Games that will work on a bad computer?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zelda_Freek227
Zelda_Freek227

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Zelda_Freek227
Member since 2008 • 64 Posts

I don't exactly have a gaming pc, the best game I know for a fact that I can run is GTA:SA, so I know pretty much anything Pre-2004 I can run, any suggestions?

Avatar image for jakes456
jakes456

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jakes456
Member since 2011 • 1398 Posts

post specs?

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#3 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

post specs?

jakes456

This please, if you would.

Avatar image for thphaca
thphaca

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 thphaca
Member since 2005 • 202 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29145419/games-with-low-requirements

Like I said in the above topic, you'll want to go to the PC section of gamespot and use the filters to limit the list to games produced before, say.. 2005, or maybe before 2003. Generally, the year a game was released will give you an idea of the requirements for the game.

Anything before 2000, you'll probably be fine, under the condition that you're at least using Windows 98.

In 2000 and shortly after, you had games based on the q3 engine. Those can pretty much run on a calculator depending on your settings. They run decently on older integrated graphics chips. There were also games based on DirectX 8 and 8.1. These worked on older graphics chips.

In 2003 and forward, you start to see games based on DirectX 9, which require a compatible graphics chip (or else you won't see textures!) with slightly more GPU power equal to a modern integrated graphics chip or a dedicated GPU of that time. Games like Doom 3 (actually used OpenGL) stepped it up a notch. The increase of shaders and more complex lighting in games meant the need for more GPU power.

Around 2006, you'll start to need more memory and CPU power. At LEAST 512mb RAM to run, 1gb to run smoothly. Dual core for comfort. at least 2ghz CPU to reduce stutters. Graphics memory? IDK, around 256mb at least. Double that for higher quality settings.

Then you have those monstrous games like Crysis and GTA4 which we still have trouble maxing out.. They're the exception, though admittedly, Crysis runs decent on older systems with lower settings.

You kinda get the idea. I had to be careful which games I got before ~2006. I had a machine with 128mb RAM, 128mb VRAM, and a 500mhz Celeron. Luckily there was a good selection of games to fit those specs.

Edit: The info is geared more universally, rather than just your case.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts
resident evil 4 doom 3 fear sniper elite halflife 2 + episodes unreal tournament 2003 deus ex; invisible war the elders scrolls morrowind hitman series (not blood money) no one lives forever 2 call of duty 1&2 homeworld 1 & 2 abe's oddworld far cry painkiller all very good games
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Source games?

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#8 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

tc has asked this question like 12 times in 4 mionths.. your answers wont change broski

Avatar image for Yams1980
Yams1980

2866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#9 Yams1980
Member since 2006 • 2866 Posts

if u like rts games, try Command and Conquer The First Decade. Its almost all C&C games from the first one to the C&C Generals series. pretty much 10 years of games as the title says. 1995 onwards roughly. The C&C generals uses some 3d card power but very little, less far less power then San Andreas used.

Avatar image for Yams1980
Yams1980

2866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#10 Yams1980
Member since 2006 • 2866 Posts

oh this also... if u dont mind a unique platforming game, Psychonauts... released same year on PC as San Andreas. Similar requirements likely.

http://www.gamespot.com/psychonauts/platform/pc/

922157_20050518_640screen001.jpg

if u dont have a 360 gamepad though for your pc, u may wanna skip it. it would be awful with a keyboard.

Avatar image for muffinduck01
muffinduck01

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 muffinduck01
Member since 2007 • 317 Posts
Plants Vs Zombies works wonderfully on my laptop running a dual core Pentium @ 2.2 GHz, 4 GB RAM, and an integrated video card. I'd say go for that.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

if u like rts games, try Command and Conquer The First Decade. Its almost all C&C games from the first one to the C&C Generals series. pretty much 10 years of games as the title says. 1995 onwards roughly. The C&C generals uses some 3d card power but very little, less far less power then San Andreas used.

Yams1980
Red Alert 2 is an amazing game.