Future of gaming motherboards?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts
Does anyone have any information reguarding the next step in gaming motherboards? My current favorites are the nforce 680a and 680i. I am sure new motherboards will support DDR3 memory and such but what is the future? PCIE faster then 8GB/s (x32)?
Avatar image for JN_Fenrir
JN_Fenrir

1551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 JN_Fenrir
Member since 2004 • 1551 Posts
Hopefully, they'll start moving towards a more unified relationship between GPU and CPU. It looks like Microsoft is already trying to get that ball rolling on the software side with Vista and DirectX 10, but the hardware market really needs to follow suit in order for it to provide any meaningful improvements in performance. Multi-core CPUs are finally in the mainstream, but no interface yet exists to put them to good use. I think the revolution starts there. The current architecture of computers still presents far too many bottlenecks and limitations to truly be "next gen" when it comes to gaming. The console guys are definitely a few steps ahead at this point, but they are limited by the amount of money that the more casual-gaming console crowd are willing to pay for hardware, and as a result, you end up with failed junk like the Cell processor. Think about it: seven cores for $599? Wow. That's some trick. And still, no one would exactly consider the PS3 to be "cheap". It's a marvelous system, ain't it? Yeah, so marvelous, in fact, that all the game developers are just sitting there marvelling at it. Oh, and I think SLI is the most ridiculous idea the market has ever produced. "Interesting. It seems our GPU is capable of processing ten times more data than these games are throwing at it, and yet they still don't run nearly as well as we thought they would.""Hmm, that is surely odd. Say, what if we had two of them?" :|
Avatar image for -SaI
-SaI

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -SaI
Member since 2006 • 401 Posts

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing scheme

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing scheme-SaI

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

Avatar image for -SaI
-SaI

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -SaI
Member since 2006 • 401 Posts
[QUOTE="-SaI"]

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing schemeJAMullins

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

like that fatal1ty POS that abit trys market to ppl?

what features would make a mobo "gaming?"

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

Avatar image for blacksorrow07
blacksorrow07

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 blacksorrow07
Member since 2007 • 263 Posts

lol... the "Gaming Motherboard". IMO, there is no gaming motherboard.

Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

lol... the "Gaming Motherboard". IMO, there is no gaming motherboard.

blacksorrow07

So you would get a 680i for microsoft word?

Avatar image for -SaI
-SaI

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -SaI
Member since 2006 • 401 Posts

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

JAMullins

right now p35 boards are faster than 680, so have the old 975X boards

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

JAMullins

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="blacksorrow07"]

lol... the "Gaming Motherboard". IMO, there is no gaming motherboard.

_SKatEDiRt_

So you would get a 680i for microsoft word?

The only reason why i would go with the 680i, would be for SLI.

Avatar image for blacksorrow07
blacksorrow07

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 blacksorrow07
Member since 2007 • 263 Posts
[QUOTE="_SKatEDiRt_"][QUOTE="blacksorrow07"]

lol... the "Gaming Motherboard". IMO, there is no gaming motherboard.

Bebi_vegeta

So you would get a 680i for microsoft word?

The only reason why i would go with the 680i, would be for SLI.

same here

Avatar image for evilbarbarian
evilbarbarian

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 evilbarbarian
Member since 2005 • 3883 Posts

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

umm overclocking options.

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

Bebi_vegeta

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

Go to TomsHardware.com and read the reviews for motherboards. Why do they have different numbers in the performance comparison?

Avatar image for skinnypete91
skinnypete91

6022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 skinnypete91
Member since 2006 • 6022 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

JAMullins

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

I agree lol

If all motherboards were the same then why are there so many out there?

With different prices features etc...

Avatar image for -SaI
-SaI

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 -SaI
Member since 2006 • 401 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

JAMullins

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

Go to TomsHardware.com and read the reviews for motherboards. Why do they have different numbers in the performance comparison?

wow, you still go to TH?

~_~ go to some other site that actualy care about performance, like XS or overclock.net

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#18 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

-SaI

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

Go to TomsHardware.com and read the reviews for motherboards. Why do they have different numbers in the performance comparison?

wow, you still go to TH?

~_~ go to some other site that actualy care about performance, like XS or overclock.net

Debating technique 42b: If you can't discredit the argument, discredit where it came from

It's blatantly obvious that motherboards affect performance. Go to practically ANY reliable site, and you'll see different ratings for different boards. It's just basic logic here.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

skinnypete91

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

I agree lol

If all motherboards were the same then why are there so many out there?

With different prices features etc...

You just said it, features!!!

Whats the difference between intel x975,965, and nvidia 680i? In performance wise gaming!

They change motherboard because of the processor, memory, front bus, video cards, hard drive have changed.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

JAMullins

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

Go to TomsHardware.com and read the reviews for motherboards. Why do they have different numbers in the performance comparison?

Ok, show me a benchmark please.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/22/680i_motherboard_comparison_part_2/page9.html

Oh wow, 5 frames difference...

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/12/21/680i-motherboard-comparison/page9.html

Yeah, alot of different performances...

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/12/19/intel_or_nvidia/page10.html

Yeah i look like a complete newb...

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/11/13/shootout_at_the_core_2_corral/page17.html

I'm I reading right?

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts
Bebi_vegeta settle down before you hurt yourself. Your words exactly "Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance." so if the numbers are different then does that make them the same. We are talking about motherboards in general. Why do motherboards have different price ranges? Why do they make new ones every year? and most importantly Why do you keep going on and on when you are WRONG? You are compairing very closely related motherboards. Go do me a favor and put an ASUS Striker Extreme against a MSI PM8M3-V. There is no chance "they all have the same performance". I am sure several people will back me...
Avatar image for Hot_Potato
Hot_Potato

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 Hot_Potato
Member since 2004 • 3422 Posts

Hopefully, they'll start moving towards a more unified relationship between GPU and CPU. It looks like Microsoft is already trying to get that ball rolling on the software side with Vista and DirectX 10, but the hardware market really needs to follow suit in order for it to provide any meaningful improvements in performance. Multi-core CPUs are finally in the mainstream, but no interface yet exists to put them to good use. I think the revolution starts there. The current architecture of computers still presents far too many bottlenecks and limitations to truly be "next gen" when it comes to gaming. The console guys are definitely a few steps ahead at this point, but they are limited by the amount of money that the more casual-gaming console crowd are willing to pay for hardware, and as a result, you end up with failed junk like the Cell processor. Think about it: seven cores for $599? Wow. That's some trick. And still, no one would exactly consider the PS3 to be "cheap". It's a marvelous system, ain't it? Yeah, so marvelous, in fact, that all the game developers are just sitting there marvelling at it. Oh, and I think SLI is the most ridiculous idea the market has ever produced. "Interesting. It seems our GPU is capable of processing ten times more data than these games are throwing at it, and yet they still don't run nearly as well as we thought they would.""Hmm, that is surely odd. Say, what if we had two of them?" :|JN_Fenrir

The cell is a SINGLE core processor with 7 SPEs, which are NOT cores.

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="-SaI"]

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing schemeJAMullins

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

1 or 2 extra frames for an extra cost of $100? :lol:

The guy's right--there's no such thing as a gaming motherboard.

Now, an overclocking friendly motherboard is another thing...

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="-SaI"]

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing schemeWesker776

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

1 or 2 extra frames for an extra cost of $100? :lol:

The guy's right--there's no such thing as a gaming motherboard.

Now, an overclocking friendly motherboard is another thing...

http://usa.asus.com/products1.aspx?l1=3 "Gaming Motherboards"

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

Bebi_vegeta settle down before you hurt yourself. Your words exactly "Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance." so if the numbers are different then does that make them the same. We are talking about motherboards in general. Why do motherboards have different price ranges? Why do they make new ones every year? and most importantly Why do you keep going on and on when you are WRONG? You are compairing very closely related motherboards. Go do me a favor and put an ASUS Striker Extreme against a MSI PM8M3-V. There is no chance "they all have the same performance". I am sure several people will back me... JAMullins

LOL you wanna know why?

Because each year or so a new product had been lunched, from procesors changing needing new socket, new chipset meaning faster front side to go with the processor and plenty of features, memory ddr to ddr3, video card pci, agp, pci-e and pci-e2.0 Also from SLI to crossfire, hard drive going to ata to sata... theres plenty of motherboard that are specific to a users needs.

And your comparing a micro atx motherboard ( that is old, with DDR memorie, AGP slot, ATA hard drive, with 800fbs) to a normal motherboard (1333fbs,ddr2,pci-e,sata,sli) ... comon get real!

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="-SaI"]

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing schemeJAMullins

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

1 or 2 extra frames for an extra cost of $100? :lol:

The guy's right--there's no such thing as a gaming motherboard.

Now, an overclocking friendly motherboard is another thing...

http://usa.asus.com/products1.aspx?l1=3 "Gaming Motherboards"

Synchronizing Web Database - Please check back later. Sorry for the inconvenience!

euhh that's great...

Avatar image for DarKre
DarKre

9529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 DarKre
Member since 2003 • 9529 Posts
Whatever ever happened to standardizing BTX form factor?
Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts

[QUOTE="JAMullins"]Bebi_vegeta settle down before you hurt yourself. Your words exactly "Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance." so if the numbers are different then does that make them the same. We are talking about motherboards in general. Why do motherboards have different price ranges? Why do they make new ones every year? and most importantly Why do you keep going on and on when you are WRONG? You are compairing very closely related motherboards. Go do me a favor and put an ASUS Striker Extreme against a MSI PM8M3-V. There is no chance "they all have the same performance". I am sure several people will back me... Bebi_vegeta

LOL you wanna know why?

Because each year or so a new product had been lunched, from procesors changing needing new socket, new chipset meaning faster front side to go with the processor and plenty of features, memory ddr to ddr3, video card pci, agp, pci-e and pci-e2.0 Also from SLI to crossfire, hard drive going to ata to sata... theres plenty of motherboard that are specific to a users needs.

And your comparing a micro atx motherboard ( that is old, with DDR memorie, AGP slot, ATA hard drive, with 800fbs) to a normal motherboard (1333fbs,ddr2,pci-e,sata,sli) ... comon get real!

You proved yourself wrong... Not all motherboards have the same performance... Thanks for wasting my time even more with your need to reply to everything...

Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts

Hopefully, they'll start moving towards a more unified relationship between GPU and CPU. It looks like Microsoft is already trying to get that ball rolling on the software side with Vista and DirectX 10, but the hardware market really needs to follow suit in order for it to provide any meaningful improvements in performance. Multi-core CPUs are finally in the mainstream, but no interface yet exists to put them to good use. I think the revolution starts there. The current architecture of computers still presents far too many bottlenecks and limitations to truly be "next gen" when it comes to gaming. The console guys are definitely a few steps ahead at this point, but they are limited by the amount of money that the more casual-gaming console crowd are willing to pay for hardware, and as a result, you end up with failed junk like the Cell processor. Think about it: seven cores for $599? Wow. That's some trick. And still, no one would exactly consider the PS3 to be "cheap". It's a marvelous system, ain't it? Yeah, so marvelous, in fact, that all the game developers are just sitting there marvelling at it. Oh, and I think SLI is the most ridiculous idea the market has ever produced. "Interesting. It seems our GPU is capable of processing ten times more data than these games are throwing at it, and yet they still don't run nearly as well as we thought they would.""Hmm, that is surely odd. Say, what if we had two of them?" :|JN_Fenrir

Here is an example of what to not listen too. AS he never answered one of your questions....lol. Gaming motherboards are things like extra LAN connections and some LEDs added. Theyre usually the top of hte line board from a MoBo company. The top motherbaord usually results in the companies pride and joy for overclocking.

The P35 board support DDR3, but currently their are not many good P35 boards. eVGA 680i rev.A1 and DFI's new 680i LANParty are said to support Penryn for future Intel CPU.

The best board out by a long shot is the new DFI LANParty, check my sig for SSJBens review on it. Also DFI is coming out with the P35 shortly and it supposedly just mruders all boards out there with its ridiculous overlcocking. Theyre currently working on a new cooling solution for the NB and SB. Theyre FSB on the board is 2.5Ghz.....:lol:

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40381

Avatar image for projectpat2007
projectpat2007

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 projectpat2007
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="JAMullins"]

http://www.nvidia.com/page/nforce_600i.html

nforce motherboards have always been for gamers. Performance results prove they are better for games... What more do you want?

-SaI

Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance.

MoBo's have nothing to do with performance.

evilbarbarian

Honestly I think Bebi_vegeta you dont know what you are talking about. Mobo's play a very important role and they do not all have the same performance.

evilbarbarian shush

Go to TomsHardware.com and read the reviews for motherboards. Why do they have different numbers in the performance comparison?

wow, you still go to TH?

~_~ go to some other site that actualy care about performance, like XS or overclock.net

ROFL...

Avatar image for Sandro909
Sandro909

15221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#31 Sandro909
Member since 2004 • 15221 Posts

Does anyone have any information reguarding the next step in gaming motherboards? My current favorites are the nforce 680a and 680i. I am sure new motherboards will support DDR3 memory and such but what is the future? PCIE faster then 8GB/s (x32)?JAMullins

Actually, DDR3 uses the same amount of pins as DDR2, it's just a little faster.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="JAMullins"]Bebi_vegeta settle down before you hurt yourself. Your words exactly "Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance." so if the numbers are different then does that make them the same. We are talking about motherboards in general. Why do motherboards have different price ranges? Why do they make new ones every year? and most importantly Why do you keep going on and on when you are WRONG? You are compairing very closely related motherboards. Go do me a favor and put an ASUS Striker Extreme against a MSI PM8M3-V. There is no chance "they all have the same performance". I am sure several people will back me... JAMullins

LOL you wanna know why?

Because each year or so a new product had been lunched, from procesors changing needing new socket, new chipset meaning faster front side to go with the processor and plenty of features, memory ddr to ddr3, video card pci, agp, pci-e and pci-e2.0 Also from SLI to crossfire, hard drive going to ata to sata... theres plenty of motherboard that are specific to a users needs.

And your comparing a micro atx motherboard ( that is old, with DDR memorie, AGP slot, ATA hard drive, with 800fbs) to a normal motherboard (1333fbs,ddr2,pci-e,sata,sli) ... comon get real!

You proved yourself wrong... Not all motherboards have the same performance... Thanks for wasting my time even more with your need to reply to everything...

Wow just wow... compare old technologie(that cant even have core 2 duo+ being micro atx) to the new one... yeah, nice logic. And where are your benchmarks proving this increase performance in game? I mean comon, you have shown no benchmarks from the start, i've shown plenty saying it's all the same performance. Now come back with some proof, or just step away.

Avatar image for projectpat2007
projectpat2007

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 projectpat2007
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts

[QUOTE="JAMullins"]Does anyone have any information reguarding the next step in gaming motherboards? My current favorites are the nforce 680a and 680i. I am sure new motherboards will support DDR3 memory and such but what is the future? PCIE faster then 8GB/s (x32)?Sandro909

Actually, DDR3 uses the same amount of pins as DDR2, it's just a little faster.

Yep, DDR3 is pin compatible with DDR2.

Even @ the same speeds, DDR3 is faster.

I like how that works because it slightly slows the upgrade process :)

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

DDR3 DIMMs have 240 pins, the same number as DDR2; however, the DIMMs are physically incompatible, owing to a different key notch location.

Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
DDR3 is not compatible with DDR2. Stop spreading false info
Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="-SaI"]

no such thing as "gaming mobo"

just a marketing schemeJAMullins

A gaming motherboard is a motherboard the runs better for games, not just a marketing scheme, but a better way of getting the most out of your games.

1 or 2 extra frames for an extra cost of $100? :lol:

The guy's right--there's no such thing as a gaming motherboard.

Now, an overclocking friendly motherboard is another thing...

http://usa.asus.com/products1.aspx?l1=3 "Marketing Gimmick"

Fixed.

Why should I pay over twice as much money for an ASUS Striker Extreme when a sturdy P965/P35 motherboard such as the P5B Deluxe or GA-P35-DS3 will do the job just fine?

What's the difference with someone inserting an 8800GTX in a Striker and labelling it a gaming rig compared to someobe insterting the GTX in a DS3? Nothing, there is no difference. Well, you could point out that the difference between the two is that one motherboard costed three fold as much as the other motherboard.

'Gaming Motherboard' is just a marketing stamp that companies put on products to fool customers like into thinking that it's a cheap ticket to better performance in games. I think you need to go and look at the basics of computer systems, particularly the part about standards and protocols.

Don't be fooled.

Avatar image for dragonrul55
dragonrul55

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dragonrul55
Member since 2006 • 452 Posts
I saw an add a day or 2 ago in a magazine about a mobo (MSI i think?) that was intel 45nm ready and ddr3 ready. Think it was called platnium or something. I could be wrong about the name though.
Avatar image for 42316
42316

1502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 42316
Member since 2006 • 1502 Posts
I think it ewould be awesome if we could stick 2 cpus on one mobo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts

I think it ewould be awesome if we could stick 2 cpus on one mobo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!142316

Servers have been doing that for a while. Intel has their V8 and AMD has the Quad FX.

Avatar image for JAMullins
JAMullins

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 JAMullins
Member since 2003 • 582 Posts
[QUOTE="JAMullins"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="JAMullins"]Bebi_vegeta settle down before you hurt yourself. Your words exactly "Motherboards play very little in gaming performance, and they all have the same performance." so if the numbers are different then does that make them the same. We are talking about motherboards in general. Why do motherboards have different price ranges? Why do they make new ones every year? and most importantly Why do you keep going on and on when you are WRONG? You are compairing very closely related motherboards. Go do me a favor and put an ASUS Striker Extreme against a MSI PM8M3-V. There is no chance "they all have the same performance". I am sure several people will back me... Bebi_vegeta

LOL you wanna know why?

Because each year or so a new product had been lunched, from procesors changing needing new socket, new chipset meaning faster front side to go with the processor and plenty of features, memory ddr to ddr3, video card pci, agp, pci-e and pci-e2.0 Also from SLI to crossfire, hard drive going to ata to sata... theres plenty of motherboard that are specific to a users needs.

And your comparing a micro atx motherboard ( that is old, with DDR memorie, AGP slot, ATA hard drive, with 800fbs) to a normal motherboard (1333fbs,ddr2,pci-e,sata,sli) ... comon get real!

You proved yourself wrong... Not all motherboards have the same performance... Thanks for wasting my time even more with your need to reply to everything...

Wow just wow... compare old technologie(that cant even have core 2 duo+ being micro atx) to the new one... yeah, nice logic. And where are your benchmarks proving this increase performance in game? I mean comon, you have shown no benchmarks from the start, i've shown plenty saying it's all the same performance. Now come back with some proof, or just step away.

Apparently you know everything so keep on posting... I was just stating a fact that not all motherboards have the same performance and you constantly keep telling me I am wrong. Enough is enough...

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
Apparently you know everything so keep on posting... I was just stating a fact that not all motherboards have the same performance and you constantly keep telling me I am wrong. Enough is enough... JAMullins
When you're talking about equal chipsets, the performance delta on motherboards seems to be tiny enough to almost ignore. Different motherboards quietly overclock your processor by a few MHz, but aside from giant bugs or broken hardware (a motherboard getting half the memory bandwidth it's supposed to), they perform closely enough to be called the same in my book. When you throw real overclocking into the mix, it just completely breaks the whole formula anyway. You're paying for BIOS options, RMA/support, stability, and component choice/layout. Sort of like buying 'Gaming RAM' that's exactly the same chips as some other normal brand. One might perform a % or two better out the box, but when you mess around with overclocking or tweaking they generally do the same thing in the end. For example, I'm pretty sure it's the marketing people at Asus that are in charge of the 'Gaming Series/Republic of Gamers' line. :D Not engineers!
Avatar image for KhanhAgE
KhanhAgE

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 KhanhAgE
Member since 2004 • 1345 Posts

People are right. What's a gaming motherboard?

I buy motherboards based on it's ability to overclock (no overclock features, no deal for me) and has 2x PCIe 16x.

Like some have said "gaming motherboards" are just marketing ploys. Just look at ASUS's line of Republic of Gamers (or whatever it's called) series of motherboards.