Frontlines Fuel of War for 7.5$ on Steam

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
How is this game? Should I get it for 7.5$ on Steam?
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Well something like battlefield bad company in singleplayer. Try to think it as cod4 but with less weapons and bigger maps with vehicles. The sp is pretty short but its ok. Multiplayer? Well i think its dead. If i was you i would get it right away for that price.
Avatar image for Aslyum_Beast
Aslyum_Beast

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Aslyum_Beast
Member since 2008 • 975 Posts

Don't get it. Go to starbucks and get something nicer.

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
Well something like battlefield bad company in singleplayer. Try to think it as cod4 but with less weapons and bigger maps with vehicles. The sp is pretty short but its ok. Multiplayer? Well i think its dead. If i was you i would get it right away for that price.dakan45
You mean it has instant action like BF? How are the graphics?
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Multiplayer is dead and the singleplayer sucks, so considering the quality of the game, it's 3.5$ too much.

Better spend your money on some indie game that deserves 7.5$.

Avatar image for Lucifericus
Lucifericus

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Lucifericus
Member since 2009 • 363 Posts

Do not buy this game.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well something like battlefield bad company in singleplayer. Try to think it as cod4 but with less weapons and bigger maps with vehicles. The sp is pretty short but its ok. Multiplayer? Well i think its dead. If i was you i would get it right away for that price.gigatrainer
You mean it has instant action like BF? How are the graphics?

Graphics were pretty damn good for its time. No i dont mean you can play with bots. I mean it has singleplayer compaign with story and missions and all.
Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

its a great game- you should not think to much about what some folks say- many crap on most all of these fps games period- go thread to thread crapping on fps games- id bet money they have never even played the games-say every last 1 of them are crap- and you can look at their avy or sig and see they are more less into other genre games to start with- they are more into games like wow rpg type games and just post and say a game is crap just to post or have something to do or just to hear them selves talk.. go thread to thread with the same junk- go buy coffee or what ever- gs should ban these folks- they are like smart mouth kids trying to act cute or hard- gs really should ban them..

ffow its sp is a lil short but has 2 added maps you can play when you finish the campaign- it is fun and looks nice its use of the ut3 engine is better than it is in the ut3 game- it has rc drones and tanks and is not a bad game- i dont play mp- this game like all the others was hacked and cheated its very first day on line and was well complained about- so- i dont care that mp sucked- i think all mp games should be shut down- few playing them are honest.

but my 1 complaint about ffow is the sighting system its a lil odd and takes a lil getting use too- you will not hit what you aim at unless the site glows red- oh ya it has check points and not quick saves [if i remember right]- i really hate check points games my self- is ffow the best game god ever made no- is any no- all of them have its faults period- but it runs like a top out of the box and is not buggy crap- that says a lot too- but if ffow is cheap- yes you should buy play and hopefully enjoy it..

see ya..

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I am really starting to like this guy ^^ :)
Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

who dat dakan :P :D

1 of my ffow videos..>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNfVjZ2sEVw&feature=PlayList&p=5A00F568E794865E

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Not one of the most epic parts of the compaign but its a nice tank mission. The village or the city got to be my favorites...no i am not talking about the bonus levels.
Avatar image for lambalot
lambalot

1798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 lambalot
Member since 2004 • 1798 Posts

got this game last christmas for a massive 98p (about $1.60) lol. It was ok, played through SP then left it, didnt bother downloading any patches to try MP.

Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

its been a year or so since i played it last- i did a video walk/ play through but have not uploaded all of them yet- i have some videos that need to be edited- and playing these games with check points and cant just save where or when you want is a bit more hard to record- if you stop playing videos dont seem to start where you stopped in the last so you might have to trim a lil etc.

so i cant remeber all the level names- i like the level just after this the tank battle and nukes going off is cool- and other levels too- the extra levels are fun too.. but i really like the drones in the game- they make ffow different- its the first and only games ive played that has them- they are a nice touch i think.

when or if i install this w7 hp upgrade i have i might just install and play again and start my video play through over again- i will have more memory and all so maxing it out should be no prob- i think my last vids i had to lower shadows a lil. but just for added performance while trying to record while playing and not have lag etc- if not recording i can max settings and res too- i can max settings and res in most all my games if just playing and @ 1600x1200 85hrz but recording i drop to 1024x768 75hrz which is my dtop res. text etc is a lil larger and more easy for my getting old eyes to see- 48 last month- i can see fine- but small text and on packages etc are getting hard to see- so i have either a magni glass or now some drug store reading glasses for that lil stuff- im just glad i still have my old sweet crt and can lower res and still have great graphics-

i hope i never have to downgrade to lcd and extra high crap native res that i cant lower if i want and it still look nice- i think lcd's are the biggest rip off in the resent past- and i laugh so hard when silly fools cry he cant max out his game and is running some stupid extra large extra high res lcd- and then wonder why- its because they dont have enough system to push them high res in high resource games-- but their systems are fine a dandy for glorified surfing or viewing video- they never seem to understand playing games is different-and then you need a fast lcd for gaming 2ms so no or lil ghosting but then normal use sucks- or get the best for normal use and gaming sucks- and i do not like wide screen either- im sad tho- when my crt dies i cant buy them any more like talking about it- i will be stuck with a crap lcd.well and have to save money for it- but i think id get none wide 1280x1024 and have plenty of system left over for recording my games with everything maxed out. common sense stuff..

Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

dude stay away from this game.. i bought this game at launch. talk about disappointment.... first the campaign isn't very good...although the plot seems very interesting..they dont really make a good sp experience..the aiming in this game is horrible..here ill let a pc gaming review site explain this

"the aiming system and the actual firing of the weapons themselves are "off". It's difficult, for example, to aim and shoot a moving opponent, while you're standing still and that, frankly, isn't exactly a difficult thing to accomplish with a decent mouse and an above-average frame rate. For some reason or another, the crosshair "floats" around the screen, and the majority of the weapons suffer from a very annoying recoil effect when fired. It's not fun, and if the shooting part in a first-person shooter isn't fun it's _bad_. There's also the lack of "punch" when you fire. You don't feel like wielding a deadly weapon in World War 3, because the actual feeling would be more at home in a Paintball court. The sounds associated with the firing part aren't very convincing, and the enemies receiving the bullet aren't very well animated, either. Not even the sniper rifle is different. You shoot it, you hit the guy, and he doesn't die. It's annoying. There's no way to kill anyone in this game with a single shot, unless the bullet goes right through his head, which isn't exactly easy, due to the aiming system described a bit earlier."

on top of that..the mp is dead... there is no voip in game... its very buggy...no joystick support... waste of $50 bucks for me.. trust me STAY AWAY!!

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#15 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Pfff stupid review, the aiming is meant to be like that in order to have are reallistic recoil system, not many games do that. As fo the sounds? Well neither the sounds in reallistic games like arma 2 or raven shield feel like it, but they are pretty much the same. The weapons dont do high damage because you need more hitpoints to survive in sp. I played far more "annoying" games that you have to shoot someone too many times. Also whats wrong with the framerate? I maxed out the game with 8600 gt and a dual core 2.6ghz cpu. I experianced 0 bugs in singleplayer.
Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

Pfff stupid review, the aiming is meant to be like that in order to have are reallistic recoil system, not many games do that. As fo the sounds? Well neither the sounds in reallistic games like arma 2 or raven shield feel like it, but they are pretty much the same. The weapons dont do high damage because you need more hitpoints to survive in sp. I played far more "annoying" games that you have to shoot someone too many times. Also whats wrong with the framerate? I maxed out the game with 8600 gt and a dual core 2.6ghz cpu. I experianced 0 bugs in singleplayer.dakan45

o u didnt like that review ok then heres more:

60 gamespy

Touching again on the controls and gameplay, we noticed that the PC version of Frontlines: Fuel of War introduces a more exaggerated recoil effect that gives the game an altogether different feel from the Xbox 360 version. The console version has minimal recoil, and you can toggle a slight auto-aim functionality to assist those who lack precision with FPS controls. The PC version's recoil feels like overcompensation, crossing the threshold of balance and moving into unfriendly territory for the sake of realism. The heavy machine gun, for example, is deadly in the console version yet very difficult to control when playing on a PC

73 Game Informer

Frontlines does enough to entertain on the multiplayer end to make up for the woeful single-player experience. It's a shame Kaos didn't scrap the single-player altogether to focus completely on honing the online experience.Too bad the MP is dead

as for the gamespot review..they never reviewed it..its a known fact that the aiming in the pc version is broken or way off..

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

o u didnt like that review ok then heres more:

60 gamespy

Touching again on the controls and gameplay, we noticed that the PC version of Frontlines: Fuel of War introduces a more exaggerated recoil effect that gives the game an altogether different feel from the Xbox 360 version. The console version has minimal recoil, and you can toggle a slight auto-aim functionality to assist those who lack precision with FPS controls. The PC version's recoil feels like overcompensation, crossing the threshold of balance and moving into unfriendly territory for the sake of realism. The heavy machine gun, for example, is deadly in the console version yet very difficult to control when playing on a PC

73 Game Informer

Frontlines does enough to entertain on the multiplayer end to make up for the woeful single-player experience. It's a shame Kaos didn't scrap the single-player altogether to focus completely on honing the online experience.Too bad the MP is dead

as for the gamespot review..they never reviewed it..its a known fact that the aiming in the pc version is broken or way off..

devious742

Hey whats wrong i thought pc gamers like their games not to be dumbed down but with unfairly harder gameplay mechanics in order to provide a better gameplay experiance on the pc :D

Also sp was actually good considering it was mainly a multiplayer game, eg compared to l4d the singleplayer is much better.

Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

[QUOTE="devious742"]

o u didnt like that review ok then heres more:

60 gamespy

Touching again on the controls and gameplay, we noticed that the PC version of Frontlines: Fuel of War introduces a more exaggerated recoil effect that gives the game an altogether different feel from the Xbox 360 version. The console version has minimal recoil, and you can toggle a slight auto-aim functionality to assist those who lack precision with FPS controls. The PC version's recoil feels like overcompensation, crossing the threshold of balance and moving into unfriendly territory for the sake of realism. The heavy machine gun, for example, is deadly in the console version yet very difficult to control when playing on a PC

73 Game Informer

Frontlines does enough to entertain on the multiplayer end to make up for the woeful single-player experience. It's a shame Kaos didn't scrap the single-player altogether to focus completely on honing the online experience.Too bad the MP is dead

as for the gamespot review..they never reviewed it..its a known fact that the aiming in the pc version is broken or way off..

dakan45

Hey whats wrong i thought pc gamers like their games not to be dumbed down but with unfairly harder gameplay mechanics in order to provide a better gameplay experiance on the pc :D

Also sp was actually good considering it was mainly a multiplayer game, eg compared to l4d the singleplayer is much better.

the way those weapons handle..they over did it with recoil.. aiming and shooting at someone in arma 2 is a breeze compared to this game..

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Funny, i ussually complain about the way health goes down in stalker clear sky and how weapons are weak but i actually find far cry 2 and FFOW fun and challenging!!!
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Game sucks. Spend that money on anything else.
Avatar image for chapman86
chapman86

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 chapman86
Member since 2004 • 583 Posts

there are less than 30 people playing this on multiplayer total.

7.5 should have been its original price without -75% off.

Avatar image for nikola96
nikola96

836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 nikola96
Member since 2008 • 836 Posts

Do not buy this game.

Lucifericus

This.

Avatar image for AciDiCa-
AciDiCa-

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 AciDiCa-
Member since 2009 • 359 Posts

Purchased the game on Steam for 2.50 euro, installed it, couldn't play single player because of constant crashes during the loading screen, tried the multiplayer, got bored & confused, uninstalled the game.

Verdict. Do not buy this game.

Avatar image for Lucifericus
Lucifericus

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Lucifericus
Member since 2009 • 363 Posts

its been a year or so since i played it last- i did a video walk/ play through but have not uploaded all of them yet- i have some videos that need to be edited- and playing these games with check points and cant just save where or when you want is a bit more hard to record- if you stop playing videos dont seem to start where you stopped in the last so you might have to trim a lil etc.

so i cant remeber all the level names- i like the level just after this the tank battle and nukes going off is cool- and other levels too- the extra levels are fun too.. but i really like the drones in the game- they make ffow different- its the first and only games ive played that has them- they are a nice touch i think.

when or if i install this w7 hp upgrade i have i might just install and play again and start my video play through over again- i will have more memory and all so maxing it out should be no prob- i think my last vids i had to lower shadows a lil. but just for added performance while trying to record while playing and not have lag etc- if not recording i can max settings and res too- i can max settings and res in most all my games if just playing and @ 1600x1200 85hrz but recording i drop to 1024x768 75hrz which is my dtop res. text etc is a lil larger and more easy for my getting old eyes to see- 48 last month- i can see fine- but small text and on packages etc are getting hard to see- so i have either a magni glass or now some drug store reading glasses for that lil stuff- im just glad i still have my old sweet crt and can lower res and still have great graphics-

i hope i never have to downgrade to lcd and extra high crap native res that i cant lower if i want and it still look nice- i think lcd's are the biggest rip off in the resent past- and i laugh so hard when silly fools cry he cant max out his game and is running some stupid extra large extra high res lcd- and then wonder why- its because they dont have enough system to push them high res in high resource games-- but their systems are fine a dandy for glorified surfing or viewing video- they never seem to understand playing games is different-and then you need a fast lcd for gaming 2ms so no or lil ghosting but then normal use sucks- or get the best for normal use and gaming sucks- and i do not like wide screen either- im sad tho- when my crt dies i cant buy them any more like talking about it- i will be stuck with a crap lcd.well and have to save money for it- but i think id get none wide 1280x1024 and have plenty of system left over for recording my games with everything maxed out. common sense stuff..

eht
Man I hate it when people have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.
Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

ha ha maybe if you type more than just 1 line and lil more detail as to what you are talking about- well folks would know what you are talking about- because only you know-

my guess is and is just a guess- you dont like what i said about lcd's- i guess because lcd's are said new tech- you feel my opinion is wrong or something- well i hate to tell ya- but new dont mean better or best- and as said- its many poor fools trying to push more high res in gaming than his system can truly handle. and lcd's are way more limited. and will add this- to each his own..

Avatar image for Lucifericus
Lucifericus

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Lucifericus
Member since 2009 • 363 Posts

ha ha maybe if you type more than just 1 line and lil more detail as to what you are talking about- well folks would know what you are talking about- because only you know-

eht

Alright, you asked for it. "- i think lcd's are the biggest rip off in the resent past-"

Regardless of what you may think, LCDs are better in many ways.
-Sharper
-Brighter
-Rich Colors
-Reduced eye strain (No Screen Flickering, ever)
-No radiation
-No Scan lines
-Thinner, weigh less
-Put out much less heat than CRT
-Less power consumption

Plus they are really cheap, there's no reason to get a CRT over an LCD these days...

"and i laugh so hard when silly fools cry he cant max out his game and is running some stupid extra large extra high res lcd"

Well that fool probably shouldn't have bought a crappy video card to begin with. If you're going to be pushing resolutions like 1920x1080, at the minimum get an 9800/8800 or 4850. My 8800GT handles most games at 1920x1080 with over 60fps, hell even my 8800gts 640mb did 1920x1080. I even play Crysis at 1920x1080 (medium), runs good, looks good.

"then you need a fast lcd for gaming 2ms so no or lil ghosting but then normal use sucks"

No, no, no. You absolutely don't need 2ms if you want to avoid ghosting. My monitor is 6ms I have noticed no ghosting what so ever, just do some research before you buy...

"and i do not like wide screen either"

Well, I can't help you there. But Widescreen is better for most people. Much better field of view.


Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

well- you pretty much ignored every thing i said just to make your point and only real point you made is- lcd's are more energy efficient and that is all you said that is credible- and as a fact i do read maybe you should read more- and i have pro gamer friends too- and you are wrong and you can still have ghosting even with a 2ms lcd- so that is just poop- dont know how you just make that up- as a fact many many people still prefer crt over lcd and for gaming- tho for lan parties etc the lcd is more convenient to carry around- the greatest problem is crt's have been pushed out and are not made any more for a said better lcd which is not- they are mostly hype- and i repeat 1 of the greatest rip offs in the resent past- and as i said- you have to pick either the best lcd for gaming or best for normal desk top use.

you skipped around dance spin twist the fact i said- many people cry because they cant max out his res while playing and what did you say exactly- you play crysis at medium- and made my point for me- ha ha you on 1 hand say same as i did fools did not buy as powerful enough hard ware thats needed- and then say you have to play at medium quailty- but because you are talking its good for you and you are smart or something- when you are of the same silly folks we both are talking about- so make your mind up man. maybe you just talk to here your self talk or something. and as i said- lcd's have native res if you go and lower it which you can- well your graphics quality goes to crap- as to being more sharp or more rich color well- that goes to lcd quality and or them that own them and his ability to proper tune it- and can be job all in its self and then some folks are cock eyed and or color blind and the next lcd looks a lot better- eye strain etc well i can up or lower hrz and have no real eye strain-

my main point was is- my cry is more flexible other than having to carry it around- as a fact lcd's make better tv's than do monitors- and i repeat they are better at glorified surfing or viewing video than they are for gaming- you can think or twist or spin facts any way you care to- but the only real advantages LCD have over CRT and gaming is less weight and less energy- you can push hype and think because LCD is more new tech its better- but that is more opinion versus fact- the only real fact is- your LCD uses less energy than my CRT.

i will also repeat- to each his own- as to his own taste or fake tree hugger gloable warming junk what ever- be happy with your LCD- i hope i am never Forced to use them- because that is what it will be- Forced on me..

ha ha wide screen has better view- well better view side to side- i have better view top to bottom. again a matter of tastes or opinions..

see ya..

-Sharper
-Brighter
-Rich Colors
-Reduced eye strain (No Screen Flickering, ever)
-No radiation
-No Scan lines
-Thinner, weigh less
-Put out much less heat than CRT
-Less power consumption

Avatar image for Lucifericus
Lucifericus

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Lucifericus
Member since 2009 • 363 Posts
CRTs aren't better for gaming. The end.
Avatar image for flipin_jackass
flipin_jackass

9772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 flipin_jackass
Member since 2004 • 9772 Posts
the sp was fun... but for $7... lol, just wait for the next THQ pack and hope it's there...
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

its a great game- you should not think to much about what some folks say- many crap on most all of these fps games period- go thread to thread crapping on fps games- id bet money they have never even played the games-say every last 1 of them are crap- and you can look at their avy or sig and see they are more less into other genre games to start with- they are more into games like wow rpg type games and just post and say a game is crap just to post or have something to do or just to hear them selves talk.. go thread to thread with the same junk- go buy coffee or what ever- gs should ban these folks- they are like smart mouth kids trying to act cute or hard- gs really should ban them..

ffow its sp is a lil short but has 2 added maps you can play when you finish the campaign- it is fun and looks nice its use of the ut3 engine is better than it is in the ut3 game- it has rc drones and tanks and is not a bad game- i dont play mp- this game like all the others was hacked and cheated its very first day on line and was well complained about- so- i dont care that mp sucked- i think all mp games should be shut down- few playing them are honest.

but my 1 complaint about ffow is the sighting system its a lil odd and takes a lil getting use too- you will not hit what you aim at unless the site glows red- oh ya it has check points and not quick saves [if i remember right]- i really hate check points games my self- is ffow the best game god ever made no- is any no- all of them have its faults period- but it runs like a top out of the box and is not buggy crap- that says a lot too- but if ffow is cheap- yes you should buy play and hopefully enjoy it..

see ya..

eht

God your posts make you want to scream, what's with all the " - "? Just make sentences not pauses, or a sentence that is within a sentence that is also withing a sentence, etc.

1) If it's great, then why is it so great? there is nothing, absolutely nothing that this game does "decent", they failed even with the graphics, it looks a lot worse than any UE 3 game.

2) He asked for our opinion, so if you do bot know what opinion is, you might want to look that up into a dictionary or simply "google it". Asking for an opinion = wanting to hear what other people think about "XYZ".

3) Many FPSs are crap, because we get hundreds every year and most of them aren't even worth mentioning, of course people will bash games that are crap.

4) Go official forums, they don't even like it. Oh right, it's dead anyway.

5) How much money did you bet? I finished the campaign and online I played for 2 days or so, around 10 hours, half of which were races with drones...yes, sorry, I forgot about this...this is what they did "decently", the drones, racing with the drones is pretty fun. Expecting news on that funny "bet" of yours ;) assumption doesn't work great, just a little hint for your next "bets".

6) My avatar has nothing to do with anything, yes I like anime and I hate JRPGs, most of them, some I like. Yep you "showed" me :(. And yes I'm not really into FPSs, I don't care about mediocre ones, ones that might of, and the ones that plain suck (nobody cares about them, but apparently you do), I only like good ones, or fun ones.

7) Again what does WoW have to do with anything...are you a...troll? Yeah I love RPGs, it's my favorite genre, but you know, people actually play multiple genres, I know, it shocked me too and of course I'll post "XYZ" game is crap if it really is, and frankly this is pretty much the worst game you can find on Steam. Another thing that might shock you, I don't go in "every" thread to say that "ffow" or w/e game is crap and since the game is crap, nobody plays it, nobody cares about it, this is, iirc, the 3rd or 4th thread we had about ffow in the last year.

8 ) Thank you very much, but I don't drink coffee.

9) GS should ban us because we have an opinion that is different from yours? here's where you're mistaken, you should be banned if you can't carry a discussion and you dismiss anything that doesn't please you.

10) Again with the assumptions, no I'm not a kid.

11) You should really look up the word "opinion" or/and "respect".

12) (your opinion about the game) and now I "respectfully" doubt you played UT3 (I'm not omg, this guy should be banned, he's a kid, he never even played the game, go out, omg) if you actually think FFoW looks remotely as detailed or "solid" as UT3, but this is opinion based, you might like the art style more.

13) Of course you don't play mp, what's the use to play agains bots and call it multiplayer?

14) You should care because i's what the game was all about, the campaign was just a tutorial.

15) All games that have multiplayer have it for a reason, and there are games that are very good, if you're too lazy to check for protected servers or just find one of the thousands servers for various games that never had/don't have/will probably never have hackers/cheaters, then you should comment.

16) Again with assumptions...there are honest people you know, but you being a kid and all yeah, you cheating might result in people not being honest or calm (yep I made two assumptions here, first one is with you being a kid, because of your writing style and 2nd, cheating and such, or where they..? hmm)

17) Yep some good stuff there but you blew it with the end, you don't need to spend even 7.5$ on a game if it's not worth it at all.

Read all your posts in the thread and since you complained about not writing enough, here you go, I wrote enough, so have fun ;).

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Jeez what did eht ever do to you two?
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Jeez what did eht ever do to you two?dakan45
Nothing except basically calling us trolls and that he is without a doubt right and the only one with the right to an opinion, and he did nothing, we just discussed ;), having counterarguments isn't doing something to a person, is making a discussion. That's why we're here...but maybe you have other reasons?
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Jeez what did eht ever do to you two?DanielDust
Nothing except basically calling us trolls and that he is without a doubt right and the only one with the right to an opinion, and he did nothing, we just discussed ;), having counterarguments isn't doing something to a person, is making a discussion. That's why we're here...but maybe you have other reasons?

Ok, i ll be leaving now and leave you guys to your discussion, just dont annoy each other too much, its not polite.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Dude delete that message it can get you moderated....seriously.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

It seems you don't understand English at all, even if you are able to somehow write. I said absolutely nothing offensive and your reaction just proves that you're just a kid that thinks he's an internet tough guy.

Anyway TC, you judge his reaction, and the other posts in this thread, then you will get the obvious answer. The game is not worth it even at that price.

Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

ha ha im laughing so hard- you personally attack me. make it personal and then try and spin it- i was giving the man my opinion and i think its a ok great game what ever- and i stated fact or it seems many folks go from thread to thread just to trash games-

you pop a gasket and attack me- and for the record- im 48 years old- i speak my mind- but i didnt attack you- but i for sure here as i would on the street will defend my self.. if im wrong well im sorry- but its you trying to be big shot not me..

and 1 more thing ut3 is 1 of the most god ugly games- it might as well be only black and white- all the color it does have is black and multi shades of grey and rock with a few colors splashed in- the skins are butt ugly too. tho ya vehicles and water fx are cool- lets not talk about over size gawky players and poor movement or silly looking guns and the fact they messed up the flack cannon and you pretty much have to aim at the belt to hit them in the head and is worst on some maps. and it has only few mod skins and maps too or maps worth a crap-but ut04 is 10x the game ut3 is-

and thats just my opinion too- so flame and personally attack me for that too will ya- maybe

seems to me- the only opinion that matters here in this or maybe all the threads here is only your opinion- maybe we others should just delete all our posts here in the forums and just let you speak- because you dont like the game- well thats all that matters any way- right? or you will attack any 1 else with an opinion right? ha ha maybe you can correct my spelling and grammar or teach me how to type or something- ha ha- its comical- you should proof yours. lmao.

miss - man- what ever- talk to your self- i will ig ya.

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
Oh please shut up and stop your argument, everyone is entitled for their own opinion but that does not mean you will go and attack everyone else. I am not getting this game as I more or less found it to be crap. @eht - You actually started it by calling all others by name, so please stop it.
Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#40 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts
Don't get it. Unless it's one dollar...
Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

i called who by name- i didnt do anything wrong. gees- i will make it easy for you lifers- 25 million posts- which i think is what this is all about and how you guys can just jump my butt because you feel like it- i will not bother or post here again- i will leave it to you ladies.

i have my profile page and game info and patches etc. i will not tread in you 2 or 3's forums- you can have it..

ha ha the other attacks me because i say i hope i never have to buy a lcd- but i guess you lifers spin that too-say i attacked him too right.. ha ha i was not even talking to him ro start with.. oops kill me because i dont want a freaken lcd- you folks are comical- i will not post again- you win-

ha ha see ya- enjoy..

Avatar image for gigatrainer
gigatrainer

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gigatrainer
Member since 2006 • 2029 Posts
K, you asked for it

its a great game- you should not think to much about what some folks say- many crap on most all of these fps games period- go thread to thread crapping on fps games- id bet money they have never even played the games-say every last 1 of them are crap- and you can look at their avy or sig and see they are more less into other genre games to start with- they are more into games like wow rpg type games and just post and say a game is crap just to post or have something to do or just to hear them selves talk.. go thread to thread with the same junk- go buy coffee or what ever- gs should ban these folks- they are like smart mouth kids trying to act cute or hard- gs really should ban them..

That was your first post in this thread.

i hope i never have to downgrade to lcd and extra high crap native res that i cant lower if i want and it still look nice- i think lcd's are the biggest rip off in the resent past- and i laugh so hard when silly fools cry he cant max out his game and is running some stupid extra large extra high res lcd

Silly fools you say? You are basically cursing everyone who use a LCD with a resolution of more than 1024 x 768 in that post of yours. Do I actually need to explain this?
Avatar image for eht
eht

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 eht
Member since 2005 • 164 Posts

ha ha again general statement- people seem to go thread to thread trashing fps games- period-

as for what i said about lcd's you read or take it how you want to take it- and out of context and spin it- i said [[[[[[[ fools dont have enough system to push the high res or their lcd's and cry because he cant run his games maxed out ]]]]]]]]]]]- again- you folks spin things to your liking and personally attack me- i never posted you so and so [tom dick or harry period] this that or the other-- but you others did do that to me..

i also said [[[[[[[[ i can max out most all my games at 1600x1200 85hrz but when recording i run them at my dtop res 1024x1024 75hrz ]]]]]]]] again- you folks pick what words or sentence you care to and spin what ever you want just to have something to talk about and to personally attack me. ha ha correct my spelling or grammar like you are my mother or teacher or something- like you are some body.

you folks are getting on my nerves- its truly comical- you can have these freaken forums- you think you own them any way- i will not post again..

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#44 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="chapman86"]

there are less than 30 people playing this on multiplayer total.

7.5 should have been its original price without -75% off.

:( That sucks. I was pretty interested in this.
Avatar image for Gammit10
Gammit10

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 119

User Lists: 2

#45 Gammit10
Member since 2004 • 2397 Posts
Isn't there a demo?
Avatar image for shred
shred

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 shred
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts

You will get mixed reactions to this game from the members here. Personally, I enjoyed the game quite a bit, as I thought the game had good graphics, game mechanics, and storyline. I noticed some other members here stated it is basically like a multiplayer game being played in single player mode. Well, this just isn't true, as the game has a storyline and objectives that have to be completed. For $7.50 I can't see where you can go wrong with this game.