F.E.A.R. or S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for stepnkev
stepnkev

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 stepnkev
Member since 2005 • 1511 Posts

Which game is better in your opinion?

F.E.A.R.

or

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

 

Avatar image for MIYAMOTOnext007
MIYAMOTOnext007

3061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MIYAMOTOnext007
Member since 2006 • 3061 Posts
Depends what style of first-person shooter you like. In my opinion STALKER is much better and a game with some real emotion and intrigue. FEAR is fun when you just want to lose your mind and want to rip some bodies apart in slo-mo. They are both good at different things. Go with STALKER if you only have money for one, otherwise go with both!
Avatar image for justheretodl124
justheretodl124

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 justheretodl124
Member since 2005 • 1255 Posts
Stalker is much better
Avatar image for zayl99
zayl99

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 zayl99
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
I personally enjoyed FEAR more.
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts

FEAR has better graphics, game play, weapons, and AI.  Stalker has a better environment and weather and is very cool because they recreated the real Chernobyl area with many of the real buildings and object recreated almost verbatim.

Avatar image for FPSGunnerDude
FPSGunnerDude

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 FPSGunnerDude
Member since 2006 • 948 Posts
FEAR is better, and stalker is buggy so it may be good to wait for a few more patches.
Avatar image for joetira
joetira

2879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 joetira
Member since 2005 • 2879 Posts
i've only played fear but I want stalker. FEAR seems like its fire fights are a lot more fun though.
Avatar image for pwilletts
pwilletts

881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 pwilletts
Member since 2006 • 881 Posts
Id go with FEAR, you dont have as much freedom but the atmosphere of the entire game is so much better.
Avatar image for yian
yian

5166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 yian
Member since 2003 • 5166 Posts
Definitely STALKER. I love trees and outdoor environments, and STALKER has plenty of them.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60737 Posts

Theyre both way too different, but if I had to suggest:

FEAR: linear yet satisfying gameplay with smooth action, sweet guns, and amazing graphics.  All takes place indoors.

STALKER: somewhat non-linear gameplay (think Oblivion) with twitchy action, okay guns, decent graphics that portray the environment well, and interesting stuff.

Persnally I say STALKER simply because its trying a lot of newer things and is very different from most shooters.  To be honest, you could buy FEAR, Quake 4, Doom 3, and Prey and lump them all together because they are so similiar.  STALKER is the only standout game due to its gameplay.

Avatar image for BounceDK
BounceDK

7388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 BounceDK
Member since 2005 • 7388 Posts
Both are great games - So get both of them!
Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
Get both of the m if you can.
Avatar image for pwilletts
pwilletts

881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 pwilletts
Member since 2006 • 881 Posts
Get STALKER, and then FEAR Combat. with that you've got the best of both worlds.
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
FEAR is fun, but gets boring and repetitive; I couldn't bring myself to finish the campaign because it's just so repetitive. I haven't played STALKER long enough to make a complete comparison, but so far it beats out FEAR for the simple reason of more fighting environments. FEAR is just tunnel crawling all the way through. Stalker has the tunnel areas too, but it has the big outdoor bases also.
Avatar image for Xraydon
Xraydon

1227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Xraydon
Member since 2005 • 1227 Posts
FEAR is a great game never played STALKER
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
Havent played Stalker, but have played FEAR Combat and the full version on the 360. The single player is good but at times feels very linear, especially in the bad level design.
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
And FEAR imo doesnt run all that well as you would like, at high settings I got a bit of framerate drop in heavey fights that dropped just to low, and my rig is more than capable of getting way better frames, just felt very unoptimzed, FEAR Combat anyways, the full version may be better.
Avatar image for Erlkoenig
Erlkoenig

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Erlkoenig
Member since 2006 • 715 Posts
F.E.A.R. was cool for the first 2-3 hours or so. Seriously, every misson/level is the same: go to the last spot the bad guy was, and realizing that he was gone again, again, and again. I gave up at about 2/3 of the game. Go with S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
Avatar image for deactivated-63cd1530c7768
deactivated-63cd1530c7768

917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-63cd1530c7768
Member since 2003 • 917 Posts

Which game is better in your opinion?

F.E.A.R.

or

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

 

stepnkev
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. kills F.E.A.R. defenetily! Have fun!
Avatar image for drsleo
drsleo

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 drsleo
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
Yes .... F.E.A.R.... the best, fear combat good fps online
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#21 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
STALKER is the better game unless -you suck at games -you really like linear games -you aren't interested in choice/rpg elements
Avatar image for chrisoff_1
chrisoff_1

4138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 chrisoff_1
Member since 2003 • 4138 Posts

i couldnt even bring myself to finish FEAR i found the game highly repetitive and downright boring, great graphics and ai aside it had some of the most uninspired level design i ever had the displeasure of playing through. i think stalker is better in every catagoery.............. taste goes a huge way in deciding which one you prefer mind you they are very diffrent games

 

Avatar image for Warpld
Warpld

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#23 Warpld
Member since 2007 • 132 Posts

Too many barrels and crates in F.E.A.R.. Why do they always have to overpopulate shooters with those two objects!??! Sure F.E.A.R. has Alma and great firefights but that just isn't enough to make the game great between running from one barrel-filled corridor to the other.

 S.T.A.L.K.E.R. kicks ass despite its bugs. And if you don't have it already, you can start now with patch 1.0001 which fixes many issues.

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
And FEAR imo doesnt run all that well as you would like, at high settings I got a bit of framerate drop in heavey fights that dropped just to low, and my rig is more than capable of getting way better frames, just felt very unoptimzed, FEAR Combat anyways, the full version may be better.V4LENT1NE
Meh, I disagree, it runs way better than CoD2. I can run it at 1280 res, 2 AA, 16 AF, and my pc is 1.5 years old. The devs even said the game wasn't meant for higher than 1024 res. Anyway, it is stupid to just say that one game is better than the other, as they are entirely different games, and different games for different people. That said, I'm going to get STALKER as well, as I really enjoy dismal places. :P
Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#25 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
Both are great and unique games, but FEAR wins hands down. It was just a lot better in regards to graphics (for it's time), stability, gameplay and polish.
Avatar image for ardylicious
ardylicious

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ardylicious
Member since 2004 • 1107 Posts
[QUOTE="nutcrackr"]STALKER is the better game unless -you suck at games -you really like linear games -you aren't interested in choice/rpg elements

Hey those are all the attributes of a Console gamer. I would reserve my judgement as i am still playing striker. Buy both if its a purchase choice.
Avatar image for oOreVenOo
oOreVenOo

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 oOreVenOo
Member since 2007 • 89 Posts
[QUOTE="alexr"] S.T.A.L.K.E.R. kills F.E.A.R. defenetily! Have fun!

FEAR and STALKER are two diffrents game, they cant be comparison. Stalker is a very good game also FEAR is good.
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#28 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

FEAR has better graphics, game play, weapons, and AI. Stalker has a better environment and weather and is very cool because they recreated the real Chernobyl area with many of the real buildings and object recreated almost verbatim.

basersx

 

FEAR doesn't have better graphics. The gameplay is decent, but it's way way too linear and the environments are way too constricted. Also Stalker definately has better weapons, the weapons in F.E.A.R didn't have much variety either. AI in Stalker is also good, you need to bare in mind the size of the environment. The larger the space, the more the AI has to work with. 

Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#29 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
[QUOTE="basersx"]

FEAR has better graphics, game play, weapons, and AI. Stalker has a better environment and weather and is very cool because they recreated the real Chernobyl area with many of the real buildings and object recreated almost verbatim.

-Unreal-

FEAR doesn't have better graphics. The gameplay is decent, but it's way way too linear and the environments are way too constricted. Also Stalker definately has better weapons, the weapons in F.E.A.R didn't have much variety either. AI in Stalker is also good, you need to bare in mind the size of the environment. The larger the space, the more the AI has to work with.

When compared that FEAR came out in 2005 and STALKER in 2007, FEAR has better graphics. Maybe not when compared to STALKER itself, but for it's time, it was pretty much unrivaled (except maybe by HL2). STALKER on the other hand, while good looking, is nowhere near the cream of the crop when it came out.
Avatar image for lazzy102
lazzy102

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 lazzy102
Member since 2004 • 455 Posts

FEAR has better graphics, game play, weapons, and AI.  Stalker has a better environment and weather and is very cool because they recreated the real Chernobyl area with many of the real buildings and object recreated almost verbatim.

basersx
mhhh...better the graphics are almost the same..i play both games at the highest settings..and they look similar.....i would go with stalker if you have a powerful computer...because at high settings it looks great and sounds.. great..plus with the new patch..there are fewer bugs..if you dont have a powerfull computer go with fear you can run it at high settings.. just with a radeon x800... 1 gb ram..^^
Avatar image for firebreathing
firebreathing

4619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 firebreathing
Member since 2005 • 4619 Posts
Depends what style of first-person shooter you like. In my opinion STALKER is much better and a game with some real emotion and intrigue. FEAR is fun when you just want to lose your mind and want to rip some bodies apart in slo-mo. They are both good at different things. Go with STALKER if you only have money for one, otherwise go with both!MIYAMOTOnext007
what he/she said >_>
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
only just started STALKER but so far i've liked FEAR better.
Avatar image for jokerdk
jokerdk

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 jokerdk
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts
Forget about FEAR, go out and get STALKER. Everything is much better, but you can not even compare this two. STALKER has much more to offer. There is no doubt, if you like the mix of Oblivion and lets say FEAR, you would not regret it. STALKER has better graphics, compared in underground levels. FEAR did not have any nature elements in it. Today, FEAR is just a computer game, but STALKER is as in real life, where there is no bounderies / borders (almost), where you leave though a story and become a serverb fighting mushine!  
Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#34 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
Forget about FEAR, go out and get STALKER. Everything is much better, but you can not even compare this two. STALKER has much more to offer. There is no doubt, if you like the mix of Oblivion and lets say FEAR, you would not regret it. STALKER has better graphics, compared in underground levels. FEAR did not have any nature elements in it. Today, FEAR is just a computer game, but STALKER is as in real life, where there is no bounderies / borders (almost), where you leave though a story and become a serverb fighting mushine! jokerdk
Wow, looks like we have THQ sales rep over here. Seriously, while STALKER is a great game, none of what you said made any sense. STALKER may have slightly better graphics, but that's not saying much when you're comparing it to a game released in 2005! Nature elements? What does this have to do with which is better? And if STALKER is just like real life, how come my life isn't buggy to the point of being unlivable? And my life doesn't crash every now and then? And my life isn't unoptimized, meaning I can live my life without getting constant glitches and slowdown? And STALKER is nothing like Oblivion, in fact, STALKER is a lot more constricted. Everywhere you go, you have barbed wire fences impeding your progress? If that's real life, where do you live? Riker's Island? In short, both are great games (and very different, which is why I don't understand why people compare the two), byt FEAR was just a lot better overall. And at least you could play it...
Avatar image for tsb247
tsb247

1373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 tsb247
Member since 2004 • 1373 Posts
I don't feel that it is fair to compare the two.  While F.E.A.R. is great, it's not the same style of gameplay as S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#36 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
STALKER wins hands down. Fear did combat slightly better but that's about it.
Avatar image for A-S_FM
A-S_FM

2208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#37 A-S_FM
Member since 2004 • 2208 Posts

f.e.a.r has perfect combat - but that's all the game is, it's as one note as a game can get, combat combat combat - everything about the game is oriented towards combat, and while there's those 'horror' interludes, they hardly amount to much more than taking a breather bewteen fights

while stalker is crazy diverse, it's a roleplaying (that is, quests + items, not role playing) and shooter with the emphasis on surviving more than killing, with as much exploration as combat

while they're both fps games, comparing them is like comparing escape from butcher bay with escape from monkey island - totally, totally different, that the perspective is the same means nothing - or, at least, should mean nothing

fear has far, far richer combat - stalker has a more immersive world

fear has better lighting - stalker has better shadows

fear has, uh, alma - stalker has a x5 lifespan

but in the end, if you're gonna compare games, it's not the component elements you compare, it's the overall experience you - not experience as you play - but the experience you reflect upon after you play... and which is better?

neither, too different to compare 

Avatar image for Erlkoenig
Erlkoenig

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Erlkoenig
Member since 2006 • 715 Posts
[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="basersx"]

FEAR has better graphics, game play, weapons, and AI. Stalker has a better environment and weather and is very cool because they recreated the real Chernobyl area with many of the real buildings and object recreated almost verbatim.

monco59

FEAR doesn't have better graphics. The gameplay is decent, but it's way way too linear and the environments are way too constricted. Also Stalker definately has better weapons, the weapons in F.E.A.R didn't have much variety either. AI in Stalker is also good, you need to bare in mind the size of the environment. The larger the space, the more the AI has to work with.

When compared that FEAR came out in 2005 and STALKER in 2007, FEAR has better graphics. Maybe not when compared to STALKER itself, but for it's time, it was pretty much unrivaled (except maybe by HL2). STALKER on the other hand, while good looking, is nowhere near the cream of the crop when it came out.

It doesn't matter if FEAR's graphics was better in 2005. That's what the scores are for, and I'm sure the OP can check that. Right now he's determining which game to get, and it makes perfect sense to compare the graphics of the 2.