This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AYrols
AYrols

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 AYrols
Member since 2006 • 194 Posts

Which do you think is better for the money?

or better at all ?

Avatar image for SDxSnOOpZ
SDxSnOOpZ

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SDxSnOOpZ
Member since 2006 • 225 Posts
i'm leaning toward Q6600 because it's quadcore.
Avatar image for AYrols
AYrols

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 AYrols
Member since 2006 • 194 Posts

I don't know much about this but some people told me that the q6600 temperature is very hot for a cpu and it need a good cooler anda good case I am little worried about this

Avatar image for Dwarfius2
Dwarfius2

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dwarfius2
Member since 2006 • 141 Posts
I chose E6750. Why? Because the Q6600 is not a very powerful quad core. Wait for Penryns to come out. The E6750 is only 205 CAD and will not be a bottleneck at all for gaming.
Avatar image for skinnypete91
skinnypete91

6022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 skinnypete91
Member since 2006 • 6022 Posts

I chose E6750. Why? Because the Q6600 is not a very powerful quad core. Wait for Penryns to come out. The E6750 is only 205 CAD and will not be a bottleneck at all for gaming.Dwarfius2

I sort of agree with this...

The Q6600 IS powerful, but it depends how long you want your PC to last.

A Q6600 will probably last longer, as apps get optimised for more cores but at the moment, the E6750 will beat it in most games.

If you just need current raw speed, go for the E6750.

Oh yeah, if you need the processor for something other than gaming, such as video encoding, I think the quad will do a lot better.

Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts

[QUOTE="Dwarfius2"]I chose E6750. Why? Because the Q6600 is not a very powerful quad core. Wait for Penryns to come out. The E6750 is only 205 CAD and will not be a bottleneck at all for gaming.skinnypete91

I sort of agree with this...

The Q6600 IS powerful, but it depends how long you want your PC to last.

A Q6600 will probably last longer, as apps get optimised for more cores but at the moment, the E6750 will beat it in most games.

If you just need current raw speed, go for the E6750.

Oh yeah, if you need the processor for something other than gaming, such as video encoding, I think the quad will do a lot better.

u can overclock the quad and have more speed and more cores than the e6750

Avatar image for Manly-manly-man
Manly-manly-man

3477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Manly-manly-man
Member since 2006 • 3477 Posts
Why the E6750? The E6850 is the same price as the Q6600.
Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
OoSuperMarioO

6539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 OoSuperMarioO
Member since 2005 • 6539 Posts
i'm leaning toward Q6600 because it's quadcore.SDxSnOOpZ
I notice you oc your processor, how much plus performance are you getting on fps during games?
Avatar image for manic111
manic111

1280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 manic111
Member since 2005 • 1280 Posts
[QUOTE="skinnypete91"]

[QUOTE="Dwarfius2"]I chose E6750. Why? Because the Q6600 is not a very powerful quad core. Wait for Penryns to come out. The E6750 is only 205 CAD and will not be a bottleneck at all for gaming.r3351925

I sort of agree with this...

The Q6600 IS powerful, but it depends how long you want your PC to last.

A Q6600 will probably last longer, as apps get optimised for more cores but at the moment, the E6750 will beat it in most games.

If you just need current raw speed, go for the E6750.

Oh yeah, if you need the processor for something other than gaming, such as video encoding, I think the quad will do a lot better.

u can overclock the quad and have more speed and more cores than the e6750

Butthe6750willOChigher,asituseslesspowerandgetslesshot.

Avatar image for AYrols
AYrols

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 AYrols
Member since 2006 • 194 Posts
thx guys I think I'll go for the E6750 cuz I'm little short on money
Avatar image for muchmoneyg
muchmoneyg

287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 muchmoneyg
Member since 2007 • 287 Posts
get the quad, its only 300 bucks on newegg and it will blow that othe processor away in a month or two
Avatar image for dayaccus007
dayaccus007

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 dayaccus007
Member since 2007 • 4349 Posts
Q6600 is not worthing for 5fps more
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts

Did the Q6600 already drop in price???

Eh. In in the same boat as this kid. Im not sure if i should get the Q6600 or the E6850. Like i want to be ready games start taking advantage of quad core because right now most games dont even take advantage of core 2 duo yet.

Avatar image for dayaccus007
dayaccus007

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dayaccus007
Member since 2007 • 4349 Posts
Insome shops yes
Avatar image for commander1122
commander1122

1165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 commander1122
Member since 2005 • 1165 Posts
errr........any 1 have a link that show P4 3.2 VS Q6600 - -"....i need c how big different is the speed and score >.
Avatar image for neogeo419
neogeo419

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 neogeo419
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts
errr........any 1 have a link that show P4 3.2 VS Q6600 - -"....i need c how big different is the speed and score >.commander1122
Go to Tom's hardware and check out the CPU 2007 charts. If that is a single core p4 the difference is pretty huge.
Avatar image for commander1122
commander1122

1165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 commander1122
Member since 2005 • 1165 Posts
can send me the link???plz pump =_="
Avatar image for neogeo419
neogeo419

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 neogeo419
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html
Avatar image for commander1122
commander1122

1165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 commander1122
Member since 2005 • 1165 Posts
thx...Wow my p4 3.2 Ghz 966 3d marks only:cry:....and Q6600 3507 @.@......better then e6850 2603 only......going get Q6600 Aug for Crysis n Bioshock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=.=
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
Q6600 is not worthing for 5fps moredayaccus007
agreed games are just now utlizing dual cores so you should be just fine with a E6750 its a great dual core and if you get it you'll save like $120 bucks by getting it then you can save that money and upgrade to a quad core when you really need it
Avatar image for SDxSnOOpZ
SDxSnOOpZ

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 SDxSnOOpZ
Member since 2006 • 225 Posts

[QUOTE="SDxSnOOpZ"]i'm leaning toward Q6600 because it's quadcore.OoSuperMarioO
I notice you oc your processor, how much plus performance are you getting on fps during games?

With 3DMark06, I gained atleast 800pts or around 3-4fps, the most gain came from overclocking the gpu. I didnt really benchmark any games, but the FPS increased for sure.

Avatar image for TronX
TronX

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 TronX
Member since 2003 • 26 Posts

I would suggest the e6750 with a p35 mb that supports 45nm, and of course 1333fsb. Then upgrade to a yorkfield q9450 in 6 months, by that time they will be between 250 to $300. I would like to go quad core right now but I would much rather have a q9450 then a q6600 for the same price, so Im gonna wait for a month for the true Quads. Thats just my opinion, I welcome yours.

Avatar image for musclesforcier
musclesforcier

2894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 musclesforcier
Member since 2004 • 2894 Posts

I would suggest the e6750 with a p35 mb that supports 45nm, and of course 1333fsb. Then upgrade to a yorkfield q9450 in 6 months, by that time they will be between 250 to $300. I would like to go quad core right now but I would much rather have a q9450 then a q6600 for the same price, so Im gonna wait for a month for the true Quads. Thats just my opinion, I welcome yours.

TronX

This thread is over 2 months old...

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts
For those on a tight budget, the E6550 would probably tide you over until native quads hit the streets. For those with cash to burn, if you can wait for the Yorkfield quads, then do. Had I known the Yorkfields were going to be that cheap, I might have waited to build my new system. Though I would like to see some Kentsfield vs Yorkfield benches. I suspect the real performance increase will come with next years Nehalems. Intel is moving so quickly, no matter what proc you choose, it will likely be supplanted in six months. Anyone have any new info on the Phenom procs yet?
Avatar image for Forerunner-117
Forerunner-117

8800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Forerunner-117
Member since 2006 • 8800 Posts

I would suggest the e6750 with a p35 mb that supports 45nm, and of course 1333fsb. Then upgrade to a yorkfield q9450 in 6 months, by that time they will be between 250 to $300. I would like to go quad core right now but I would much rather have a q9450 then a q6600 for the same price, so Im gonna wait for a month for the true Quads. Thats just my opinion, I welcome yours.

TronX

hmm... yeah i might do that...