Good looking, running and exciting flight sims?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for VeryBumpy
VeryBumpy

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 VeryBumpy
Member since 2008 • 1718 Posts

Yeah there are several 'quality' sims out there but not a one can do all 3. Seems each one sacrifices one of the 3.

Why do all flight sims either look like poo? Or run like poo? Or are boring as poo?

Hoping the new MS one finally has all 3.

Avatar image for Lamb_Jalfrezi
Lamb_Jalfrezi

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Lamb_Jalfrezi
Member since 2002 • 178 Posts
What? Look like poo, run like poo and be as boring as poo? You should aim higher.
Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
IL-2 1946 is very fun, but would probably fall under your "Looks like poo" category. There is a new version you can look at IL-2 Wings of Prey. It has nice new graphics, but not so much content wise compared to the older game. That being said it still has plenty
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

The MS:CFS games looked good, ran good and were really exciting!

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Why do all flight sims either look like poo? Or run like poo? Or are boring as poo?

Hoping the new MS one finally has all 3.

VeryBumpy
And why would you appear to have the language of a 10 year old? There are tons that run fine, look grand and they're simulations. If you want whizz bang stupidity then don't pickup a simulation.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Yeah there are several 'quality' sims out there but not a one can do all 3. Seems each one sacrifices one of the 3.

Why do all flight sims either look like poo? Or run like poo? Or are boring as poo?

Hoping the new MS one finally has all 3.

VeryBumpy

Boring is a relative. what you find boring, others may find exciting. The same goes for looks. But, running like poo? Sure. FSX is the worst offender. You can try X-Plane 9 (version 10 is already out) and see if it's to your tastes. It runs much better than FSX.

If you do try X-Plane 9, the airports can be very underwhelming considering the size of install.

Avatar image for CHANCESUNDANCE
CHANCESUNDANCE

805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CHANCESUNDANCE
Member since 2006 • 805 Posts

Air conflicts secret wars IF you like old planes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VeF-p4HH4s