does make Linux feel kind of pointless when the best software is all on Windows.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

Linux would've been great if many wonderful apps such as Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity were Linux-only. Since they're also available for Windows, that sort of limited its appeal.

Heck. I remember Gimp as being Linux only at one time. Now, my daughter use Gimp in school but on Windows PCs and Macs! That was a wonderful turn of events. Same goes for Open Office.

jun_aka_pekto
I didn't even know that gimp was on pc, we just need k3b and rhythmbox now, windows 7 is really alot better than windows xp and Ive switched back to windows.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

why?

its faster safer and more stable

whats so great about windows?

dontshackzmii

It's not faster and, holy hell, there's no way in anyone's wildest imagination for it to be more stable :?

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18249 Posts
nice. the sooner gaming on linux becomes more of an option, the sooner i can ditch windows. outside fo games i have exactly 0 reasons to use windows.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

Linux would've been great if many wonderful apps such as Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity were Linux-only. Since they're also available for Windows, that sort of limited its appeal.

Wasdie

I use Open Office, Audacity, and Paint.net as well as Virtualdub all on my PC for free. I believe GIMP is also on Windows as well. It really does make Linux feel kind of pointless when the best software is all on Windows.

Linux isn't pointless just yet. I actually like it. But, there's simply no good reason for me to switch to it unless I fall into hard times and can't afford Windows anymore.

Between pirating Windows or using Linux, I rather use Linux. It's decent enough to be a primary OS. But, it also need apps of its own (exclusives if you will, in gaming speak) for me to want it. That said, I keep up to date on Linux development.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

Linux would've been great if many wonderful apps such as Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity were Linux-only. Since they're also available for Windows, that sort of limited its appeal.

Heck. I remember Gimp as being Linux only at one time. Now, my daughter use Gimp in school but on Windows PCs and Macs! That was a wonderful turn of events. Same goes for Open Office.

TerrorRizzing

I didn't even know that gimp was on pc, we just need k3b and rhythmbox now, windows 7 is really alot better than windows xp and Ive switched back to windows.

The first versions back in 2003 were clunky. At this point, Gimp for Windows is quite decent. My daughter has it on both her Windows PC and Mac Mini.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#18 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

nice. the sooner gaming on linux becomes more of an option, the sooner i can ditch windows. outside fo games i have exactly 0 reasons to use windows.osan0

You still need WINE to run DX 10 on Linux... that is still using Windows.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="osan0"]nice. the sooner gaming on linux becomes more of an option, the sooner i can ditch windows. outside fo games i have exactly 0 reasons to use windows.Wasdie

You still need WINE to run DX 10 on Linux... that is still using Windows.

It's an API layer, that's really not even comparable, not to mention peformance hits are quuestionable depending on the application, in fact Office 2007 runs better in wine than in Windows. I had a link to that, don't know where it is now. 2010 won't run... However most of every 3d app runs worse, but performance varies wildly.

Anyway, there are quite a few programs that aren't on Windows that are on Linux first.

SSH, I mean come on, I am a man who needs SSH. (Don't say cygwin)
I can put my wireless card into monitor mode...
Great network diagnostic tools built right into the box in Ubuntu, Debian I think has them too... (may be a gnome thing)
Freedomz, I can have GUIs installed at the same time and only use one aka /etc/init.d/gdm start or /etc/init.d/kde start

I am not a huge fan of Wine, so I really don't care about the achievements. Mainly because my laptop sucks too much and that's where I use Linux the most(t8100 2.1 c2d, 8400mgs 4 gigs of ram), besides my sexah serverz.

RAID implementation is sooooooooo much better with MDADM, no need to use my motherboard's silly fakeraid, I can use the OS to do it with much more customizablity.

Smart monitoring tools are all way better.

Pretty much no risk of getting malware, however for fun you can test and see which malware works by running it in wine. (Bad idea, it can effect your Linux install)

Also Samba(you may be tinkin WHY WOULD I NEED SAMBA ON WINDOWS)
but Samba is better than Windows networking even though it's kind of emulating it. I love how I can create Unix accounts and then tie a windows network user to them and specify permissions .It's just so clean, and it doesn't cost anything... where in Windows it costs like thousands.
Of course all those Indian IT workers are all Windows nubs lol(The majority I've worked with, not being racist, Microsoft takes them from India and stuff).

So yeah...
Depends what your doing, I dual boot on my laptop, and I just switch to whatever OS depending on the mood I'm in... it doesn't really make a difference most of the time.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

Seriously, people that use Linux are just lame.

Yeah, I went there JigglyWiggly! :P

dontshackzmii

why?

its faster safer and more stable

whats so great about windows?

I was only joking, I guess it didn't come across that well :(
Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
Captain__Tripps

4523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Captain__Tripps
Member since 2006 • 4523 Posts

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

Seriously, people that use Linux are just lame.

Yeah, I went there JigglyWiggly! :P

dontshackzmii

why?

its faster safer and more stable

whats so great about windows?

My Windows never crashes... Whats so great about linux on the desktop? I have nothing against linux, its great for servers. But I doubt i'd ever use it again on the desktop, just no point other than being different.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Linux :P. Great for servers, that is about it.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
Linux :P. Great for servers, that is about it. millerlight89
It's free, at it's core it's incredibly secure, and if you know what you're doing its completely customizable.
Avatar image for psych0mantra
psych0mantra

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 psych0mantra
Member since 2010 • 231 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Linux :P. Great for servers, that is about it. i5750at4Ghz
It's free, at it's core it's incredibly secure, and if you know what you're doing its completely customizable.

Exactly, if you know what you're doing. Most users don't know what they're doing in that respect. Which is why most people use either Windows, or OSX.
Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

Well when I build my media centre PC I doubt Linux can bitstream DTS-MA tracks from a GPU to an AVR. The only real problem with Linux is lack of support for everything you want to do with your PC, easily or at all.

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
IMO Linux is great, for everyday work, server, programming and just about anything. It can be made to look cooler than OS X or Windows, has a great customizability and decent software support. Not too mention Open Source.
Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

IMO Linux is great, for everyday work, server, programming and just about anything. It can be made to look cooler than OS X or Windows, has a great customizability and decent software support. Not too mention Open Source.gigatrainer

You forgot Blu-Ray playback - which doesn't work.

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts

[QUOTE="gigatrainer"]IMO Linux is great, for everyday work, server, programming and just about anything. It can be made to look cooler than OS X or Windows, has a great customizability and decent software support. Not too mention Open Source.desertpython

You forgot Blu-Ray playback - which doesn't work.

What? When did I say something works or something else doesn't? Linux might be lacking some features but it really isn't that bad. Honestly I couldn't find a good HD player for OS X as well(AVCHD that is) which does proper de-interlacing(WMP is best in this one).
Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

[QUOTE="desertpython"]

[QUOTE="gigatrainer"]IMO Linux is great, for everyday work, server, programming and just about anything. It can be made to look cooler than OS X or Windows, has a great customizability and decent software support. Not too mention Open Source.gigatrainer

You forgot Blu-Ray playback - which doesn't work.

What? When did I say something works or something else doesn't? Linux might be lacking some features but it really isn't that bad. Honestly I couldn't find a good HD player for OS X as well(AVCHD that is) which does proper de-interlacing(WMP is best in this one).

IMO Linux is great, for everyday work, server, programming and just about anything. which would include Blu-Ray playback but it doesn't. DVD's don't even work out of the box.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Yeah, because that's copyrighted. Which is why when you try to play one Ubuntu asks for a DL.
Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#31 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts

You still have to use WINE. What's the point, you're still using Windows.

Linux is only godly if you are A) a programmer, B) are really cheap, C) want to think you're somehow better than all other PC users just becuase you use some GUI version of Linux.

The advantages of Linux are not that great anymore. Both OSX and Windows 7 are much easier to understand, way higher usability, and everything works on it. A command line version of Linux has it's place. I use it for large file storage servers. It is faster, safer, and cheaper than Windows Server (which is garbage).

As for an OS for a home user, Linux just has far to many annoyances and problems. Sure you can prove that you know how to read a manual and learn new software, but in the long run you are missing out on tons of functionality OSX and Windows offer in terms of application support. Is that really worth saying that you know what an "ls" command does?

Wasdie
Im kinda surprised to see this written by a mod. I have dual partitions. A majority of my browsing and average daily use is done on Linux. It provides quick startup, its easy to have multiple desktops which is a god send when writing a paper or working on a project that requires me to have many different windows of information open at a time (something windows still hasn't done for some reason). The memory and CPU requirements are barebones and for what its worth with ubuntu and kubuntu are at the level of development now that most hardware has already got either open or close source drivers and support that can be loaded with the click of a button at a repository location already loaded onto the PC from installation. When I wanna game I flip over to my Windows PC. Windows has come a tremendous way in bridging the gap but there are still things here or there than Linux can do just as good for free. There really is VERY little hassle with installing ubuntu now and updates are so easy its kind of a heartache to look back of the days of having to recompile and then manually install via terminal. I would agree that a majority of the users who NEED it would be those hosting servers and users in the know but there is definitely a place for ubuntu in the average PC users home. I recently slapped ubuntu on a 2002 laptop and lo and behold its as zippy as many new laptops in doing the average things people do on the go on a laptop sans a 600$ update (read: new laptop). I know many people I would rather teach ubuntu to and never have them update it. Heck most home users refuse to use updates for windows and then suddenly wonder why they were infected through the gaping hole they refused to close with a patch MS release 6+ months prior. I have my grandmother on ubuntu on her home PC because its teach and forget. She will be much safer with never updating ubuntu then never updating a windows PC and accruing shed loads of garbage in the process.
Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#32 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
Yeah, because that's copyrighted. Which is why when you try to play one Ubuntu asks for a DL.JigglyWiggly_
Open source equiv: VLC "it only does everything"
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

Microsoft will just keep making new versions of DirectX because they know they have basically two things that enable them maintain their lock on the home PC OS market: Having almost every computer that people buy in retail chains come with Windows already installed, and gaming.

Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
Captain__Tripps

4523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Captain__Tripps
Member since 2006 • 4523 Posts
I don't know if thats really true... If MS neglected DX, another windows standard API would likely emerge or games would just use opengl. I think MS continues to improve it because its a proving ground for directx for future consoles. They'd still have their monopoly even without games imo, theres really nothing that could remotely challenge windows on a consumer level.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

I don't know if thats really true... If MS neglected DX, another windows standard API would likely emerge or games would just use opengl. I think MS continues to improve it because its a proving ground for directx for future consoles. They'd still have their monopoly even without games imo, theres really nothing that could remotely challenge windows on a consumer level.Captain__Tripps
Well, I said that was one of the two things. It's the thing that keeps the more "geeky" among computer people using their stuff. Of course, then there are the people that sit around trying to figure out ways to get specific games to run on Linux, but those people are crazy. ;) I don't think they are even interested in playing the game most of the time. They just want to get it to run on Linux. :P

Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
[QUOTE="magicalclick"]What Linux? I thought you mean Unix. Linux is just bad in comparison. Real OS people would root for Unix any day. But, anyway, I am a programer, and I don't Linux at all. The command line is simply not for me. I can't code without VS. I need IDE to take care of my tiny brain. Yes, my brain is tiny, but, I am creative. I can make really good program, but, I need IDE to babysit me. The better word is, "layer of abstraction", and that's what I needed. I am not talking about theoratical layer of abstraction, I literatly need it to be a creative programer. Ofc, those all mighty and high Linux people will look down on me. But, ultimatly, I still get the job done.

Linux is a GUI that uses Unix or some variation of it. How can it be worse than Unix? There are Linux distributions that are not really any less user friendly than Windows. There are many operating systems that fall under the "Linux" umbrella.
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="millerlight89"]Linux :P. Great for servers, that is about it. psych0mantra
It's free, at it's core it's incredibly secure, and if you know what you're doing its completely customizable.

Exactly, if you know what you're doing. Most users don't know what they're doing in that respect. Which is why most people use either Windows, or OSX.

I like to be able to use Autodesk Inventor, Photoshop, and play games on the same computer. I used to dual boot Ubuntu and used to work with Debian, but for a home OS linux is a joke. You can argue security, but that's because almost every virus is made as an executable (which only runs on windows). UNIX systems are usually very efficient, but with half assed GUIs and dependency on command line I just don't think anyone will ever make decent commercial software for it.
Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
[QUOTE="magicalclick"]What Linux? I thought you mean Unix. Linux is just bad in comparison. Real OS people would root for Unix any day. But, anyway, I am a programer, and I don't Linux at all. The command line is simply not for me. I can't code without VS. I need IDE to take care of my tiny brain. Yes, my brain is tiny, but, I am creative. I can make really good program, but, I need IDE to babysit me. The better word is, "layer of abstraction", and that's what I needed. I am not talking about theoratical layer of abstraction, I literatly need it to be a creative programer. Ofc, those all mighty and high Linux people will look down on me. But, ultimatly, I still get the job done.

What makes you think Linux is command line only and has no IDE?
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
[QUOTE="gigatrainer"][QUOTE="magicalclick"]What Linux? I thought you mean Unix. Linux is just bad in comparison. Real OS people would root for Unix any day. But, anyway, I am a programer, and I don't Linux at all. The command line is simply not for me. I can't code without VS. I need IDE to take care of my tiny brain. Yes, my brain is tiny, but, I am creative. I can make really good program, but, I need IDE to babysit me. The better word is, "layer of abstraction", and that's what I needed. I am not talking about theoratical layer of abstraction, I literatly need it to be a creative programer. Ofc, those all mighty and high Linux people will look down on me. But, ultimatly, I still get the job done.

What makes you think Linux is command line only and has no IDE?

What makes someone bump this thread a week later to address a point I already did? :P
Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="gigatrainer"][QUOTE="magicalclick"]What Linux? I thought you mean Unix. Linux is just bad in comparison. Real OS people would root for Unix any day. But, anyway, I am a programer, and I don't Linux at all. The command line is simply not for me. I can't code without VS. I need IDE to take care of my tiny brain. Yes, my brain is tiny, but, I am creative. I can make really good program, but, I need IDE to babysit me. The better word is, "layer of abstraction", and that's what I needed. I am not talking about theoratical layer of abstraction, I literatly need it to be a creative programer. Ofc, those all mighty and high Linux people will look down on me. But, ultimatly, I still get the job done.

What makes you think Linux is command line only and has no IDE?

What makes someone bump this thread a week later to address a point I already did? :P

Uhmmm..........:P I was going through my old posts and saw this one with 11 new posts. And I forgot about the date. :P