AAAAAAAAAAAA its 8 years! For the love of god make a RTS squal!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="REd_toe"]AAAAAAAAAAAA its 8 years! For the love of god make a RTS squal!
FTemplar
10 years, actually. SC was released in 1998
Of course Starcraft 2 will be hyped and ppl will complain about it (same thing with Halo 2) when they didn't get from what they expected (that happens with most or all games). But this is coming from Blizzard and they haven't mad a "bad" game in a long long long time and top of that there are millions of fans around the world, who want to see what happens next in the story line and a new and improved online RTS. Now for Starcraft Ghost, i would have bought it but Blizz thought it would but crap on old gen consoles.
The gaming industry is very small and personally knowing people in it, word spreads quickly about who is doing what, my sources tell me that Starcraft 2 has been in the works for about a year and a half, though much of that was merely a productio part of the phase. I also know that for quite a while Blizzard has had most of their guys who were working on it on the Burning Crusade. So I am told the earliest it could possibly appear is in 2009BeyondItAll
Lets hope you are right.
[QUOTE="Exile91"][QUOTE="FuRRieT87"]They are working on a NEW RTS :)jayrangHopefully you wont have to do some stupid Pay to Play crap with it like you did in WoW. "3 dollars per multiplayer match" NO they will try to milk u good. $5 everytime u click join game.
7$ for every time you run the game, 15$ a month just for having it installed.
There will be no Starcraft 2. The OP is one of the millions making these threads, but that wont help.IBEX333
... Any reasons why there wouldn't be a Starcraft 2? I would think the chances are pretty high, they have made sequels in all of their most popular series.. But it is really too early to see what will happen with the title..
There will be no Starcraft 2. The OP is one of the millions making these threads, but that wont help.IBEX333thats going in my sig.... so when it comes out I can shove it in your face
from multiple sources.
"StarCraft is my absolutely favorite game of all time," Sams told us. "As you probably already know, there is no doubt that we will continue the StarCraft and Diablo franchise, and trust me, I will be the happiest person in the world when we announce StarCraft 2."
While Sams wasn't ready to spill the beans just yet, he did say Blizzard "will have a major product announcement in 2007," and that Blizzard was currently working on at least three other unannounced titles at the moment.
In terms of what these games could be, we asked if they would fall in line with the major success Blizzard has had with World of Warcraft. "I want to be clear that we're not just content to be an MMO company," Sams explained. "Some other companies get into the role of making just MMOs, but Blizzard lets the developers pick what they want to work on, and it's not all MMOs."
Blizzard didn’t make any allusions about a possible Diablo 3, but this didn’t stop rumors from circulating.
After Bill Roper’s resignation,
it looked like there wouldn’t be any sequel to Diablo, even though Blizzard North had started to look for experienced designers.
But after Ropers’s announcement that his new studio will launch Hellgate: London, an employee of the Bratislava Symphony Orchestra posted on DiabloII.net information according to which the orchestra is currently working at the soundtrack for Diablo 3.
Actually, the information was received as an e-mail whose content was this:
“I am musician in Czech Republic. I play not with one orchestra but with many depending on work. I have recently been to Bratislava in Slovak Republic for recording sessions with local Radio Symphony Orchestra, where we just recorded music for Diablo 3.”
The information might contain some truth, because the same orchestra recorded the music for the add-on of Diablo II: Lord of Destruction.
Obviously Blizzard didn’t make any comments.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment