This topic is locked from further discussion.
Hello everyone, I just ordered some new computer components and now I'm thinking about taking the plunge and getting a new graphics card. My new set up will be: Intel Core i7-4770 Gigabyte GA-Z87-UD3H Kingston HyperX Beast 16 GB Kit (2x8 GB) 2400MHz DDR3 The graphics card i have at the moment is evga Geforce 570 GTX 1280 ram. I'm thinking about spending around $700 (though i prefer spending much less) on a graphics cards that would feel like a HUGE upgrade from my current graphics card. I was originally considering the 690 GTX but the price is HUGE. Tell me what you think. PS. my main game is BF3101374
Â
It is a shame NV gave the base model 570 only 1.2GB, and extra 300mb (480 memory) you could easily handle it better.
Â
I would go all out on a 780 in all honesty, i mean why the hell not? :P
I recommend the 4GB GTX770. That will cover your gaming needs for years. And also remember that Battlefield 4 is coming out in like 3-4 months, so you might want a GPU that also covers that.gp19
Â
4GB across a 256-Bit bus is useless with a single monitor and GPU setup.
Â
The GPU it's self will run out of oomph before it hits a memory wall even with 2GB.
[QUOTE="gp19"]I recommend the 4GB GTX770. That will cover your gaming needs for years. And also remember that Battlefield 4 is coming out in like 3-4 months, so you might want a GPU that also covers that.AMD655
Â
4GB across a 256-Bit bus is useless with a single monitor and GPU setup.
Â
The GPU it's self will run out of oomph before it hits a memory wall even with 2GB.
could you please confirm if i understood this correctly, if i'm not going to have a dual display, then a 2gb memory is enough?Dual display? it will use no memory because you cannot play games across 2 screens, unless you want a bezel in the middle of your view.
Â
And as i already stated, you will not be able to use 4GB, the bus width is too low, it would be fine in 3-way SLi however.
First of all, thanks to everyone for their comments and replies. I see most comments are suggesting the 700 series. However, according to to nvidia website the 690 seems to be performing far much better than the 700 series and titan.101374
That's because 690 is a dual GPU card. They come with their fair share of downsides, hence people will generally recommend a single GPU, and SLI another in the future.
[QUOTE="gp19"]I recommend the 4GB GTX770. That will cover your gaming needs for years. And also remember that Battlefield 4 is coming out in like 3-4 months, so you might want a GPU that also covers that.AMD655
Â
4GB across a 256-Bit bus is useless with a single monitor and GPU setup.
Â
The GPU it's self will run out of oomph before it hits a memory wall even with 2GB.
People tried to tell me the same thing when I decided to get a 2GB 560 Ti instead of the 1GB version. Shortly thereafter, everyone was complaining about stuttering in games that use more than 1GB of VRAM. Hell, Aliens vs Predator is 3 1/2 years old, and it uses every bit of 2GB of VRAM at 1080p. With the new consoles having enough VRAM for developers to push memory usage in multiplats, and with so many current games already hitting 2GB of VRAM usage, I wouldn't get a card with less than 3GB of VRAM at this point...go for AMD 7970, nvidia cards have compatability issues with newer games due to their messed up drivers
it also has 3 gigs VRAM very useful if youre gaming on 1080p or more, the new gtx 700s only have 2 gigs and a smaller memory bus so beware
People tried to tell me the same thing when I decided to get a 2GB 560 Ti instead of the 1GB version. Shortly thereafter, everyone was complaining about stuttering in games that use more than 1GB of VRAM. Hell, Aliens vs Predator is 3 1/2 years old, and it uses every bit of 2GB of VRAM at 1080p. With the new consoles having enough VRAM for developers to push memory usage in multiplats, and with so many current games already hitting 2GB of VRAM usage, I wouldn't get a card with less than 3GB of VRAM at this point...superclocked
Yez. Modded and future games will eat up vram.
Bf3 can be quite demanding if you want to run it very smoothly.
go for AMD 7970, nvidia cards have compatability issues with newer games due to their messed up drivers
it also has 3 gigs VRAM very useful if youre gaming on 1080p or more, the new gtx 700s only have 2 gigs and a smaller memory bus so beware
ClassicRockFTW
Â
GTX 780 is 384-bit and 3GB, please talk biased elsewhere.
[QUOTE="superclocked"]People tried to tell me the same thing when I decided to get a 2GB 560 Ti instead of the 1GB version. Shortly thereafter, everyone was complaining about stuttering in games that use more than 1GB of VRAM. Hell, Aliens vs Predator is 3 1/2 years old, and it uses every bit of 2GB of VRAM at 1080p. With the new consoles having enough VRAM for developers to push memory usage in multiplats, and with so many current games already hitting 2GB of VRAM usage, I wouldn't get a card with less than 3GB of VRAM at this point...Bikouchu35
Yez. Modded and future games will eat up vram.
Bf3 can be quite demanding if you want to run it very smoothly.
Â
It only needs 1.5GB upto 1440p.
[QUOTE="ClassicRockFTW"]
go for AMD 7970, nvidia cards have compatability issues with newer games due to their messed up drivers
it also has 3 gigs VRAM very useful if youre gaming on 1080p or more, the new gtx 700s only have 2 gigs and a smaller memory bus so beware
AMD655
GTX 780 is 384-bit and 3GB, please talk biased elsewhere.
the 690 gtx 512-bit with 4 gig`s and it`s awesome.....[QUOTE="AMD655"]
[QUOTE="ClassicRockFTW"]
go for AMD 7970, nvidia cards have compatability issues with newer games due to their messed up drivers
it also has 3 gigs VRAM very useful if youre gaming on 1080p or more, the new gtx 700s only have 2 gigs and a smaller memory bus so beware
tionmedon
Â
GTX 780 is 384-bit and 3GB, please talk biased elsewhere.
the 690 gtx 512-bit with 4 gig`s and it`s awesome.....Â
256-bit and only 2GB.
Â
Memory in CFX and SLi is mirrored, not combined.
With a budget of $700, go for either a NVidia GTX770 or AMD 7970. Remember that cards frome NVidia and AMD that have "90" at the back of their numbering are dual cards (two GPUs on one PCB) and as a consequence are 70 to 90% more powerful. And 'slightly' more pricy too...
Gigabyte GTX 770 4GB WINDFORCE101374Gigabyte uses quality components, and that's an excellent cooler. Plus, it's cheaper on top of that. Out of those, I would get that one...
yes, i acknowledge this. but my previous post compared two 780s together, and three 770s together. i could not figure out how one differs from another. for example one of the 770s is almost identical in specs, but the board looks different even though they are both same brand. got me confused.780>770
AMD655
780 if you want nvidia, and 7970 if you want great hardware at a great price. The 7970 has 3gb vram and a 384bit mem bus at a price of $350, and the only card that compares to that on nvidias side is the geforce 780 at around $650 and the titan at $1000. Nothing else in nvidias lineup compares. Yes the 780 is faster than the 7970 ghz, but the difference is around 15-20% max, not a big deal at all.
I will let TC make his mind up, not some fanboy above.
AMD655
Well, seems like the 'fanboy' is right. The GTX seems to be only marginally faster for at least $150 more. After having seen that clip, I'd go for the AMD 7970...
What I've also learned is that some folks better leave their wannabe Samurai moves in the closet, lest they want to wind-up in hospital...
The decision just been made easy for me... The video convinced me that the two are very close in specs but the gtx 780 did outperform the AMD 7970. So I decided I want to get the 780, however it is not available in stock at Amazon Global. My only options are either the TITAN or GTX 770. Since the AMD 7970 is very close from the 780's performance, and since the TITAN is way much more expensive than the 780 and the 7970... so i think the 7970 is my only available option at the moment. i'll check newegg as last resort... if the 780 is not available there for global shipping then i will get the 7970 from amazon. EDIT: I just found the XFX FX-799A-XNF9 Radeon HD 7990 6GB 384-bit x2 GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 CrossFireX Support Video Card... which is supposed to be equivalent to TITAN, correct? If so, its a good deal... i think... at $830. Shall i place the order?Â
I will let TC make his mind up, not some fanboy above.
AMD655
[QUOTE="AMD655"]The decision just been made easy for me... The video convinced me that the two are very close in specs but the gtx 780 did outperform the AMD 7970. So I decided I want to get the 780, however it is not available in stock at Amazon Global. My only options are either the TITAN or GTX 770. Since the AMD 7970 is very close from the 780's performance, and since the TITAN is way much more expensive than the 780 and the 7970... so i think the 7970 is my only available option at the moment. i'll check newegg as last resort... if the 780 is not available there for global shipping then i will get the 7970 from amazon. EDIT: I just found the XFX FX-799A-XNF9 Radeon HD 7990 6GB 384-bit x2 GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 CrossFireX Support Video Card... which is supposed to be equivalent to TITAN, correct? If so, its a good deal... i think... at $830. Shall i place the order? Read my post ^ better than Titan for half the cost, no need to spend that much.Â
I will let TC make his mind up, not some fanboy above.
101374
[QUOTE="101374"][QUOTE="AMD655"]The decision just been made easy for me... The video convinced me that the two are very close in specs but the gtx 780 did outperform the AMD 7970. So I decided I want to get the 780, however it is not available in stock at Amazon Global. My only options are either the TITAN or GTX 770. Since the AMD 7970 is very close from the 780's performance, and since the TITAN is way much more expensive than the 780 and the 7970... so i think the 7970 is my only available option at the moment. i'll check newegg as last resort... if the 780 is not available there for global shipping then i will get the 7970 from amazon. EDIT: I just found the XFX FX-799A-XNF9 Radeon HD 7990 6GB 384-bit x2 GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 CrossFireX Support Video Card... which is supposed to be equivalent to TITAN, correct? If so, its a good deal... i think... at $830. Shall i place the order? Read my post ^ better than Titan for half the cost, no need to spend that much. Yup, thats why i already placed the order:)Â
I will let TC make his mind up, not some fanboy above.
crazy-player
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment