Good free Virus Scanners.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shootn
Shootn

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Shootn
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts

I thought it would be nice to post what free virus scanners people are using. I know how mad it gets when people are looking for virus scanners then get one where you have to buy after a scan. I have found a very nice virus scanner that scans and repairs the registry and its free. It seemed like it made my computer run a little faster from not having a virus scan besides Windows Defender. Hope you guys like it.

Here is a link from CNET

http://download.cnet.com/Glary-Utilities/3000-2094_4-10508531.html

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.04dcarraher

It's let a couple things through for me before and the updates crashed my games

Anyone looking for security should have a look here

Avatar image for Luminouslight
Luminouslight

6397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Luminouslight
Member since 2007 • 6397 Posts
Avira isn't a bad anti-virus either. I prefer it over Avast, but AVG takes the crown for the most part.
Avatar image for edd678
edd678

3660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 edd678
Member since 2006 • 3660 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.markop2003


It's let a couple things through for me before and the updates crashed my games

Anyone looking for security should have a look here

How the **** can that be a credible guide when

1) He states that many of the best anti viruses are free (you get what you pay for ffs)

and 2) He suggests avast free edition which is utter ****!

After scrollign down and reading that i didnt bother with the rest.

Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts

[QUOTE="markop2003"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.edd678


It's let a couple things through for me before and the updates crashed my games

Anyone looking for security should have a look here

How the **** can that be a credible guide when

1) He states that many of the best anti viruses are free (you get what you pay for ffs)

and 2) He suggests avast free edition which is utter ****!

After scrollign down and reading that i didnt bother with the rest.

still a decent guide

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

[QUOTE="markop2003"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.edd678


It's let a couple things through for me before and the updates crashed my games

Anyone looking for security should have a look here

How the **** can that be a credible guide when

1) He states that many of the best anti viruses are free (you get what you pay for ffs)

and 2) He suggests avast free edition which is utter ****!

After scrollign down and reading that i didnt bother with the rest.

I read the blog post, and.. well, both of those things are true. If all you want is anti-virus, Avast! and Avira both offer some of the best detection rates. Their paid versions use the exact same databases as the free versions (as most AV's with two versions do), so you're getting that crazy detection rate for free.

In the latest AV-Comparatives PDF that I saw from Feb, Avira pulled 2nd place in detections (99.7%), putting it well ahead of Avast! (98.2%), NOD32 (97.6%), Kapersky (97.1%), and especially AVG (93%).

Avatar image for Shootn
Shootn

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Shootn
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts

i had read something on maximum pc on which they based 10 of some anti virus programs to see what they rated. They rated Norton Internet security as a good pay for Program. I will give a link to the article.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/protect_your_pc_from_guys_like_this

Avatar image for amirzaim
amirzaim

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 amirzaim
Member since 2007 • 1720 Posts
AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.04dcarraher
AVG is a good antivirus software but sometimes when you're updating the antivirus from the software, maybe would have an update error that causing some antivirus components are corrupted. So, if you want to update the AVG antivirus, the best way is update the software manually by downloading the update files from http://free.avg.com. For me, i'm using 2 antivirus software, AVG and avast! Avast! is better than AVG.
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

[QUOTE="edd678"]

[QUOTE="markop2003"]
It's let a couple things through for me before and the updates crashed my games

Anyone looking for security should have a look here

Makari

How the **** can that be a credible guide when

1) He states that many of the best anti viruses are free (you get what you pay for ffs)

and 2) He suggests avast free edition which is utter ****!

After scrollign down and reading that i didnt bother with the rest.

I read the blog post, and.. well, both of those things are true. If all you want is anti-virus, Avast! and Avira both offer some of the best detection rates. Their paid versions use the exact same databases as the free versions (as most AV's with two versions do), so you're getting that crazy detection rate for free.

In the latest AV-Comparatives PDF that I saw from Feb, Avira pulled 2nd place in detections (99.7%), putting it well ahead of Avast! (98.2%), NOD32 (97.6%), Kapersky (97.1%), and especially AVG (93%).

LOL, thanks for the backup guys :) Anyhoo Eddy doesent know what he is on about, by his logic Norton & McAfee should be top of the line ^^ If its of any relevance i work as a PC technician for a living so i use a large amount of AV programs on a dialy basis...Avast is Amazing for a freee program and Antivir is also good.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]AVG Anti Virus Free is pretty good too.amirzaim
AVG is a good antivirus software but sometimes when you're updating the antivirus from the software, maybe would have an update error that causing some antivirus components are corrupted. So, if you want to update the AVG antivirus, the best way is update the software manually by downloading the update files from http://free.avg.com. For me, i'm using 2 antivirus software, AVG and avast! Avast! is better than AVG.

Also the latest few versions of AVG have become VERY bloated.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

i had read something on maximum pc on which they based 10 of some anti virus programs to see what they rated. They rated Norton Internet security as a good pay for Program. I will give a link to the article.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/protect_your_pc_from_guys_like_this

Shootn
That's a terrible article, it marked Avast down because of it's UI and because it offers boot scanning. Also it thought the instant definition update in Norton is a new thing.
Avatar image for BLKR4330
BLKR4330

1698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 BLKR4330
Member since 2006 • 1698 Posts

I thought it would be nice to post what free virus scanners people are using. I know how mad it gets when people are looking for virus scanners then get one where you have to buy after a scan. I have found a very nice virus scanner that scans and repairs the registry and its free. It seemed like it made my computer run a little faster from not having a virus scan besides Windows Defender. Hope you guys like it.

Here is a link from CNET

http://download.cnet.com/Glary-Utilities/3000-2094_4-10508531.html

Shootn

That link doesn't direct me to a virus scanner so I'm a little confused about what you are trying to say here.

Anyway, I have been using Avast for years now (ever since some other free scanner failed to detect an infection, i think that was antivir coincidentally) and have never had a single problem with it.

Avatar image for ticktocktick201
ticktocktick201

999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#14 ticktocktick201
Member since 2004 • 999 Posts

antivir all day long. the new free version include antispyware, and the detection rates are way higher than avg or avast.

here

here

but if for sum reason u dont want antivir, go with avast. avast is still better than avg.

Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts

OMG people, some of the WORST anti-virus apps are free. I DO NOT recommend using a free anti-virus app. Use Kaspersky or Nod32, two of the best out of all others hands down. I use Kaspersky, they also give you a one month trial to try it out first in which case you'll have to obtain a lincense. Go to Kaspersky.com and give it a try. Norton and Mcafee are a joke. (Norton being one of the worst)

Avatar image for edd678
edd678

3660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 edd678
Member since 2006 • 3660 Posts

[QUOTE="Makari"]

[QUOTE="edd678"]

How the **** can that be a credible guide when

1) He states that many of the best anti viruses are free (you get what you pay for ffs)

and 2) He suggests avast free edition which is utter ****!

After scrollign down and reading that i didnt bother with the rest.

Daytona_178

I read the blog post, and.. well, both of those things are true. If all you want is anti-virus, Avast! and Avira both offer some of the best detection rates. Their paid versions use the exact same databases as the free versions (as most AV's with two versions do), so you're getting that crazy detection rate for free.

In the latest AV-Comparatives PDF that I saw from Feb, Avira pulled 2nd place in detections (99.7%), putting it well ahead of Avast! (98.2%), NOD32 (97.6%), Kapersky (97.1%), and especially AVG (93%).

LOL, thanks for the backup guys :) Anyhoo Eddy doesent know what he is on about, by his logic Norton & McAfee should be top of the line ^^ If its of any relevance i work as a PC technician for a living so i use a large amount of AV programs on a dialy basis...Avast is Amazing for a freee program and Antivir is also good.

If you really wanted to look after your comp from the **** that is out there on the net you wouldnt use a free program, simple as. I work in I.T and through some stupid company policy avast pro is used on all comps and servers. The ammount of times the servers and comps have had to be formatted, slowed down etc from viruses that avast has no detected is unbeliveable. Its happned around 4 times this year already costing the company a **** load of money. If thats the pro version then i dread to think about the ****ness of avast free. Plenty of better antivirus and i would personally never use that avast ****e on my pc.

Avatar image for darkmagician06
darkmagician06

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 darkmagician06
Member since 2003 • 6060 Posts
AVAST!!!
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
I still use AVG free, with no problems.
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="edd678"]

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

[QUOTE="Makari"] I read the blog post, and.. well, both of those things are true. If all you want is anti-virus, Avast! and Avira both offer some of the best detection rates. Their paid versions use the exact same databases as the free versions (as most AV's with two versions do), so you're getting that crazy detection rate for free.

In the latest AV-Comparatives PDF that I saw from Feb, Avira pulled 2nd place in detections (99.7%), putting it well ahead of Avast! (98.2%), NOD32 (97.6%), Kapersky (97.1%), and especially AVG (93%).

LOL, thanks for the backup guys :) Anyhoo Eddy doesent know what he is on about, by his logic Norton & McAfee should be top of the line ^^ If its of any relevance i work as a PC technician for a living so i use a large amount of AV programs on a dialy basis...Avast is Amazing for a freee program and Antivir is also good.

If you really wanted to look after your comp from the **** that is out there on the net you wouldnt use a free program, simple as. I work in I.T and through some stupid company policy avast pro is used on all comps and servers. The ammount of times the servers and comps have had to be formatted, slowed down etc from viruses that avast has no detected is unbeliveable. Its happned around 4 times this year already costing the company a **** load of money. If thats the pro version then i dread to think about the ****ness of avast free. Plenty of better antivirus and i would personally never use that avast ****e on my pc.

well, unfortunately, you've got cold hard facts from groups that do nothing but test anti-virus. those two free versions that you hate so much still detect better than both Kapersky and NOD32, if you're talking about just straight detection rates. regardless of your *opinion*, antivir and avast are *better* at detecting. period, and there's a ton of evidence to back it up (i.e. every single link in this thread to some kind of antivirus comparison). system resource usage, false positives, etc are an entirely different story. and if you work in IT, you're using a managed client-server AV anyway and the workstations should be locked down to hell and back so it's vaguely moot anyway.
Avatar image for Shootn
Shootn

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Shootn
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts
[QUOTE="BLKR4330"]

[QUOTE="Shootn"]

I thought it would be nice to post what free virus scanners people are using. I know how mad it gets when people are looking for virus scanners then get one where you have to buy after a scan. I have found a very nice virus scanner that scans and repairs the registry and its free. It seemed like it made my computer run a little faster from not having a virus scan besides Windows Defender. Hope you guys like it.

Here is a link from CNET

http://download.cnet.com/Glary-Utilities/3000-2094_4-10508531.html

That link doesn't direct me to a virus scanner so I'm a little confused about what you are trying to say here.

Anyway, I have been using Avast for years now (ever since some other free scanner failed to detect an infection, i think that was antivir coincidentally) and have never had a single problem with it.

The glary utilities is a virus scanner and a registry cleaner in one. Which it is alright for the registry cleaner but i guess i would go with avg for the virus scanning.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
avast is great
Avatar image for Shootn
Shootn

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Shootn
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts

lately i have been using a new virus/registry scanner called advanced system care.

http://download.cnet.com/Advanced-SystemCare-Free/3000-2086_4-10407614.html