Gigabyte add built in SSD to motherboard

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gl3ny
Gl3ny

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Gl3ny
Member since 2006 • 146 Posts

Gigabyte has come up with, what I think is, a pretty good idea! They've added a built in SSD to one of their upcoming motherboards! I might include something like this in my next build if it gets popular. What do you guys think?

http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/gigabyte-bolts-an-ssd-to-a-motherboard-so-you-dont-have-to/

Avatar image for LordRork
LordRork

2692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#2 LordRork
Member since 2004 • 2692 Posts

It's a nice idea. Although I think I'd prefer to buy a "proper" SSD with a larger volume so I can store more than just Windows on it.

Avatar image for istuffedsunny
istuffedsunny

6991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#3 istuffedsunny
Member since 2008 • 6991 Posts
Looks like a gay leprechaun threw up all over the box... I think this has something to do with SSD caching, which to me sounds about as appealing as those Seagate Momenthus drives :P
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Do want
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Maybe 30Gb to ensure i can put a bunch of decent apps on it as well... This will probably become similar to integrated graphics, good and helpful but will be replaced rather swiftly.
Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
20 actual GB is the typical size of a Win7 installation. I don't see it making a practical boot drive because of that, although other OSes would fit. It'll also drive the price up quite a bit, because it's Intel and it's SLC instead of the usual MLC, but you get what you pay for. I still foresee people just sticking with typical 2.5" SSDs if they want one (most desktops have the space, after all), but this could come in handy for cases with few 3.5" bays (if it were to be coupled with several HDDs), or if someone needs that mSATA slot to diagnose a notebook's mSATA SSD (though I'm pretty sure there are adapters for that).
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
This isn't for storage really, it's meant for caching files lol.
Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
I've read a bit more about it, and it's like making a Seagate Momentus XT out of any HDD/SSD combination...but the SSD cache only goes up to 64 GB. Unlike the Momentus XT's built-in SLC cache, it caches both reads and writes. (Unfortunately, it's limited to certain Intel chipsets despite not looking like something that should be limited to those chipsets. Planned obsolescence at work again, I suppose. *glares at X18-M G1 and its TRIM-less firmware despite having the same controller architecture*) At the very least, it looks like it would make for a nice scratch disk for those into Adobe CS and other such apps.
Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

Thats nice, too bad i already bought a ssd for cache(which helps alot btw)

Avatar image for fishing666
fishing666

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 fishing666
Member since 2004 • 2113 Posts
i wouldn't buy it...i prefer to have all my programs and os on a single ssd and media/install files on hdds
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

It's just a good idea at an entry level.

I'll definetly buy once they fit 120GB +

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Why are you guys thinking it's for being used as a disk drive? It's meant to act as a cache.
Avatar image for fishing666
fishing666

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 fishing666
Member since 2004 • 2113 Posts
Why are you guys thinking it's for being used as a disk drive? It's meant to act as a cache.JigglyWiggly_
20gb as cache? then what is ram and video ram for?
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Why are you guys thinking it's for being used as a disk drive? It's meant to act as a cache.fishing666
20gb as cache? then what is ram and video ram for?

Heh? This isn't that either really, it's just acting as a cache for most used files, windows startup files, and w/e you use. This is non-volataile, so that's one of the big differences right there lol.