[QUOTE="JnWycliffe"]this is a really, really close competition! two very mediocre games - which is better? i'm going to go with gears of war, because at least i was able to finish the game, while i've yet to go beyond the first town in oblivion, despite many, many, many attempts to get into the game.gillri
how can they be mediocre when they got great reviews? i dont get it
Reviews are the opinions of individuals (or to be more accurate, reviews are the opinions of the corporate parents of the media outlet for which the individual writing the review works), and no one opinion (and by that rationale, any number of opinions) can be any more or less legitimate that any other opinion. In other words, no one opinion is "right", and regardless of how many opinions join in that choir, their song is no more legitimate than anyone else's.
In other words, reviews aren't "right" and they don't prove that a game is good, they're just the opinion of some guy. For instance, if JnWycliffe worked for GameSpot and was a well respected reviewer, and had scored Oblivion a 4/10, would your reaction be that he/she/it is correct and the game is therefore bad? Or would your reaction be that the majority says it is good, and the majority is always right? Or would your head explode due to conflicting opinions because it is your belief that all reviews (opinions of individuals) are right? Or would you perhaps make up your own mind regardless of what reviewers think?
How can you reconcile differing opinions without accepting that opinions carry relevance only for the people who agree with that opinion? And by extension, how can you reconcile that without accepting that the opinions of the guys who work professionally for media outlets are no more valid to those who disagree with them than anyone else's?
For instance, GameSpot rated the PS3 version of Mercenaries 2 a 5/10, while IGN scored it a 7.9. Who is right?
This post was funded by the JnWycliffe is too lazy to write his/her/its own replies association.
Log in to comment