This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SalikTirmizi
SalikTirmizi

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 SalikTirmizi
Member since 2008 • 95 Posts

is FarCry 2 better than the original because the reviews i have read suggest its above average but not upto originals standards your recommendations who has played both games.THX

Avatar image for 555SSOO
555SSOO

1873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 137

User Lists: 0

#2 555SSOO
Member since 2008 • 1873 Posts

I don't know if it's better then the first,but it is a great/good game and you should bay it.

Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#3 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
Id imagine its better than the first, but either way from what ive seen its a good game.
Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#4 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts
It has nothing in common with first game, which was an open world linear story (if that makes sense). F2 is more sandbox and you will do a lot of driving and a lot of repetitive tasks.
Avatar image for Sordidus
Sordidus

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Sordidus
Member since 2008 • 2036 Posts

If you want FarCry 2 because you liked the original, then get Crysis because it's the true FarCry2. FarCry2 has nothing to do with the original and isn't a good game in my opinion.

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

Far Cry 2 is very different from Far Cry. FC2 is made by a whole different company. If you liked Far Cry play Crysis, it's made by the same company as FC, and has the same island jungle environments.

Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

11190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 11190 Posts

dont waste your money on it, awful game.

Avatar image for luv2program
luv2program

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 luv2program
Member since 2009 • 44 Posts
Yeah, it's not as good as the first one. Don't get it, if you ask me.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

FC 2 is pretty damn horrible, or rather pretty damn lacking.

there are only 4-5 quests, and they are getting repeated into numbness, (Like doping the same mission 7 times to get a decent sniper rifle)

The enemies respawn all the time (based on distance, not time) and about 60-70% of the game is driving around roads.

They even lack factions, and have the most assinine reason why the people you work for, are shooting at you too.

And the story... well the general backstory is quite good to be honest, but the execution is very poor

Like the rest here have said, go with Crysis if you do not have it, it is ALOT more akin to far cry, then far cry 2 is

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#10 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11622 Posts

I personally liked FC2 a hell of a lot better than the first one, the gameplay is simply more rewarding in my opinion. If you are very unimaginative, you will find the game boring, but if you are creative the game will provide endless hours of sandbox fun. sure, the missions structures remain similar throughout, but the way you play each mission can vary wildly from sneaking in to running in with a flamethrower and burning down the village.

that being said, if you want a psuedo sequel, stick with crysis, which is a better game that both far cry and farcry2 .

Avatar image for GPAddict
GPAddict

5964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 GPAddict
Member since 2005 • 5964 Posts

Far Cry 2 seems to be more favorable by critics. 85% on www.metacritic.com

But less favorable reviews from individual players.

I got it for free, so to me its worth it. Although I do admit there where times in the game where I had no clue what the heck was going on.

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#12 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

If you are very unimaginative, you will find the game boring, but if you are creative the game will provide endless hours of sandbox fun.

with_teeth26
LOL, okay I guess I'm one of those people, 'cause I found FC2 the worst FPS I've played in long time.
Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#13 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11622 Posts

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

If you are very unimaginative, you will find the game boring, but if you are creative the game will provide endless hours of sandbox fun.

Gooeykat

LOL, okay I guess I'm one of those people, 'cause I found FC2 the worst FPS I've played in long time.

Yea i guess so, i'm not insulting you, I can easily see how this game could be construed as boring and repetative, I just had a total blast playing it because of the number of ways you can approach each situation. i will admit that the checkpoints were bloody annoying, but they did not prevent me from really enjoying the game right up until the end. If you play the game for long enough there are some really neat missions, one in which you escape from a prison and have to sneak through the jungle with nothing but a knife, in that missions all the traffic on the roads made it very tense and enjoyable. In another mission at the end of act 1/beginning of act 2 you have to defend a ferry as it crosses a large lake. these missions were sread out, but common enough to keep the gameplay varied and interesting. later on, the plot goes in multiple directions and there are actually a fair number of important choices to be made. i gave the game a 9/10.

Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
no its not better then the original its a pretty bad game that i would avoid unless u can get in used on amazon or ebay for real cheap. the only thing the 2 games have in common are theres guns and they both have farcry in there name thats where the similarities end. farcry one which is actualy a very good game is made by crytek which knows how to make good fps i mean they brought us crysis. and u shouldnt fully trust reviews as fact game get overrated and underated all the time and a review is simply someones opinion :P
Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#15 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

I just had a total blast playing it because of the number of ways you can approach each situation. i will admit that the checkpoints were bloody annoying, but they did not prevent me from really enjoying the game right up until the end. with_teeth26

Well I enjoy games that offer multiple ways to complete goals (which is why I liked the original FC and Crysis), unfortunately the repetitive gameplay elements such as the jeep patrols, guard posts and the massive amounts of driving killed it for me. You actually spent more time getting to a mission than you do in the actual mission. If there is ever a mod created to correct these game flaws I might give it another chance. Anyway, I'm glad you liked it but I would say most people that didn't enjoy it wasn't because they don't have imaginations, it's was because they found the gameplay to painfully frustrating.

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

If you want FarCry 2 because you liked the original, then get Crysis because it's the true FarCry2. FarCry2 has nothing to do with the original and isn't a good game in my opinion.

Sordidus

That is not entirely correct, although I do see where you're coming from.

Crysis, although developed by Crytek, also has nothing to do with FarCry and carries a completely different storyline, features completely different enemies, and carries with it gameplay features that make it much different (nanosuit and weapon customization, especially, whereas in FarCry you had to be very careful and collect health kits in the process).

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#17 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

Yeah Crysis is more like a Far Cry sequel, even if it's not set in the same way.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
I liked far cry 2 more than the first, well the first was better until the halfway mark with the mutant stuff.
Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#19 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11622 Posts

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]I just had a total blast playing it because of the number of ways you can approach each situation. i will admit that the checkpoints were bloody annoying, but they did not prevent me from really enjoying the game right up until the end. Gooeykat

Well I enjoy games that offer multiple ways to complete goals (which is why I liked the original FC and Crysis), unfortunately the repetitive gameplay elements such as the jeep patrols, guard posts and the massive amounts of driving killed it for me. You actually spent more time getting to a mission than you do in the actual mission. If there is ever a mod created to correct these game flaws I might give it another chance. Anyway, I'm glad you liked it but I would say most people that didn't enjoy it wasn't because they don't have imaginations, it's was because they found the gameplay to painfully frustrating.

i don't know, i had similar problems with the driving at first, especially during the gun shop missions, but i found later on the bus system could be used with great effect to break up the driving sections into short and acceptable chunks. I think that if you go into the game with a goal based mindset, like i need to get here, go there, blow up this, then you won't enjoy it. If you play the game for the ride and dont rush, you will find yourself having fun with the checkpoints, toying with the mercs, and so on. Most of the things that made people hate this game really didn't bother me that much. i dunno why.

Personaly my biggest problem with the game was not the games fault, but my obsessive need to constantly take screenshots because the game looked so damn good. i found the beutiful landscape helped me through the longer drives, i was enjoying the scenery so much i didn't care how long the drive took, like going on a road trip through the rockies. The highway is long and winding, and you might have to stop a couple of times for traffic, wild animals, and to take a wiz, but the the mountains are so spectacular that all this is forgotton.

Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts
Id imagine its better than the first, but either way from what ive seen its a good game. Chris_53
Better than the first? That's a big N-O from me.