Games you would pay $100 for??

The only game I could concieveably see myself pay $100 (not special edition) for at launch would be Diablo 3 no doubt.

No other game would make this list for me. how about you.

There are suckers born every minute...

I'm not one of them.

Battlefield 3 (not a console port)Swiftstrike5

this. but i believe they are developing it for consoles too... wich means it has all the console limitations.

The only game I could concieveably see myself pay $100 (not special edition) for at launch would be Diablo 3 no doubt.

No other game would make this list for me. how about you.

hkhatir

Not a damn thing.

Not a damn thing.

MythPro1

Apart from Duke Nukem Forever?

A new Jedi Knight game using a current game engine but keeping/updating the feel of the swordplay. Or an update for Jedi Outcast. BOOYAH!

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

Whiteblade999

Uhm, none. I don't care if the original Fallout team got back together to produce a true sequel to what are possibly two of my favorite games ever, I still wouldn't pay more than $50 for it.

None. I just wait for steam to sell them 10-30 bucks. Not in a hurry.

Don't give them ideas.

If they ever release System Shock II and Deus Ex with a price tag of 100, I'd gladly buy them.Insanister

I'd glady pay $100 (ea.) for frame-by-frame remakes of Deus Ex and SS2 on CryEngine2.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]How about a proper Crysis sequel? ventnor

How would you make a proper sequel to something that already has an awful story, no new game mechanics and the only real shiny thing is the technology?

You're just a troll, you make obscene claims and didn't back them up in the slightest stop hating on games that get good review scores it's annoying.

Before EB here got a healthy dose of competition I used to pay $100 for games regularly.

Before EB here got a healthy dose of competition I used to pay $100 for games regularly.

the_mitch28

[QUOTE="ventnor"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]How about a proper Crysis sequel? GeneralShowzer

How would you make a proper sequel to something that already has an awful story, no new game mechanics and the only real shiny thing is the technology?

You're just a troll, you make obscene claims and didn't back them up in the slightest stop hating on games that get good review scores it's annoying.

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Battlefield 3 (not a console port)groowagon

this. but i believe they are developing it for consoles too... wich means it has all the console limitations.

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

FelipeInside

WoW is a lot more than a $100 after monthly fees.

a copy of diablo 3

So while, yes, most likely BF3 will be a multi-platform title, being a PC only game isn't out of the question. I still see a highly likely case of the PC version pretty much being it's own thing, with the console versions being developed from the PC version. Not only is this a better way to do multi system development, but the PC gamers will end up getting their proper version.

mouthforbathory

i doubt they'll make 2 very different versions under the same title... it's just not gonna happen. i can see the PC version having graphical advantages (besides the obvious controls), but that's about it. just like in BC2.

i'm gonna miss large maps : {

Max Payne 3 with co-op and multiplayerPredatorRules

i'd pay $100 to see those featured in Max Payne 3 made by Remedy.

Marfia 2

Max Payne 3

E.Y.E

KOTOR 3

Jedi Knight game with physics!

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

Whiteblade999

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

Cdscottie

you mean like WoW?

when you think of it, many people have payed well over $100 for it...

Id love to see Shenmue 3 on PC with Shenmue 1 & 2 remastered and reeased with it. Id pay $100 for that.

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Battlefield 3 (not a console port)groowagon

this. but i believe they are developing it for consoles too... wich means it has all the console limitations.

[QUOTE="Cdscottie"][QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Something that would last me 100 hours at least.

groowagon

you mean like WoW?

when you think of it, many people have payed well over $100 for it...

[QUOTE="groowagon"]

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Battlefield 3 (not a console port)Mystic-G

this. but i believe they are developing it for consoles too... wich means it has all the console limitations.

i know, but i just base my bad feeling on the fact that Frostbite 2.0 is designed for cross-platform development, and i have a feeling (yes, no facts on this) that they are using it in BF3.

but i found something cool said by Fredrik Liliegren, the CEO of DICE from 1988 to 2000, and Studio Manager of DICE Canada from 2001 to 2006;

Liliegren: ...I think for the console side, the first outing on [Xbox] 360 and PS2 and Xbox was really weak because we didn't have a single player experience. I think that Bad Company 2 is going to be really good because I think these guys are really smart and they learned the lesson. What the PC version is going to be, Battlefield 3, I think it's going to absolutely blow everyone away, but I can't tell you what it is, but it will blow people away.

GU(*): Even after 3 years?

Liliegren: That's why it's going to blow people away, because it's not Modern Warfare 2 PC, it's not that experience.

*: gamingunion.net

getting my hopes up here : ]

TF2